It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Worse is to find said pill is available in Mexico for a paltry $10 a pill.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Phoenix
So you want "congress" to work together to undo what they did which would lose many of them support from pharma companies.
Sanders as a supposed independent (wink wink) could have presented bills to do just that though and gotten away with it, the question is did he?
originally posted by: EternalSolace
a reply to: Grimpachi
This should help support my point.
Is The FDA Being Compromised By Pharma Payments?
The FDA isn't funded by Pharma.
The GOP wants to change that though. They want to let Pharma companies pay the FDA to expedite approvals for medications.
If that happened your statement could have validity.
“The forthcoming article in JLME also presents systematic, quantitative evidence that since the industry started making large contributions to the FDA for reviewing its drugs, as it makes large contributions to Congressmen who have promoted this substitution for publicly funded regulations, the FDA has sped up the review process with the result that drugs approved are significantly more likely to cause serious harm, hospitalizations, and deaths.”
My point in this thread is obvious, Sanders, hearing the outcry on Hedge raising generic pricing trotted out a new/old plan on pharma as a sop to the socialist base in hopes of gaining some polling points.
That's reactive pandering IMHO
You trotted out Vids showing he always wanted social pharma.