It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by UK Wizard
Which would imply that people will commit crime to fund their habit
A quick search on Google turns up some interesting information on Cannabis:
An expert on the health effects of cannabis says that there is growing evidence that the drug is responsible for mental health problems.
news.bbc.co.uk...
There are many problems with drugs that haven't even been discovered.
and a few facts on coc aine:
Cocaine is bad news for anybody with high blood pressure or a heart condition. Perfectly fit, young people can have a fit or heart attack after taking too much coke.
Too much sniffing coke and you're sneezing lumps out of your nose into a hanky.
People who use crack or coke regularly often develop serious problems with anxiety and paranoia. It's a known cause of panic attacks.
Taking coke when you're pregnant can damage your baby. Coke causes miscarriage, premature labour and smaller babies and may cause congenital abnormalities. Babies born to mothers who keep using throughout their pregnancy show withdrawal syndrome.
www.talktofrank.com...
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
It's not as if you are talking of something of great value.
Compared to the 'street price' medicinally supplied drugs cost a fraction.....and if the state could assume control of this - and it cost the state relatively speaking 'buttons' - why should the rest of us suffer the expense of the criminal activities of those who pay for their habits in this way?
- Did anyone say coc aine was completely 'wholesome' or advisable in all cases?
funny that it was when Britian was supposedly at her height too, hmm?
Originally posted by UK Wizard
If the drugs are cheaper then people will use more of it to get a better high each time they use the drug, a common problem with drugs such as coc aine is that the drug 'appears' to have a lesser effect each time it is used, so the user will use stronger doses each time.
No, but why should we legalise something we know is harmful.
So the lower classes were dosed up to their eye balls so they couldn't care less how 'crappy' their lives were.
coc aine has plummeted to £39 a gram in some areas, with the cost has halved in the last ten years.
missed some lines
Ecstasy has fallen by 70% over the last decade, and heroin now costs an average of just over £35 a gram, compared to more than £80 in the mid-nineties.
Originally posted by UK Wizard
she replied, because all drugs are harmful in one way or another
Just a point for thought
So legalised drugs would be cheaper to drive out the drugs dealers
But something tells me none of us are going to agree on the drug issue.
I'm happy with my ideas and the ideas behind my other thoughts on my web site.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
- Decriminalised or legal, cheaper clean drugs would IMHO drive out the illegal trade. Of course.
- Sadly it seems so.
A 'market' in the hands of the criminal world where young people can be exposed to God knows what or a legal regulated and controlled 'market' where the risk is far far less compared.
Originally posted by UK Wizard
But your basing your ideas on that of alcohol which has a totally different view in society
The best way is not always the easy way.
So if we legalise drugs the drugs will become:
- Cheaper
- Safer
But... how can the Government compete against drug dealers who offer cheaper prices...why would the dealers price be cheaper...because the Government is going to want a profit from the drug industry.....
The extra rehab, distribution, marketing, potential for a government vs drug dealer warfare etc is going to costs many millions if not many billions.
Government costs are going to be higher, people are going to want stronger drugs not the 'weak' stuff the Government will push, which will turn the junkies to the dodgy dealers who sell illegal hardline stuff that blows their mind...and proberly kill them.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
- The last I heard was that a £500wk heroin habit would cost the NHS less that £5wk in diamorphine ie at those kind of rates no profit whatsoever for the illegal competition.
Why do you imagine the gov regulated outlets dispensing 'weak' drugs? It will be like cigs when it happens IMHO. You will be able to buy say coc aine by strength. Say 25%, 50% or 75% pure.
In Amsterdam the decriminalised dope one can buy there is far from weak. Some of it beats most dope available here hands down in terms of strength......and many people find that too much for what they want to do and do not just by the strongest they can lay their hands on.
..and once again the truth of this is that it is not the actual drug which is toxic to most. It is the crap that is not the drug that is mixed with it or a user taking unwittingly too pure a dose that kills.
Originally posted by UK Wizard
That implies Heroin would be banned...but wait a second why would the junkies want diamorphine instead of Heroin....
Will they
I heard they decrimilised dope in Alaska but it went head over heels and drug related crime increased.....
A list of effects from coc aine:
- get headaches
- feel dizzy
- feel restless
- become violent or aggressive
- find it hard to concentrate
- lose interest in sex
- not feel like doing anything
- have chest pain
- have a heart attack
- have convulsions (fits)
nothing to do with purity or quality, the reaction is simply from the drug.
Originally posted by sardion2000
OK Interesting debate going on here so I guess I'll weigh in.
There is even some drugs in the pipeline that could remove the addiction by popping a pill(so to speak) They want to have it so they wont even get high anymore but Thats a baaad idea because thats messing with important emosional elements in your brain.
Maybe even a Boot camp type setup for the younger offenders allthough they should not be scared into shape but reasoned with, as I believe it was discovered that Scare tactics don't really work. It may work somtimes but if done multiple times it ain't working.
Like when dealing with truely addictive drugs/personalities, there are ways to tell you know I was termed one got addicted to a bunch of drugs B4 is started smoking pot, when I did that I got to know a whole different crowd and THEY the stoners SAVE MY LIFE so in my opinion Pot should be Decrimanlised
and everything else put through a Criminal Health agency or some such, NOT the regular prison system because its the prisons that turn relatively non-violent drug addicts who shoplifted or did a bne to get his next fix into a hardend criminal.
I grew up in a relatively rough neighborhood and everyone around here who knew someone who was in jail or was in jail refered to it as Criminal College. They call the Fed prison Criminal University.
Minimum security joints are called Club Feds which is where I believe the Majority of drug addicts belongs(just with a wee bit more security like locked gates )
OKAY I'm done. If anyone wants some scientific links just say the word