It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: uktorah
a reply to: Astyanax
So photons travel at the speed of light. This contradicts known physics and proves my point that all we have to go on is what we currently know.
And, no, the maths is only elegant if it fits in with what we are told.
Einstein also told us clocks work at different speeds if we travel faster, which he seems to prove. So, the speed of light must also be able to run faster or slower. It can be bent, distorted, whatever you want to call it, so is not a constant.
Therefore it can be increased, decreased, altered, therefore energy (in the form of atoms we haven't discovered yet) could travel faster than the speed of light.
So photons travel at the speed of light. This contradicts known physics and proves my point that all we have to go on is what we currently know.
So what if, when the Big Bang happened, there were infinite bendings and foldings of space time so everything could expand everywhere while still keeping speed to below the speed of light?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TerryDon79
So what if, when the Big Bang happened, there were infinite bendings and foldings of space time so everything could expand everywhere while still keeping speed to below the speed of light?
That's pretty much what's being talked about. But from the other direction. Space is getting larger at faster than the speed of light but nothing is moving at faster than the speed of light.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TerryDon79
So what if, when the Big Bang happened, there were infinite bendings and foldings of space time so everything could expand everywhere while still keeping speed to below the speed of light?
That's pretty much what's being talked about. But from the other direction. Space is getting larger at faster than the speed of light but nothing is moving at faster than the speed of light.
That's fine then lol.
Another theory I have about this is (still the same thing but in more detail), imagine a small puddle, that's our universe 13bn years ago. With the folding and bending the matter would appear OUTSIDE of the puddle. Then a few more "drops" and expansion and what was outside the puddle is now part of it again, ad infinitum.
That could certainly explain age to size difference in my views.
originally posted by: Phantom423
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TerryDon79
So what if, when the Big Bang happened, there were infinite bendings and foldings of space time so everything could expand everywhere while still keeping speed to below the speed of light?
That's pretty much what's being talked about. But from the other direction. Space is getting larger at faster than the speed of light but nothing is moving at faster than the speed of light.
That's fine then lol.
Another theory I have about this is (still the same thing but in more detail), imagine a small puddle, that's our universe 13bn years ago. With the folding and bending the matter would appear OUTSIDE of the puddle. Then a few more "drops" and expansion and what was outside the puddle is now part of it again, ad infinitum.
That could certainly explain age to size difference in my views.
Sort of an extension of your idea - listen to what Leonard Susskind says (jump to 47:00 if you don't listen to the entire lecture) about information. He's talking about black holes, but why not the universe?
Space is getting larger at faster than the speed of light but nothing is moving at faster than the speed of light.
That is exactly what happens to light when space expands. It doesn’t get older. It gets faster.
originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: spy66
Wait what???????? Light always travels at C. Thefee is no it moves faster as space expands if anything logic would say it allows down. However we know that not to be the case through observation. Any theory that changes the speed of light is in direct contradiction with observations
originally posted by: Peeple
It is like the fly in a train. The train moves through the world with 180 km/h, but the fly within also with 1m/s in the train.
Just in this case the train moves with c and the fly through the train also.
Well, according to special relativity, objects that are close together cannot move faster than the speed of light with respect to one another; however, there is no such law for objects that are extremely distant from one another when the space between them is, itself, expanding. In short, it is not that objects are traveling faster than the speed of light, but that the space between objects is expanding, causing them to fly away from each other at amazing speeds.
Because gravity keeps that from happening. The force of gravity between widely separated galaxies is not strong enough to do so.
If space expands over c generally, why then space in our own solar system did not toss away planets out where the Sun cannot assert gravitational affect on them?
That is correct.
originally posted by: greenreflections
With said above, speed of light and expansion rate of universe have nothing to do in relations with each other.
originally posted by: greenreflections
With said above, speed of light and expansion rate of universe have nothing to do in relations with each other.