It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The part that sealed it for me was the guys head blocking the light as he passed in front of the camera.
Still not convinced that there might be an issue of this being filmed behind glass or plastic, but if that were true the camera would have to stay the exact same distance from it or the supposed reflected image would skew noticeably as he jittered the camera.
I also want to add the reflection from the light in the bottom right is seen through tree branches shaking lightly in a breeze, giving the further effect of winking and blinking as the light is filtered by the branches and leaves.
The part that sealed it for me was the guys head blocking the light as he passed in front of the camera.
Whether or not he filmed this in the open or behind a plastic or glass (say an open door) could explain the sheen and other lights appearing smeared as they pass by, (autos).
Have no idea why anyone would come here and defend an obvious hoax.
Sorry, Mike Pittaro. Have to call it as I see it.
originally posted by: game over man
a reply to: MikePittaro74
How come you completely left out the most important part of how the orbs left the scene?
The photos and video were never intended for the general public. They were shared with close friends on Facebook because we both (my wife and I) felt the event was amazing, but spooky at the same time, and felt our close friends would be interested in what we filmed.)
My wife and I live a very quiet life together, and we DID NOT want ANY of the footage to reach the public. Quite frankly, I don't want to be known as some crazy 'NH Man That Chases lights in the sky
I watched the debunk vid..
Maybe Im wrong but if it was a lens flair wouldnt it move as his camera shakes and moves?
When his camera shakes and moves, it stays in the exact same spot
I cannot fathom why he would have logged on here to talk about it if it were something he did purposefully…that part just makes no sense.
originally posted by: Lucidparadox
I watched the debunk vid..
Maybe Im wrong but if it was a lens flair wouldnt it move as his camera shakes and moves?
When his camera shakes and moves, it stays in the exact same spot