It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Goldman Sachs chief: Sanders's criticism is 'dangerous'

page: 2
50
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 3 2016 @ 09:25 PM
link   
Amazing. Sanders describes his actions, and it's Sanders that's dangerous.

It's like a grown man's version of, "stop hitting yourself"




posted on Feb, 3 2016 @ 09:49 PM
link   
a reply to: AlaskanDad

So this is what struck me the most



“To personalize it, it has potential to be a dangerous moment. Not just for Wall Street ... but for anybody who is a little bit out of line,” he said in an interview with CNBC.



Anything happens to Sanders and there is your answer....Anybody who is a little bit out of line...sounds like a warning to me...and out of what line...the ESF, Fed, World Bank, IMF, CIA (who I have learned is funded by the ESF and does their laundering)?



posted on Feb, 3 2016 @ 09:58 PM
link   
a reply to: liveandlearn

Interesting catch, I did not see that as a threat to Sanders, now you pointed it out it's glaring.



posted on Feb, 3 2016 @ 10:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: pirhanna
His criticism is in the right place. Too bad his policies would finish gutting the middle class, destroy small businesses, further empower large corporations through reduction of competition and work to make everyone equally and blissfully poor.

Bernie, he knows whats wrong and a has a solution even worwe than the problem.

I think you're right and he's like most democrats are: supporters of the nanny state. So I'll add Bernie won't further empower large corporations, he'll empower government, resulting in what you say.

Predictably, republicans would support large corporations--which isn't much different. I have to wonder if we'll ever have a politician who can leverage both sides of the political spectrum. In fact, I think perhaps the inevitable fate is all politics results in the same thing: the hungry elite or super class (or collective) having priority over the individual.

I have to think this is about conservation of energy or some physical or universal law. Maybe it's tied to how an individual is inherently limited in their capacity to know and do. Or maybe something else.

Sorry, I am jaded with politics and things in general.
edit on 2/3/2016 by jonnywhite because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 3 2016 @ 10:56 PM
link   
a reply to: jonnywhite

I guess you have not noticed that 99%+ of the dems feed from the corporations pig troughs?

Who passed the ACA the biggest gift to corporations, since glass steagal was removed.

So Dem are addicted corporate cash and owned as the Reps.

And just so you know Sanders is not addicted to wall street, and you should read his ideas to cut fraud out of our government.

Thanks for your truly uninformed opinion!



posted on Feb, 3 2016 @ 10:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: schuyler

originally posted by: pirhanna
His criticism is in the right place. Too bad his policies would finish gutting the middle class, destroy small businesses, further empower large corporations through reduction of competition and work to make everyone equally and blissfully poor.

Bernie, he knows whats wrong and a has a solution even worse than the problem.


Here's one of them:



That is the whole Socialist platform displayed perfectly, suck the life out of society till nothing goes round.



posted on Feb, 3 2016 @ 10:58 PM
link   
a reply to: TinfoilTP

Careful that Rethuglican free energy device can burn your rectum!

Try the Sanders approved free energy device instead!





edit on 3-2-2016 by AlaskanDad because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 4 2016 @ 09:41 AM
link   
a reply to: pirhanna

i agree, you got it bro



posted on Feb, 4 2016 @ 10:16 AM
link   
If I was Lloyd Blankfein, I would start spending some campaign money for Bernie, or at least run some anti Hillary primary ads. Make sure the ads specifically says...paid for by Goldman Sachs



posted on Feb, 4 2016 @ 01:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: pirhanna
His criticism is in the right place. Too bad his policies would finish gutting the middle class, destroy small businesses, further empower large corporations through reduction of competition and work to make everyone equally and blissfully poor.

Bernie, he knows whats wrong and a has a solution even worwe than the problem.


Just because you say so I guess.



posted on Feb, 4 2016 @ 01:30 PM
link   
And the fact that he's scaring them is the very reason he won't get 'elected'.

When will you people realize that this is a game, a rigged game at that. TPTB aren't going to install someone that won't play ball...



posted on Feb, 4 2016 @ 01:34 PM
link   
The problem with Bernie Sanders is that if the dems somehow nominate him he may be a big loser and cause the country to get more control by the GOP.

Bernie should think of that

Bernie should put his ego down and think of the disaster if he looses

Does he really think a 74 year old Jewish socialist can win?

And remember the other extreme liberal the dems nominated in 1968 George McGovern
He lost in a huge landslide to Richard Nixon.



posted on Feb, 4 2016 @ 04:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Willtell

He has thought of that, numerous times he's stated just that;

“We need a political revolution of millions of people in this country who are prepared to stand up and say, ‘enough is enough,’” Sanders argued. “I want to help lead that effort.”


Sanders: ‘We need a political revolution’, May 2015

One of the best turnouts we've had in recent memory was 2008 when 58.2% of the voting age population came out to vote. The last time that percentage of people voted was in 1960 when JFK beat Nixon.

