posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 07:13 AM
Yes Sir / Ma'am
Im here to bust a few bubbles about the misconceptions of so called "modern science"
In a nutshell im going to attack the theorys of the
1- Big Bang / Big Crunch
2- Speculations on the Age of Universe
3- Speculations on the Size of Universe
4- The Light Speed Barrier
In this treatise I will be upholding the Scientific Method
I will be attacking "old world" ideas offered in Physics over 50 years ago , sometimes even as far back as over 100 years ago.
I will not use any fancy math to prove my point. It is unnessasary and I myself am not schooled aduquately in the mathematical portions Quantum
Physics, Cosmology, String Theory, or other fields of Physics. I have a basic knowledge of the subjects but I consult with Physicists about my
Questions and I pay close attention to their Theorys.
If anyone uses math i can follow but when it comes to writing it myself i find it painful and timewasting.
I have presented my ideas /speculation to some very prestegious Physicists. And as far as I can recall, None have presented me with a "Your
Incorrect". In fact most say "Perhaps So".
Anyhow, On with the 'show.
1- The Big Bang /Big Crunch theory.
In essence , I would deem this theory a "Monotheists attempt to use science to validate Religion.
Western Religion claims that there was a Begining , and there will be an End.
The big bang states that The ENTIRE universe was once crushed into an infinitly small space.
And then one day alas, it Exploded and out flew all the matter which the present Universe is composed of. This theory relies heavily on the concept of
Gravity presented by Newton. Because as the theory states, the universe will expand to a point, and then eventually all the gravity will eventually
pull all the galaxies back into that same infinitely small space. A big Crunch, as they say.
Whats wrong with this theory you ask? Well, saddly, Everything in this theory is inconsistant with itself. Its illogical in my opinion, and now I will
tell you WHY.
The existance of Black Holes.
In a black hole, supposedly, so much matter has accumulated in such a small area that the Gravity grew so strong that NOT even Light Could Escape! I
am however aware that X-rays do escape the black holes. You can correct me on the Xray thing, it may be gamma but thats beside the point.
Heres my Logic.
If Every single spec of matter in the ENTIRE universe collapsed into a point of 'singularity' it wouldnt be a "Big Bang" it would be a "Big Black
There is currently NO EVIDENCE that black holes explode and all the matter inside of them expells into the surrounding space. I dont even think there
is a theory regaurding such phenomena.
Why Would a near infinitely large black hole 'decide' to just explode? What makes the singularity reverse?? The Big Bang scenario fails to recognize
Black Hole Theory becauase at the time the Big Bang was proposed, the ideas of Black Holes were unheard of. It wasnt well known.
But nowdays in 2005 we have ample evidence of Black Holes. And No conclusive evidence of Big Bangs.
Just think about it; every single planet star moon asteroid rock spec of dust every subatomic particle even EVERY Black Hole was squeezed into a small
little tiny space.
That doesnt make much sense!!!!!
It would just be a Back Hole And it probably wouldnt explode into a massive universe either.
If a small, miniture black hole such as those discovered at the center of the milkyway galaxy cannot gain the 'fortitude' to Explode outwards and
eject its mass ; than what makes one think that a super massive near infinite mass- black hole would?
I have even go so far as to ask Physics professors and the like about this very INCONSISTANCY.
I will quote Michio Kaku (one of the founders of string theory-books Hyperspace and Visions)
"well jason, you have a point"
great quote huh?
he did mention however that there is a wonderful mathematical equation that i could never comprehend that attempts to explain the Reason WHY the super
black hole "exploded" and thus the Universe was Born. But he himself suggested that the formula was just speculation, as is my theory.
I didnt use math to come to this point; it was just a logical idea that struck me one day.
Black Holes and Big Bangs dont Mix.
I will suggest that however; it is possible that the entire universe Is a black hole; and it expands inwards infinitly and we are inside of that
massive black hole. But this is just a far fetched notion and i will not entertain it further.
Now on to my next bubble buster.
2 - Age and Size of Universe
Scientists have popularly suggested that the universe is anywhere from 12 to 20 billion years old.
How did they arrive at such a miraculus number? How did they figure that out you ask?
Simple they say; our telescopes only pick up light from objects 6 to 8 billion light years away.
In all directions.
Oh well; how convienant. Earth is Once agian at the CENTER of the UNIVERSE???
This is amazing because humans have been claiming that for our entire existance.
We think we are very special indeed, and being at the Center of the Universe is a big Plus.
Heres the Logic.
If we can see the same distance no matter which Direction we look, doesnt that mean we are at the very Center of the Universe? HAHA
Now, may i suggest, that we are just making inferior judgements based on our Inferior telescopes?
Perhaps our current methods of telescope construction are limited , therefor our telescopes can only see a certain distance.
Just because our telescopes cannot see further away than 8 billion light years does NOT imply that everything beyond that point is non-existant.
What about the Red Shift Jason?
