It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bicnarok
"do the math do the work" ha ha
the scientists should start doing that instead of making things up as they go along.
" things appear to be moving away from each other, that means there must have been a big bang" hasn�t got sod all to do with maths. And if you insist in using math then you have to take EVERYTHING into consideration including things which may have happened before the Humand race was even here.
Maybe the universe isn�t moving apart, but our way of measuring these things is flawed or effected by unknown things happening in the universe. The Dark Matter (non light reflecting or ommiting matter which for obvious reason cannot be see or measured) may have something to do with it.
Originally posted by bicnarok
Natural selection, that is," a dark Butterfly will become more common than a white one in a dark forest" happens, it�s been proven. This is "survival of the fittest".
The part of evolution which is a load of bollox is the "oh I don�t like being in the sea anymore I think I�ll change into something else now" thing.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
now, LOL, in regaurds to all that info on background radiation...
whew what a read!
now those are some fancy words so it takes some Very Close inspection to figure out even the first sentance much less the terminology that is in it...
Originally posted by Kidfinger
Muzzelflash,
A very thoughtful post. However, I have a small problem with your thinking.
And No conclusive evidence of Big Bangs.
I hate to be the one to burst your theory, but there IS evidence of the big bang. When the big bang occoured, the initial explosion left an imprint of sorts around our entire universe. This imprint is in the form of background radiation and was discoverd some years ago. It was discovered using a radio telescope. There is actually a funny tidbit that goes along with this. I cant remember the names of the two gentelmen who discovered this background radiation, but when they were observing this phenom, they originally concluded that bird poop on the recieving dish was causeing the effect they were witnessing. The bird poo was cleaned up, but the phenom was still there.
So yes, there is evidence that supports the Big Bang.
Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe
Well, I'm new here but it seems to me that all of these theories are just educated guesses from the population of a planet who's ventures into space are comparable to polynesian fisherman in a dugout canoe, 2000 years ago. If the Universe is infinite, how can there be a "center" to do any banging or crunching from...
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Yes Sir / Ma'am
Im here to bust a few bubbles about the misconceptions of so called "modern science"
In a nutshell im going to attack the theorys of the
1- Big Bang / Big Crunch
2- Speculations on the Age of Universe
3- Speculations on the Size of Universe
4- The Light Speed Barrier
Originally posted by masterp
If the universe was eternal, then the universe would be white instead of black, because it would be filled with light.
Could you please elaborate on why the universe would be filled with light if it was eternal?
To me, that doesnt follow logic.
If the universe were eternal, it would still be dark, because the light would never have a place to stop and reflect off of
. Also, when thinking about light, you must take into consideration the speed at which it traveled.
Enjoy
Originally posted by masterp
You could have searched the web...it's not my claim, but rather a scientific one.
Nope. If the universe was eternal, the probability of light travelling every possible path would be ...infinite. To state it simply, Earth would be bombarded with light particles from all sides, since there would be infinite light sources from all around us, having been in all possible configurations. Light would be everywhere.
Furthermore, eternal != infinite.
The speed of light does not play a role, since we are talking about an eternal universe.
By the way, an infinite/eternal universe violates the laws of thermodynamics.
The study of the laws that govern the conversion of energy from one form to another, the direction in which heat will flow, and the availability of energy to do work. It is based on the concept that in an isolated system anywhere in the universe there is a measurable quantity of energy called the internal energy (U) of the system.
Originally posted by masterp
Funny, I havent been able to find this.
Thats an awful lot of assumption you have going on there. Just because the probabiltiy is there does not mean this is what will occour. Also, agian, I can find no evidence to support your claim. Please post some.
Yes it does. The speed of light represents time as it appears.
In laymans terms, its the rules for heat conversion. How does this violate an infinite universe?
If you are going to say that " Well, if the universe is infinite, no light would ever reach us because it would have infinite heat dispersal at any distance traveled," Then please find a different argument.
My theory explains this away as our big bang is not the first, nor will it be the last.
Did you read the basic explination of the M-Theory earlier?
This means that our universe could be just following previouse paths of many other universes before it.
This is why it would still be dark in an infinite universe.
And actually, if you have ever looked through a halfway decent telescope you would see that the universe is actually not all that dark. There are MANY light sources in the form of far away stars, star nurseries, and other whole galaxies.