It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JadeStar
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
right. "not much of a cheese shop then is it?"
Why does every "I have a secret." end up with poorly written espionage silliness?
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
originally posted by: Triton1128
a reply to: stormbringer1701
His reply isn't aimed at NASA, SPACE X, BOEING, ect..
Listen to the question. This pertains to a secret space force/fleet AND a hidden military base on the moon. He specifically says .. We have one, Its there. A space force. It exists. Then the speaker follows up stating. Some acknowledge it, some don't.
His answer is aimed at the previous question. Its cut and dry. I'm just curious if this "comment" was intentional or not
Well I'd love for it to be true but there is no way such a thing could be hidden from all of humanity including astronomers and physicists. there would be effects that would be detectable particularly when they are operating in our own solar system. effects that we would not be able to ignore or rationalize.
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
If any of you have seen a BBT, you'd know they don't need solid rockets to get into orbit anymore . I've seen one of these things, they're decades upon decades ahead of NASA.
dependant on the propulsion scheme. warps drives have a high probability of producing x rays gamma rays einstein rings or cherenkov radiation. Wormhole type drives would have an Einstein ring possible variations in background radiation, and due to cosmic back reaction might develop unusually physical properties such as negative energy or mass. they would also create a weird one poled magnetic signature (essentially a worm hole acts as a giant magnetic monopole and both might create anomolous gravitational nudges on small bodies or satellites. if electrons came through from the other end positrons or even physical nonsensical holes might come through. according to some theories any particle that goes through is inverted left to right and up and down and this includes quark make up.
originally posted by: AllIsOne
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
originally posted by: Triton1128
a reply to: stormbringer1701
His reply isn't aimed at NASA, SPACE X, BOEING, ect..
Listen to the question. This pertains to a secret space force/fleet AND a hidden military base on the moon. He specifically says .. We have one, Its there. A space force. It exists. Then the speaker follows up stating. Some acknowledge it, some don't.
His answer is aimed at the previous question. Its cut and dry. I'm just curious if this "comment" was intentional or not
Well I'd love for it to be true but there is no way such a thing could be hidden from all of humanity including astronomers and physicists. there would be effects that would be detectable particularly when they are operating in our own solar system. effects that we would not be able to ignore or rationalize.
Can you give an example?
By modeling a hot blob of plasma trapped in the warped spacetime surrounding a black hole and a wormhole, Li and Bambi noticed two very different emission signatures that both cases will generate. A wormhole would generate a “very narrow emission line,” whereas a black hole would have spectra that is “broad and skewed as a result of special and general relativistic effects,” they write.
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
dependant on the propulsion scheme. warps drives have a high probability of producing x rays gamma rays einstein rings or cherenkov radiation. Wormhole type drives would have an Einstein ring possible variations in background radiation, and due to cosmic back reaction might develop unusually physical properties such as negative energy or mass. they would also create a weird one poled magnetic signature (essentially a worm hole acts as a giant magnetic monopole and both might create anomolous gravitational nudges on small bodies or satellites. if electrons came through from the other end positrons or even physical nonsensical holes might come through. according to some theories any particle that goes through is inverted left to right and up and down and this includes quark make up.
originally posted by: AllIsOne
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
originally posted by: Triton1128
a reply to: stormbringer1701
His reply isn't aimed at NASA, SPACE X, BOEING, ect..
Listen to the question. This pertains to a secret space force/fleet AND a hidden military base on the moon. He specifically says .. We have one, Its there. A space force. It exists. Then the speaker follows up stating. Some acknowledge it, some don't.
His answer is aimed at the previous question. Its cut and dry. I'm just curious if this "comment" was intentional or not
Well I'd love for it to be true but there is no way such a thing could be hidden from all of humanity including astronomers and physicists. there would be effects that would be detectable particularly when they are operating in our own solar system. effects that we would not be able to ignore or rationalize.
Can you give an example?
worm holes also have a energy spectrum signature according to:
news.discovery.com...
By modeling a hot blob of plasma trapped in the warped spacetime surrounding a black hole and a wormhole, Li and Bambi noticed two very different emission signatures that both cases will generate. A wormhole would generate a “very narrow emission line,” whereas a black hole would have spectra that is “broad and skewed as a result of special and general relativistic effects,” they write.
also Dr Kramer of WU provided a lecture at an exotic propulsion symposium and during Q & A physicists who had modeled light going through a wormhole by sophisticated ray tracing computer rendering routines provided the description of what a worm hole would look like and what could be seen in one from which i posted some of the above information.
there is only so much room for new physics to come from though.there are several quasi-fringe candidates such as the EM drive, Mach Effect Thrusters, magnetogravitics, and so forth that have serious credentialed investigators that would also allow something like FTL travel. See even the best future conventional physics drives that might get to some sort of tech readiness level above zero would still take years to get to the nearest stars so you need something that gets around the restrictions of physics as we understand them if you want interstellar travel to become routine or even possible. some of the best if controversial candidates are warp drive schemes and wormhole schemes. mind you most physicists would laugh at even mentioning such things in serious way depite the growing body of research and data.
originally posted by: AllIsOne
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
dependant on the propulsion scheme. warps drives have a high probability of producing x rays gamma rays einstein rings or cherenkov radiation. Wormhole type drives would have an Einstein ring possible variations in background radiation, and due to cosmic back reaction might develop unusually physical properties such as negative energy or mass. they would also create a weird one poled magnetic signature (essentially a worm hole acts as a giant magnetic monopole and both might create anomolous gravitational nudges on small bodies or satellites. if electrons came through from the other end positrons or even physical nonsensical holes might come through. according to some theories any particle that goes through is inverted left to right and up and down and this includes quark make up.
originally posted by: AllIsOne
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
originally posted by: Triton1128
a reply to: stormbringer1701
His reply isn't aimed at NASA, SPACE X, BOEING, ect..
