posted on Oct, 2 2015 @ 05:26 PM
a reply to: Jonjonj
I have not been moving the goal posts all thread. This is the OP...
Browsing through many different media sites and uk TV chat shows I am amazed and furious that the idiotic idea of not naming the person who murdered
all of those people. The reason fed to us is that they will not give him the fame. Are the public that stupid and gullible to believe this? Do they
not realise that this info will come out?
Is this some kind of social media experiment to see how fast information can spread without the help of the msm?
Either way the msm have NO RIGHT to decide what parts of a story will be released under the pretense it's for our own good.
Should this not be stopped now before it is the accepted thing among the mass?
It sets out clearly that I am unhappy that the media have decided to withhold the killers name. There is nothing to do with repeating his name and
giving him airtime. The purpose as set out in the OP is that information is being controlled and manipulated.
Why do you think your post that you "feel like I am talking to a neophyte" was apt?
Am I a neophyte of this subject of mass murders? Am I a neophyte to the idea of a debate? Am I a neophyte to the use of words that serve no purpose
in posts such as neophyte?
As I was the creator of the thread I would be the opposite of a neophyte as my OP sets the tone and direction of the thread. Therefore I will suggest
you are the neophyte in that you are new to the idea of a proper debate and understanding basic points.
That is the last time I will ever use the word neophyte again as it is useless and 99% of the people I communicate with don't use it or have never