It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

CDC exposed as private corporation

page: 1
13

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 01:27 PM
link   
According to D&B, the CDC is listed as a for profit corporation. Seems odd considering we are told its a government agency. I'm curious how the pro vaccine crowd will reply to such news but I'm sure their mercury filled brains will just write this off as a conspiracy.

Evide nce with sources
edit on 3-12-2015 by skoalman88 because: (no reason given)




posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 01:36 PM
link   
a reply to: skoalman88

Interesting, I hadn't heard of this. Kind of like the "Federal Reserve", huh?

S & F, great find!

It sounds like they work with BOTH "for-profit" and "non-profit" organizations.

My guess would be that their FOR-PROFIT partners take the priority

edit on 3-12-2015 by FamCore because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 01:38 PM
link   
a reply to: skoalman88

They are using Natural news as their source though?

On the "About" page for CDC Foundation it says:




The CDC Foundation operates independently from CDC as a private nonprofit organization.



ETA: the CDC Foundation isn't the same as the CDC - NVM!
edit on 3-12-2015 by FamCore because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 01:56 PM
link   
a reply to: skoalman88

Corporations in government are hidden everywhere.

You think that is wild...Google the Act of 1871 and read how the United States for America changed to UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Washington DC was born. The government is actually the United States, a corporation in an of itself. The IRS is also a subcorp of the United States Corp.



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 01:58 PM
link   
Very interesting. Both at the Natural News site and the OP source, they listed the Guardian and Huffington Post as sources.

From the Guardian article:


Scientists who drew up the key World Health Organisation guidelines advising governments to stockpile drugs in the event of a flu pandemic had previously been paid by drug companies which stood to profit, according to a report out today. An investigation by the British Medical Journal and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, the not-for-profit reporting unit, shows that WHO guidance issued in 2004 was authored by three scientists who had previously received payment for other work from Roche, which makes Tamiflu, and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), manufacturer of Relenza.


From the Huffington Post article:


A central figure behind the Center for Disease Control's (CDC) claims disputing the link between vaccines and autism and other neurological disorders has disappeared after officials discovered massive fraud involving the theft of millions in taxpayer dollars. Danish police are investigating Dr. Poul Thorsen, who has vanished along with almost $2 million that he had supposedly spent on research. Thorsen was a leading member of a Danish research group that wrote several key studies supporting CDC's claims that the MMR vaccine and mercury-laden vaccines were safe for children.



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 02:36 PM
link   
a reply to: skoalman88

edit on 3-12-2015 by infolurker because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 02:39 PM
link   
a reply to: skoalman88

You are being lied to. The Centers For Disease Control is a department of the federal government:


The CDC is one of the major operating components of the Department of Health and Human Services.


www.cdc.gov...

Note the "dot gov" address. A listing in Dun & Bradstreets does not mean that an organization is a for-profit corporation, it just means that it has a credit rating. Congress and the White House are also listed there. Why? In case someone wants to establish a credit account with a pizzeria or take-out restaurant so they can put meals for employees working overtime on the company tab. That's all there is to it.
edit on 3-12-2015 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 03:23 PM
link   
A US gov ltd organisation with it's own tax break foundation? Makes perfect sense to me. We have similar arrangements here in UK. Governments like to set up commercial entities to compete in commercial markets and any commercial org can create a charitable foundation for the purpose of legally siphoning money/profit that otherwise would be subject to corporate taxes.



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 03:28 PM
link   
a reply to: skoalman88

The only conspiracy this speaks to is that site is a bad source. One more to add to the list of sites to never take seriously.




posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 03:33 PM
link   
a reply to: skoalman88

Interestingly funding for federal run agencies happen to be ignore in the US, just like political figures that are elected by the people and tax payers, they all in the hands of "private benefactors".



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 04:22 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

The Federal Reserve also has a .gov website and is privately owned www.federalreserve.gov...



posted on Dec, 3 2015 @ 05:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: DJW001

The Federal Reserve also has a .gov website and is privately owned www.federalreserve.gov...


It is not privately owned, it is a hybrid. The Fed's board has to be approved by Congress.



posted on Dec, 4 2015 @ 02:30 AM
link   
a reply to: skoalman88

CDC exposed as private corporation.

Don't be surprised if they all are. Many government departments in the UK are and all 'government departments' in Australia are. They are all registered on the US Security and Exchange Commission and they all have Australian Business Numbers. Many of them even flaunt it in a discrete way by admitting they have the Australian Government as their client.



posted on Dec, 4 2015 @ 02:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Azureblue

Being registered as an entity "doing business" does not mean that an organization is a privately held for profit corporation. The Red Cross, churches, and other charitable non-profit organizations "do business," as do government agencies.



posted on Dec, 4 2015 @ 03:06 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

No problem as far as that goes but why not disclose that and make it public knowledge by putting it in their charter? Why make out they are the government. There's a bloke here who has been asking them for years to state whether or not they are public servants and for years they have refused to answer.

There is a Commonwealth law here that says a person shall be sent to prison for 2 years for impersonating a public servant if they are not a public servant.

Again, all these people when asked are they a public company or are they a commonwealth department, refuse to answer and they are supposed to be our servants!

Truth Now What The FUQ? – 52min Documentary
edit on 4-12-2015 by Azureblue because: z



new topics

top topics



 
13

log in

join