Well, lets talk about Red Shift . This helps me disprove the big bang theory even further.
Why is it that All galaxies show a Red Shift?
The primitive earth scientists claim that ALL galaxies show a "Red Shift" suggesting that it represents All of those Galaxies MOVING AWAY from
Well agian we are at the center of the Universe!!!!
If ALL galaxies show a red shift; that means we are at the VERY CENTER and all these galaxies are moving away from Earth!!!
May i suggest; the Red Shift is misunderstood in entirety? Because it makes NO sense at all.
IF there was a big bang; and red shift could accurately calculate the movements of galaxies; we COULD find the central point of the Universe. It would
be simple; some galaxies would be moving our way; with our galaxy; and some would be moving away.
Basically; it would seem to me that there would be a ball shaped expansion.
Not to mention those countless Hubble photos of galaxies COLLIDING! they are crashing into each other in unimaginable massive violent collisions! How
could Galaxies Collide if they are all MOVING AWAY from each other??
If you have followed me this far; you should soon realize there is NO real Scientific way to gauge the AGE or SIZE of the Universe!
Its virtually impossible! There is no way of figuring this out in certainty.
Based on these inconsistancies , the Big bang theory is chalk full of contradictory ideas.
Since the methods used to determine the Size and Age of the Universe are just extensions of the Big Bang theory ; they all fall to pieces under true
It just doesnt make logical sense. And it shouldnt. Humans are arrogant. They overlook too many things. No one is Perfect. It comes as no surprise
that; the Big bang theory is in controversy with Black Hole theory, and thus its no surprise that our calculations on the age or size of the universe
are in controversy with Logic.
Now we shall preceed onwards in our endevor...
3- The Light Speed Barrier
Many great minds in this century have claimed there is a "Light Speed Barrier"! They claim that NOTHING can go faster than Light! Why? Because of
special relativity! When an object approaches the speed of light; time virtually "stops" and the mass of that object approaches infinity!
Now; even if special relativity holds true; how the Hell does that make it impossible to go faster than light speed??(FTL)
From where im sitting; it seems; that IF an objects mass approaches Infinity; that will be just like a super massive ultra sized Black Hole. Something
with that type of mass, INFINITE mass; would just suck the whole dang universe up in less than a nano second.
Already we can see there is an Adverse consequence to FTL speed; but that in no way means its Impossible!
Oh but dear, the contradictions flush into the equation turning it into mathematical goo.
There is a Law of Physics that I believe in wholeheartedly.
The LAW of CONSERVATION of MASS and ENERGY.
It states that you cannot destroy nor create energy. And no one has disproved it with sufficient evidence to this date.
How could an objects mass approach infinity? Does this mean that every atom has within itself INFINITE potential energy? Is every object capable of
infinite kinetic energy as long as we just make it go faster than light ???
I seriously doubt it.
Now another great point. Entropy.
Heres my example of why FTL travel is Possible. Again ive consulted with Physicists and offered my ideas and as of yet; None have countered my
arguement with a counter point. Most say its Possible. Perhaps.
Ok; we are in a space ship. And we are so deep in space that virtually NO gravity is acting on our spacecraft. So we are just 'floating' in a
So we turn on the rocket engine. Just for a second.
We are now moving forward at 500 mph.
Now our engines are Off.
We are still hurling forward at 500mph.
There is no forces acting agianst us; so we continue to fly forward at 500mph.
Now, we turn on our engine agian.
Since our craft was in entropy, we should now be going Twice as fast. *it may be more like a calculus curve but it doesnt matter* for sake of point
bear with me.
SO we are now going 1000 mph.
Engines off, we still float foward at 1000mph.
Repeat this over and over. And eventually you should reach Light Speed. and Beyond
Now as i state this theory i feel uneasy with it because i am Unsure of this myself. But it does seem to have some sense in it.
Plus lets not forget that RELATIVITY means everything is Relative!
So when they say the craft would "appear" to have its mass reach infinity and "time would slow down" this is Just Relative!
To the man inside the craft it probably seems like normal Time and Normal Mass.
Agian relativity means that your Point of View determines your Perspective of the situation.
So that from here it may seem impossible and breaks the "laws of physics" but from inside the spaceship going warp5 , it may seem very possible.
From outside things may be a blur, but from inside things may seem stationary.
Honestly when it comes to FTL i am very unsure as to the Reality of it.
No Humans are. We arent technologically or mentally advanced enough to know what Really Happens.
But i will say that i do NOT believe in a "light speed barrier"
Perhaps my examples on FTL are flawed; and they very well may be.
But i will say its arrogant and foolish of us to claim
"There is a Light speed Barrier and even God himself cannot go faster than Light!"
that is just Rubbish!
THERE IS no EVIDENCE to prove it!!!
What IS evident however; is that humans claim more than they actually know!
Until we make a spaceship that can approach FTL speeds, we will Never know !
Now you can flame and bash me all you want.
If you have any Q's or A's speak up.
ill be around to listen and reply