It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But while Putin’s declaration sent political analysts scrambling to figure out what all this meant for Russian-American relations, it turned out that Moscow was quietly in the middle of a equally important shift, courting a new and unlikely international partner: Africa. Indeed, in recent years, this unusual relationship has strengthened to a new level as Russian investments across Africa have grown at an astounding rate. Overall trade has increased more than tenfold over the past decade or so, with exports jumping from under $950 million to $4 billion, and imports from Africa rising from $350 million to $1.6 billion. For Russia to reclaim its role as a global power after long being seen as a “junior partner” by the West, “it needed to be present in all geographies — and, of course, Africa is an increasingly important one,” says Elizabeth Sidiropoulos, chief executive of the South African Institute of International Affairs, a research organization.
Indeed, for most developed countries Africa’s growing economic importance is now impossible to overlook. In the next five years, the continent will be home to eight of the 10 fastest-growing economies, and in the next 15 years its GDP is expected to reach that of Eastern Europe. But there’s also plenty of allure today: It’s already home to some of the largest untapped reserves for minerals, oil and gas in the world.
when Vladimir Putin was elected the President, and then the Prime Minister of Russia, and along with Chinese leader Hu Jintao opposed UN Peacekeepers in Darfur. Russia strongly supports Sudan's territorial integrity and opposes the creation of an independent Darfurian state. Also, Russia is Sudan's strongest investment partner (in Europe) and political ally in Europe, and Russia has repeatedly and significantly regarded Sudan as an important global ally in the African continent.
SIPRI reports that only 8 percent of Sudanese arms are Chinese, and that Russian arms actually make up the majority, at 87 percent. Russia is the major weapons supplier to the Sudan
originally posted by: InnerPeace2012
a reply to: lostbook
Well, if anything Putin is only playing his strategies right for Russia.
The guy's a master strategist and will be remembered by the people for years to come. That is the kind of leadership that can make a difference for the Russian people.
I admire his ability to outsmart his competitors, so far his being doing everything right.
Go Putin..
originally posted by: hubrisinxs
a reply to: lostbook
Why would he say checkmate when the west is already enslaved in the global market?
If by checkmate you mean, Russia will become economically more powerful than the US, then yeah that's probably getting close to happening. Next, Russia will economically invade India if they have not already.
Research by TomDispatch indicates that in recent years the US military has, in fact, developed a remarkably extensive network of more than 60 outposts and access points in Africa. Some are currently being utilized, some are held in reserve, and some may be shuttered. These bases, camps, compounds, port facilities, fuel bunkers, and other sites can be found in at least 34 countries—more than 60 percent of the nations on the continent—many of them corrupt, repressive states with poor human rights records. The United States also operates “Offices of Security Cooperation and Defense Attaché Offices in approximately 38 [African] nations,” according to Falvo, and has struck close to 30 agreements to use international airports in Africa as refueling centers.
NY Times
adding at least $2 trillion in debt over the next 20 years
originally posted by: yuppa
YEah...till the UN approved climate controls kick in full force. then russia will be SOL because oil and gas are carbon producers right?
originally posted by: pikestaff
originally posted by: yuppa
YEah...till the UN approved climate controls kick in full force. then russia will be SOL because oil and gas are carbon producers right?
The UN climate 'controls' are so weak, they will be ignored. Chine is building a coal fired station once a week, When has China taken any notice of the UN? Tibet anyone?
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
a reply to: MrSpad
You're right. In fact, the US has a strong military presence throughout Africa. Here's an article that goes into it pretty well:
The US Military’s Best-Kept Secret
Research by TomDispatch indicates that in recent years the US military has, in fact, developed a remarkably extensive network of more than 60 outposts and access points in Africa. Some are currently being utilized, some are held in reserve, and some may be shuttered. These bases, camps, compounds, port facilities, fuel bunkers, and other sites can be found in at least 34 countries—more than 60 percent of the nations on the continent—many of them corrupt, repressive states with poor human rights records. The United States also operates “Offices of Security Cooperation and Defense Attaché Offices in approximately 38 [African] nations,” according to Falvo, and has struck close to 30 agreements to use international airports in Africa as refueling centers.
As for the OP: To be fair, Russia & China are bigger recent allies to most Africans nations anyway. People tend to forget or overlook this, but Europe conquered all of Africa except 2 nations during the "Scramble for Africa". This was from the late 1800s to the early 1900s. And some of the biggest genocides happened in these European colonies. In fact, Germany's first major genocides in the 20th century happened between 1904 & 1907 against the people of Namibia, decades before the Holocaust.
I'm mentioning this because African nations regained their independence from the West during the Cold War. China, Russia, and Cuba helped many of those revolutionary movements. Angola, for example, had 3 major factions in its civil war once Portugal left in the 1970s; 2 of those factions were CIA backed while the 3rd was communist backed. The CIA backed factions lost. So it's only natural that some African administrations would still have good relations with China & Russia. The West has treated them far worse than the East. (Ethiopia is an exception to this, because the communist DERG govt was horrific to everyone. But you get the point.)
originally posted by: lostbook
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
a reply to: MrSpad
You're right. In fact, the US has a strong military presence throughout Africa. Here's an article that goes into it pretty well:
The US Military’s Best-Kept Secret
Research by TomDispatch indicates that in recent years the US military has, in fact, developed a remarkably extensive network of more than 60 outposts and access points in Africa. Some are currently being utilized, some are held in reserve, and some may be shuttered. These bases, camps, compounds, port facilities, fuel bunkers, and other sites can be found in at least 34 countries—more than 60 percent of the nations on the continent—many of them corrupt, repressive states with poor human rights records. The United States also operates “Offices of Security Cooperation and Defense Attaché Offices in approximately 38 [African] nations,” according to Falvo, and has struck close to 30 agreements to use international airports in Africa as refueling centers.
As for the OP: To be fair, Russia & China are bigger recent allies to most Africans nations anyway. People tend to forget or overlook this, but Europe conquered all of Africa except 2 nations during the "Scramble for Africa". This was from the late 1800s to the early 1900s. And some of the biggest genocides happened in these European colonies. In fact, Germany's first major genocides in the 20th century happened between 1904 & 1907 against the people of Namibia, decades before the Holocaust.
I'm mentioning this because African nations regained their independence from the West during the Cold War. China, Russia, and Cuba helped many of those revolutionary movements. Angola, for example, had 3 major factions in its civil war once Portugal left in the 1970s; 2 of those factions were CIA backed while the 3rd was communist backed. The CIA backed factions lost. So it's only natural that some African administrations would still have good relations with China & Russia. The West has treated them far worse than the East. (Ethiopia is an exception to this, because the communist DERG govt was horrific to everyone. But you get the point.)
Thank you for your well informed contribution to my post. Much appreciated and I learned something new.
originally posted by: DeepThoughtCriminal
Although whilst we're at it, why hasn't the West taken advantage of business opportunities in Africa? Obviously there is some Western investment, but you're lagging behind Russians and Chinese.