Conspiracy Moon Landing....On TV right now!

On NTGEO right now....they are building a fake moon landing to test theories.....looks interesting!

Dam didnt see that. Was it any good?

It was great, it de bunked almost every conspiracy myth, nad when they were explained, it did make alot of sense. IT is definitely worth watching no matter how you feel. Personaly, I trust Buzz Aldrin.

Thanks for the info

I saw bits and pieces of it last night...fairly well done. badastronomy.com pretty much does the same job for those still believing the hoax conspiracy...

Did it cover the footage shown in the film 'A funny thing happened on the way to the moon' where the astronauts are seen hoaxing pictures of the earth from a distance while actually still in earth orbit?

Not that I am saying that they didn't go... just wondering if it was covered as it is the only part of the consipracy/hoax theories regarding the moon landings that still bothers me.

We never get good shows here in OZ.

Of course they went but I am not sure ALL the pictures and footage that came back was quite accurate for reasons that may or may not become apparent.
Anything can be faked if it has to be. When you are dealing with governments and supposed higher governments - we'll never know until they want us to know. Not saying don't go looking for info, because one thing is constant - humans will always make mistakes.

Some of the intercepted radio transmissions by ham radio operators on the apollo missions were interesting. I will provide a link soon.

yeah, I live in Oz, I wish I had Pay TV!! Something like Foxtel would be good, which has the science fiction channel. What things did they say about the moon landing being fake?? A shadow in the background or something?

I thought it was pretty good, but saw some things I didn't agree with. When they were explaining that the reason the flag was blowing in a breeze was because the flag was on two flexible poles that went one inside the other and that kept moving after you touched it....made no sense to me....it moved differently when the pole was touched, it did not "wave" the way it did in the original moon shots...it more flickered than waved.

Originally posted by LadyV
I thought it was pretty good, but saw some things I didn't agree with. When they were explaining that the reason the flag was blowing in a breeze was because the flag was on two flexible poles that went one inside the other and that kept moving after you touched it....made no sense to me....it moved differently when the pole was touched, it did not "wave" the way it did in the original moon shots...it more flickered than waved.

did the film it in near zero gravity ?

Still amazing that no one mentions nor takes into account that the Russian's, and others, monitored the NASA messages/transmissions....
As mentioned on the show, and as has been mentioned within this board on the topics of the Moon Landing (within the Military & Government Projects Forum, within a INDEX), if NASA had made the Moon Landing a hoax, the Russian's, as with others who monitored and listened in, would have publically stated such and announced it throughout the world.

They did not. Amazing that we have rovers on Mars, probes in space, other recorded and documented manned-space travels to the moon, and into space, but the Moon landing hoax still goes around...interesting. Embracing ignorance, indeed, eh?





seekerof

I don't know if it's a hoax or not...I would assume that no, it is not.....but I find a lot of the issues that the hoax believers bring up to be interesting too......I'm open minded both ways...

Originally posted by Seekerof
They did not. Amazing that we have rovers on Mars, probes in space, other recorded and documented manned-space travels to the moon, and into space, but the Moon landing hoax still goes around...interesting. Embracing ignorance, indeed, eh?

"Everything has been said before, but since nobody listens we have to keep going back and beginning all over again."
-Andre Gide

Threads of last week in Fragile Earth forum should be enough to tell that.


"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so."
-Douglas Adams
"Man is a credulous animal, and must believe something; in the absence of good grounds for belief, he will be satisfied with bad ones."
-Bertrand Russell

Somehow I tend to agree with these gentlemans.


"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
-Albert Einstein

The number one thing that confirms that there is/was no hoax regarding the first moon landing (or subsequent moon landings) is called the Union of Soviet Socialist Rebublics.

If a person thinks for a second that the USSR/CCCP would have stood by quietly and let their sworn enemy, the USA, perpetrate a hoax to win the race to the moon - during the height of the cold war - that person is delusional.

There was a release on bbc radio that a file released by the uk governmnet prooves that there was an English pilot who replaced an injured American astronaut on the Apollo 11 moon lading mission...?? any bodyknow any more about this?

thanks in advance

Originally posted by acidhead

Originally posted by LadyV
I thought it was pretty good, but saw some things I didn't agree with. When they were explaining that the reason the flag was blowing in a breeze was because the flag was on two flexible poles that went one inside the other and that kept moving after you touched it....made no sense to me....it moved differently when the pole was touched, it did not "wave" the way it did in the original moon shots...it more flickered than waved.

did the film it in near zero gravity ?

and in a vacuum, with no atmosphere to dampen the motion of the material?

LadyV, I think they went to the Moon, but what has caused the Hoax controversy is that some of the images we got to see were faked to cover up what they were really doing on the Moon. Take for example the entire Apollo 12 mission when Navy Captain Alan Bean couldn't get the video camera to work. What Bean was actually doing at the time was "...install(ing) the first nuclear power generator station on the moon...". In that case, the Agency 'failed' the live video for an entire mission to cover up classified technology deployment.

I think the most telling thing about Apollo is the silence emanating from Neil Armstrong.

Uh, yeah. All of the equipmtnet that was left in place to run ongoing experimnets was run off of nuclear batteries. There was nothing special about that.

This is what I was trying to get at in my other post Russia HAS a military Base on the Dark side of the moon, read Dr. Beter's articles I beleive there are colonize on other planets but the Apollo missions were fake they Rus/U.S. went to the moon and other planets with much higher tech than what they show, P.S. What's the tempreture on the moon's surface?By the way what is the NTGEO channel?

[edit on 7-2-2005 by SiberianTiger]

Originally posted by Chakotay
LadyV, I think they went to the Moon, but what has caused the Hoax controversy is that some of the images we got to see were faked to cover up what they were really doing on the Moon. Take for example the entire Apollo 12 mission when Navy Captain Alan Bean couldn't get the video camera to work. What Bean was actually doing at the time was "...install(ing) the first nuclear power generator station on the moon...". In that case, the Agency 'failed' the live video for an entire mission to cover up classified technology deployment.

I think the most telling thing about Apollo is the silence emanating from Neil Armstrong.

They missed (or nearly missed, I don't recall) a broadcast from the Huygen's probe that was 18 years in the making because someone forgot to turn on the transmitter. We lost a probe because we forgot to change from feet to meters. I find the idea that a video camera back in the 60's breaking extremely plausible.