It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The question of the "Big Bang", would most likely be, that it came from a previous "Bang". You could have like Bang, Crunch, Bang, Crunch, Bang, Crunch.....
originally posted by: DerekJR321
Funny.. I was just looking for videos about this last night.
I was asking from a scientific viewpoint, but unfortunately only found religious connections. My question was, if the big bang started it all, where did the matter from the big bang come from? The closest I got was "dark matter". Okay.. where did the dark matter come from?
Sometimes I wonder if we even really exist. We live in a reality that we create for ourselves.
That is the general ideal, One massive Black Hole, The Singularity, it seems that once it has contained the entire Universe, it reaches a critical state, that it can no longer hold itself together.
originally posted by: spy66
a reply to: OOOOOO
If in the beginning all the matter that make up Our universe was gathered into one singel singularity (energy mass)... would that mean the singularity initially was a black hole, that lost its mass and expanded?
All the mass that made up the singularity would probably make one hell of a black hole.....
originally posted by: OOOOOO
That is the general ideal, One massive Black Hole, The Singularity, it seems that once it has contained the entire Universe, it reaches a critical state, that it can no longer hold itself together.
originally posted by: spy66
a reply to: OOOOOO
If in the beginning all the matter that make up Our universe was gathered into one singel singularity (energy mass)... would that mean the singularity initially was a black hole, that lost its mass and expanded?
All the mass that made up the singularity would probably make one hell of a black hole.....
Time, at that point seem to matter little, as there is no point of perspective, unless you were the One, beyond this Universe and having all perspectives.
originally posted by: spy66
originally posted by: OOOOOO
That is the general ideal, One massive Black Hole, The Singularity, it seems that once it has contained the entire Universe, it reaches a critical state, that it can no longer hold itself together.
originally posted by: spy66
a reply to: OOOOOO
If in the beginning all the matter that make up Our universe was gathered into one singel singularity (energy mass)... would that mean the singularity initially was a black hole, that lost its mass and expanded?
All the mass that made up the singularity would probably make one hell of a black hole.....
Time, at that point seem to matter little, as there is no point of perspective, unless you were the One, beyond this Universe and having all perspectives.
Ok. I am fallowing.
But how did all the particles suddenly compress into the energy mass (singularity)?
What force caused all the particles that were scattered billions of light years apart to compress into a singularity?
It couldnt have been a black hole. Because if all the particles are scattered billions of light years apart... there is no black hole....there is no mass. Only a wast void of vacuum Space.
originally posted by: Kandinsky
a reply to: spy66
Stephen Hawking described it in a way that I can't forget. Comparing the Big Bang to the South Pole, he wrote that we can only go so far south before we can't travel any further south. With regards to what occurred prior to the 'Big Bang,' we can't 'travel' any further than that moment.
Doesn't Hawking believe the Universe, just popped in from nowhere.
originally posted by: Kandinsky
a reply to: OOOOOO
Doesn't Hawking believe the Universe, just popped in from nowhere.
No. He argues that we can only 'see' so far into the beginning of this universe hence the 'South Pole' point I referred to.
ETA - sorry if I came over a bit arsey there. The multiverse ideas are interesting and yet they're currently like angels dancing on the head of a pin. I've been reading New Scientist for years and they've published lots of articles about the search for evidence. However, so far, they haven't panned out and that's fine because the value of science is held in being wrong as much as it is in being accurate.
What is really asinine, is that,in the Multiverse they are are all talking about, they say you would be this in one, that in another, dead in that one, a king this one. I think that is all bull, I don't see it that way, you will never have a separate Universe just so you can have purple hair.
Well, we better start measuring right away.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
What's interesting is that recent experiments suggest that reality doesn't exist unless it's measured.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: OOOOOO
But I don't know you exist...
If I can't see it, it's not a part of my reality...or is it?
www.francislucille.com...
What I am saying here is in fact very simple: our seemingly ordinary consciousness, the one that perceives the events of our daily life, is in fact extraordinary, universal, eternal and divine. It is the Ultimate reality of all things and of ourselves, the Absolute. This is the open secret, for all to see, known only by one.
originally posted by: Kandinsky
a reply to: spy66
Stephen Hawking described it in a way that I can't forget. Comparing the Big Bang to the South Pole, he wrote that we can only go so far south before we can't travel any further south. With regards to what occurred prior to the 'Big Bang,' we can't 'travel' any further than that moment.
According to special relativity, c is the maximum speed at which all matter and information in the universe can travel. It is the speed at which all massless particles and changes of the associated fields (including electromagnetic radiation such as light and gravitational waves) travel in vacuum.