Listen to the question. This pertains to a secret space force/fleet AND a hidden military base on the moon. He specifically says .. We have one, Its there. A space force. It exists. Then the speaker follows up stating. Some acknowledge it, some don't.
His answer is aimed at the previous question. Its cut and dry. I'm just curious if this "comment" was intentional or not
Well I'd love for it to be true but there is no way such a thing could be hidden from all of humanity including astronomers and physicists. there would be effects that would be detectable particularly when they are operating in our own solar system. effects that we would not be able to ignore or rationalize.
Can you give an example?
worm holes also have a energy spectrum signature according to:
news.discovery.com...
By modeling a hot blob of plasma trapped in the warped spacetime surrounding a black hole and a wormhole, Li and Bambi noticed two very different emission signatures that both cases will generate. A wormhole would generate a “very narrow emission line,” whereas a black hole would have spectra that is “broad and skewed as a result of special and general relativistic effects,” they write.
also Dr Kramer of WU provided a lecture at an exotic propulsion symposium and during Q & A physicists who had modeled light going through a wormhole by sophisticated ray tracing computer rendering routines provided the description of what a worm hole would look like and what could be seen in one from which i posted some of the above information.
Thank you for taking the time to answer me. Maybe you're assuming too much? Could it be that the prop system is based on "new" physics?
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
If any of you have seen a BBT, you'd know they don't need solid rockets to get into orbit anymore . I've seen one of these things, they're decades upon decades ahead of NASA.
originally posted by: sapien82
a reply to: stormbringer1701
In order to detect such signatures wouldn't that require equipment set up specifically to detect these.
In other words we would need scientists with equipment set up to specifically detect if someone has secret space craft.
Every other experiment is looking for something specific and wouldn't likely detect something by accident surely!
originally posted by: AllIsOne
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
If any of you have seen a BBT, you'd know they don't need solid rockets to get into orbit anymore . I've seen one of these things, they're decades upon decades ahead of NASA.
What is a BBT?
originally posted by: stormbringer1701also Dr Kramer of WU provided a lecture at an exotic propulsion symposium and during Q & A physicists who had modeled light going through a wormhole by sophisticated ray tracing computer rendering routines provided the description of what a worm hole would look like and what could be seen in one from which i posted some of the above information.
originally posted by: sapien82
a reply to: tanka418
I was referring specifically to current detection of signals , what i'm saying is how would anyone know what to look for as they don't know what drive systems these so called black project ships have so therefore the detection of such signals would unlikely happen as no one is looking for them.
Also i'm sure if they wanted to remain stealth they would mask their signals with common space based signals which happen all the time.
Dr Kramer's presentation and the Q & A session are on youtube. you can sift it for details. it is entirely possible you will see something i missed or forgot about. one of the Q & A persons was Paul Davies by the way there was also an interesting bit about the portrayal of the black hole for Sagan's movie Contact. Science Consultants were used then ignored when they came up with something other than the classic bathtub drain whirlpool.
originally posted by: tanka418
originally posted by: stormbringer1701also Dr Kramer of WU provided a lecture at an exotic propulsion symposium and during Q & A physicists who had modeled light going through a wormhole by sophisticated ray tracing computer rendering routines provided the description of what a worm hole would look like and what could be seen in one from which i posted some of the above information.
Sophisticated "ray tracing"...you mean like what is built in to virtually every 3D rendering engine today?
Reading things like this make it seem like a great deal of something other than engineering went into it, however, that is not necessarily the case.
Many times a ray tracing method is far from accurate. And, then little details like the number of rays and "bounces" become significant.
Do you have, or have you ever seen any of the details about the "physics engine" used? Did they build a custom engine, or use the one contained in a modern graphics card? If custom; who wrote it? In what language? By the way; IF written by a physicist; don't use a grain of salt...use the whole damn mine!
originally posted by: tanka418
originally posted by: stormbringer1701also Dr Kramer of WU provided a lecture at an exotic propulsion symposium and during Q & A physicists who had modeled light going through a wormhole by sophisticated ray tracing computer rendering routines provided the description of what a worm hole would look like and what could be seen in one from which i posted some of the above information.
Sophisticated "ray tracing"...you mean like what is built in to virtually every 3D rendering engine today?
Reading things like this make it seem like a great deal of something other than engineering went into it, however, that is not necessarily the case.
Many times a ray tracing method is far from accurate. And, then little details like the number of rays and "bounces" become significant.
Do you have, or have you ever seen any of the details about the "physics engine" used? Did they build a custom engine, or use the one contained in a modern graphics card? If custom; who wrote it? In what language? By the way; IF written by a physicist; don't use a grain of salt...use the whole damn mine!
originally posted by: dogstar23
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
If any of you have seen a BBT, you'd know they don't need solid rockets to get into orbit anymore . I've seen one of these things, they're decades upon decades ahead of NASA.
BBT? Best I can come up with searching online is either the show "Big Bang Theory", or BB&T Bank.
originally posted by: sirChill
originally posted by: tanka418
Sophisticated "ray tracing"...you mean like what is built in to virtually every 3D rendering engine today?
He was going to say vector graphic, but figured that wasn't hip enough.