You mentioned the McGovern loss. I think it was a lot more than just McGovern being an 'extreme liberal.' Nixon was a sitting president who was really, really popular at the time. In addition to that McGovern's VP pick had a scandal break during the election about his psychiatric issues. Add to that, the Democratic party was lukewarm, at best, at supporting McGovern for the nomination.

I think, with the exception of party support, the '72 election and the 2016 election are very, very different.

If Sanders gets the nomination and if he can tap into that 40% of the electorate that stayed home in 2008, he can win and he can win big. Especially if the GOP picks an establishment candidate.
edit on 4-2-2016 by links234 because: Why can't I add links properly, what is wrong with me?!



posted on Feb, 4 2016 @ 04:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Willtell

And remember the other extreme liberal the dems nominated in 1968 George McGovern
He lost in a huge landslide to Richard Nixon.


McGovern was 1972.




posted on Feb, 4 2016 @ 04:26 PM
link   
"dangerous"

"out of line"

Sounds like Sanders is starting to really piss off the cartel godfathers...


Now that's a potential US president with some meat on his bones !




posted on Feb, 4 2016 @ 06:11 PM
link   
If Bernie actually opposed the banks he would have stuck it to the FED 6 years ago. In 2010 Bernie and Ron Paul went in on a bill to deregulate and audit the FED. Bernie ended up gutting the bill at the last minute, granting the FED even more powers. That was the first time I heard about Bernie Sanders and I wasn't very impressed...
Can't say my opinion has changed.


The very banks he claims to opposes are the same banks that have vested interests in the federal reserve. One thing I'll give Bernie Sanders...
He plays an excellent game of mass manipulation.

Feel I need to say this again.
I support neither side of the aisle. They have become far to radicalized for my liking. People really need to start looking past the bold statements and promises if they want to really know who Bernie Sanders is and who he supports. A good start is looking at his monetary policies. But I doubt most reading this will actually take the time. Easier to just listen to him make a bunch of empty promises...


edit on 4-2-2016 by JAY1980 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 4 2016 @ 06:27 PM
link   
If Sanders makes anymore headway to the nomination i wouldn't be surprised of an untimely heart attack.

www.census.gov...

The establishment is definitely scared. Regardless of what you may believe is the correct or incorrect path the country needs to take, if the majority comes to a common point and decides to do something, anything really that will disrupt the SOP and have more people start questioning the status quo, expect a hard and sudden reaction.
edit on 2/4/2016 by MrBlasphymy because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 4 2016 @ 07:10 PM
link   
a reply to: pirhanna
Since I do not know you, I will assume that you have failed to be educated in Economics, Politics or much else. Your statement has no underpinnings.
I am willing to become more familiar with the sources that led you to this conclusion.



posted on Feb, 4 2016 @ 07:25 PM
link   
a reply to: TinfoilTP
Since you would expect no less, your meme is stupid, No Really, stupid!

If you folks who feel that helping others, without you metering their blood first (To check for non-whiteness, druggedness, genetic driftness, moral lackness.) you have undoubtedly much wrong with you.

The fact is folks who display those grotesquely distorted paradigms for social interaction are fearful. They also demonstrate dumber in every testing than their (actually superior in nearly every possible way) progressive counterparts.

So of course you hate them. You fear them. They are coming for (Name something you can not live without like really huge canisters for ammunition attached to your converted-to-auto rifles.) and will also make money and take your girl and minimize your status in every thing you think you can do.

Because you are as a class are stupid and fearful, you are also easily manipulated. 'Look at the boogieman. I will save you.', says the religious leaders and 'conservative' politicians. You rally to commit murder and mayhem to exert your limited control and to implement your limited visions.

I do not believe that anyone of my mind set can even rationalize why you behave so badly to yourselves. At this point, do you have any noses left to cut off?



posted on Feb, 4 2016 @ 07:28 PM
link   
Seriously, does anybody think America will actually elect this 78 year old Communist?
It's laughable...the whole Democratic side and their candidates are laughable.
Anyone see the Democrats "debates" recently?
LOL😭😭😭😭
They would put Communist China to shame with media bias, soft questions, fawning journalists, stage managed dissent and all the back slapping...it was genuinely embarrassing to see a superpower, a supposed first world democracy, air the farcical "debates" we've seen.
Don't get me wrong, Fox are equally biased on the whole, but there was at least a sense of tough questions, rival opinion and healthy (sometimes not so healthy) debate.
The Dems want a coronation of another dynastic entity...and I thought you guys fought to rid yourselves of all that hereditary/cronies nonsense?
Very sad.
What with the Bush and Clinton mobs you've had a virtual monopoly by a select few for decades.
And this is the nation that lectures others on democracy?
Believe it, Clinton, Sanders and their base are the extremists in this election, not Trump.


edit on 4-2-2016 by Godabove09 because: Typo.



new topics

top topics



 
50
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join