It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Willtell
What is baffling me is that imagine if Saddam Hussein, Assad, or Khadafy had done one tenth of what ISIS has done and threatened, and the West who has attacked 3 Muslim countries in 20 years, all of a sudden gets squeamish?
Use your imagination for a second:
What if Assad had done one-tenth of what ISIS is doing?
Murder French and American citizens and gloat over it
How fast would the West attack him?
The Taliban hadn’t at all threatened the West all they did was ask for proof Bin Laden was guilty
The West wasted know time in attacking Afghanistan
Imagine if Khadafy had uttered one hundredth of the threats and calumny that ISIS is and has done
How fast would they have been in Tripoli?
Also we all know that if and when the US ( God forbid) is attacked like the French were how fast will Obama’s no boots on the ground go away?
I say that all the proof, intuitive, logical, and historical precedent, is pointing to the fact that the ISIS episode is a gigantic black operation
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: Willtell
We can probably agree that war isn't the answer. I am opposed to wars except in true defense of my country. I don't believe in going to where others live and killing them indiscriminately.
What is baffling me is that imagine if Saddam Hussein, Assad, or Khadafy had done one tenth of what ISIS has done and threatened, and the West who has attacked 3 Muslim countries in 20 years, all of a sudden gets squeamish?
The Halabja chemical attack , also known as the Halabja Massacre or Bloody Friday, was a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people that took place on March 16, 1988, during the closing days of the Iran–Iraq War.
The attack killed between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injured 7,000 to 10,000 more, most of them civilians. Thousands more died of complications, diseases, and birth defects in the years after the attack
and still remains the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated area in history.
originally posted by: rjaravenheart
a reply to: Sublimecraft
Can someone explain why these Countries give the financial backing? Seems like an exercise in futility, or damn idiocy too me!
originally posted by: ladyinwaiting
a reply to: Willtell
The West's response is strange? Will, every single thing about this situation is strange.
I think most of us want to do what's right, but we are still fumbling around trying to figure out what that is!
The real reason that no-one can fight a "proper" war on Isis is because they are terrorists fighting a guerilla war. no-one actually knows who the majority of them are. Yes, the intelligence agencies probably know the main characters, but the main characters are not the ones committing these atrocities. The fundamentalist teachers are not the ones blowing themselves up (very clever of them don't you think) they have their foot soldiers doing that. And that is the problem.
originally posted by: ladyinwaiting
a reply to: Willtell
I honestly think this started with ideology, and it will have to end with the destruction of the ideology. It can be done.
How? I have no idea.
eta: Just a thought, and could be a silly one, but since all these ideas are based on a kind of 'superstition", then maybe try to fight it with superstition. Launch psychological warfare on them.