Juan's New Book :
In Juan Martinez new book he plans to release new evidence from the trial that was not seen by the court. Now why would he release this new
information if he wasn't trying to entice his supporters to buy his book? If what he calls "New Evidence" is actually evidence from the trial that was
not seen by the court then his new evidence would suggest to me that he is trying to create sway in the public mind with the new evidence hoping to
not only make money from his supporters but hopefully to sway the appeal judges to deny Jodi based on the new evidence in the book.
Since his new evidence was not seen by the court I would suggest thinking of the evidence as a furtherance of lies to continue to defame Jodi's
creditability in order to reduce her support thus taking away from her ability to provide herself with an outstanding appeals attorney.
If you think that Jodi still murdered Travis how would you answer these questions? The questions are all based on testimony or reports given by
roommates of Travis to Detective Steve Flores and can be read in the Flores Report. You have to do some jumping around in the report to find the
information but it is there and is an official police document.
1. Enrique Cortez Sees Travis Alive - , a roommate, said that he had seen Travis alive and walking down the stairs on the night of J0408 (June the
4th, 2008). Enrique saying that he had seen Travis would have been after Enrique had gotten home from work between 6 pm and 6:30pm. Travis being on
the phone at around this time when Enrique saw him would have put Travis close to his 7pm conference call that he was hosting. So how can Enrique say
that he had seen Travis alive when the time and date stamps of the photos show him to have been dead? Enrique later says when asked by Flores when he
thought this had happened to Travis, Enrique replies that maybe sometime on Thursday. Enrique says Thursday because when he got home from work between
6pm and 6:30 from taking the bus due to high gas prices the front door had been locked, which never is when Travis is home based on the roommates
statements as well as a doggy fence being put on Travis' stairs. Now if Enrique is lying, why would he lie? Let's say that Enrique is telling the
truth, which I believe he is for the simple matter of fact that he wouldn't have known about the photos on the camera when he gave his report because
the crime scene had not been processed yet and the evidence analyzed. Meaning that he could not have known that Travis was dead based on the time and
date stamps of the photos. If Enrique did in fact see Travis still alive around the time Travis was making the conference call then why didn't Travis
complete the call? If Travis had in fact been killed on J0408 then why didn't the killer put the doggy fence up on the stairs at that time to keep
Naps from nosing around, which is the reason it was later discovered for the doggy fence as having been put up. To keep Naps from sniffing around the
door to Travis' bedroom. The doggy fence would have been put up on J0408 which Enrique would have seen instead of Travis if Travis had in fact been
killed on J0408.
Zach another roommate later mentions that when he was coming down stairs the railing felt slick as if someone had recently cleaned it. Zach thought
Travis had been cleaning. Remember Enrique said that he had seen Travis walking down the same flight of stairs where he felt the railing was slick.
Zach also mentions that Travis was a very neat and tidy person. So if Travis had in fact been cleaning and had wiped down the railing why did he leave
the vacuum cleaner out that had been sitting in the middle of the living room floor all week long? Isn't putting away the cleaning gear part of
cleaning? I think that the hand railing was cleaned to either remove evidence of Travis putting his hand on the railing leaving behind finger and palm
prints that could be tested for age to prove that Travis was still alive based on Enrique's statement in the Flores Report or that someone other than
Travis, the two roommates and Jodi had been in the home and the railing cleaned to keep evidence from their being in the home from being discovered.
Do you still think Jodi killed Travis?
2. Zach and the Washing Machine - During the investigation Flores asks Zach about clothing in the laundry, specifically about white religious
garments. Zach says that they must either be Travis' or Enrique's. Zach also mentions that Travis would never wash his whites with coloreds. Hold up
now, Flores never mentioned anything about the laundry being mixed with coloreds and whites. Flores only mentions WHITE religious garments. So how did
Zach know that there were coloreds and whites mixed together that he made his statement based off of ? Zach jumps around three different times when he
tries to state to Flores when he did his laundry. He said that he wasn't certain if he had done his laundry on the 3rd of June, a day before the
murder and then flips between the 7th of June and the 4th of June. He couldn't have done his laundry on the 7th because he would have known about the
clothes in the laundry. On the 4th of June he was gone all morning long and returned to the house at 3 pm and then left again at 4pm to go see his
girlfriend. He didn't return until later than night on J0408. So why did Zach jump around three different times unless he knew what was in the
It should be noted that neither Zach nor Enrique were put on the stand by Martinez for these two contradictions alone as well as not being able to be
witnesses because they had appeared on T.V. thus making them both ineligible receivers downfield that would have seriously have thrown Martinez case
completely out of order and would have definitely created reasonable doubt for the jury that Jodi had killed Travis thus possibly giving Jodi that one
vote she needed to avoid being convicted in the first place.
Still think that Jodi killed Travis?
3. The Stolen Gun and Opportunity - According to Juan Jodi shot Travis with a .25 caliber handgun. The fact that Travis had been shot was proven
because a .25 caliber round nose bullet had been found at the crime scene. But when did Juan prove that Jodi shot Travis with physical evidence? Did
Juan find any evidence that he submitted to court that Jodi had stolen round nose ammo from her parents? Did Juan prove that Jodi had purchased round
nose ammo from a retail store or private seller? You know a private seller would have come forward to claim their 15 of fame as well as not wanting to
get into trouble. Juan didn't prove that Jodi had stolen the ammo from grandpa's where the gun had stolen from because the ammo at the home was hollow
points just like the ammo that was in the gun stolen. So when did Juan prove that Jodi purchased round nose bullets to replace the hollow points with?
Jodi even said that she didn't know very much about guns so why would she switch the ammo to begin with? Juan said that Jodi had opportunity. How did
Jodi have opportunity with the gun stolen from her grandparents home when the gun didn't exist at the time of the murder of Travis? Did Juan prove
that Jodi had stolen the gun?
Did Juan prove that Jodi had shot Travis with the gun that he supposedly had in the walk in closet?
When did Juan prove anything other than Jodi being at the crime scene that was proven based on the DNA and her hair being found?
edit on 24-11-2015 by Dryson because: (no reason given)