It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
While most of us were exchanging Christmas gifts and celebrating the start of a new year, Oregon Ranchers Dwight Hammond, Jr., 73, and his son, Steven Hammond, 46, were preparing for a return to prison on January 4th, 2016.
Among other things, the Hammonds were charged with various counts of Arson on federal property – punishable by a five-year mandatory minimum sentence according to the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996.
originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: malevolent
Yes, it's something ranchers have to do. They didn't do it to cover up poaching as some have tried to spin per the ridiculous DOJ report. If it was to cover up poaching the evidence would still be there to this day, a grass fire and time couldn't remove all that evidence.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: malevolent
You mean your understanding of what some people said...
Of course the people who were in trouble would say they are innocent, but the courts saw differently and say they set fire to federal property.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: malevolent
You mean your understanding of what some people said...
Of course the people who were in trouble would say they are innocent, but the courts saw differently and say they set fire to federal property.
Then, another fire set as a back fire to save the ranch was during a fire ban and burned 1 acre of federal property; again increasing the acre's value.
I apologize because I have not been able to find a link about the witness. I can't find the right keywords for a search I guess... but I know that info is out there!
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Vector99
Another judge disagrees with what. I am willing to bet he knows more about this than both of us.
The Hammonds don't want these guys there , the town doesn't want them there, who are they fighting for?
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Vector99
The Hammonds don't want these guys there , the town doesn't want them there, who are they fighting for?
The "militia" may well be a little peckish and cold, but at least they have now have plenty of lube to accompany all the dildos they've been sent in the post.
On Thursday, Max Temkin, a Chicago-based designer, posted to Twitter his order of a 55-gallon drum of person lubricant, which he kindly sent to the group many have claimed are domestic "terrorists".
"A minimum sentence mandated by the statute is not a suggestion that courts have discretion to disregard," Judge Stephen J. Murphy III wrote in the opinion. Murphy noted that even a fire in a remote area such as Harney County had the potential to spread and threaten the lives of residents and crews called out to battle the fire.
originally posted by: Vector99
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Vector99
The Hammonds don't want these guys there , the town doesn't want them there, who are they fighting for?
I wish the damn militia would go home. They did their job and brought attention to the Hammond's. Now they are staying and being a bunch of asses, completely contradicting their original purpose by constantly detracting from the initial purpose...THAT pisses me off like no other.