It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: ArnoldNonymous
The Curiosity rover mission was originally scheduled for two years but as seen with Opportunity rover who's main mission was planned to last 90 sols is now over 11 years on Mars , these things can and do exceed their warranty.
Sadly Spirit rover wasn't so lucky , hopefully Curiosity doesn't get stuck up Mt Sharp.
Huh?? Did I miss something?
NASA’s Mars Curiosity rover has found another hint that there may once have been life on Mars – biologically useful nitrogen in dust and rock samples.
research from Louisiana State University points to potential source of energy for life on Mars: carbon monoxide.
The paper suggests that carbon monoxide, which is found in "relatively high concentrations" in Mars' atmosphere, could be used as a "significant energy source" for microbes on or near the surface. "Of course, it must be noted that the persistence of extant microbial populations, if any exist, or populations transplanted in the future, depends on factors other than energy substrates," the paper notes. Nonetheless, it suggests that additional work could be put into determining just how conducive Mars may have been to microbial growth in this manner at an earlier point in its history.
www.theverge.com...
By drilling into Martian rocks, Curiosity found evidence of nitrates, compounds containing nitrogen that can be used by living organisms.
The Curiosity team has already found evidence that other ingredients needed for life, such as liquid water and organic matter, once existed at the site known as Gale Crater.
“Finding a biochemically accessible form of nitrogen is more support for the ancient Martian environment at Gale Crater being habitable,” Jennifer Stern of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland said in a statement.
www.iol.co.za...
We already found inorganic matter on stuff floating around in space....Let's try harder
Just because dust has Nitrogen we are concluding now that there was life there? Oh my garsh
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Chrisfishenstein
We already found inorganic matter on stuff floating around in space....Let's try harder
The found organic compounds on Mars , perhaps you should try harder to understand.
Just because dust has Nitrogen we are concluding now that there was life there? Oh my garsh
No , they are concluding that life COULD have existed on Mars , not hard to understand the difference really.
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Chrisfishenstein
Nobody is claiming proof of anything , it is however evidence that Mars had the conditions suitable for life in the past.
I believe based on what we know that Mars did start to evolve life but the evolution was cut short by the loss of it's magnetic shield and atmosphere , although Mars may still be home to life beneath it's surface but that's for future missions to explore.
originally posted by: Chrisfishenstein
a reply to: gortex
has gone on to give us the best indication yet that Mars was likely a home to life early in its history.
Huh?? Did I miss something? Oh, you mean the rocks we keep finding....
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
originally posted by: Chrisfishenstein
a reply to: gortex
has gone on to give us the best indication yet that Mars was likely a home to life early in its history.
Huh?? Did I miss something? Oh, you mean the rocks we keep finding....
As Gortex subsequently mentioned, there is evidence that life as we know it could have been viable on Mars in its early history, but (granted) that in itself is not evidence that life actually existed.
originally posted by: Chrisfishenstein
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
originally posted by: Chrisfishenstein
a reply to: gortex
has gone on to give us the best indication yet that Mars was likely a home to life early in its history.
Huh?? Did I miss something? Oh, you mean the rocks we keep finding....
As Gortex subsequently mentioned, there is evidence that life as we know it could have been viable on Mars in its early history, but (granted) that in itself is not evidence that life actually existed.
So nitrates have nothing to do with Mars having an atmosphere at some point? Nope, could be humans....Oh it pains me to keep going here....
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
originally posted by: Chrisfishenstein
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
originally posted by: Chrisfishenstein
a reply to: gortex
has gone on to give us the best indication yet that Mars was likely a home to life early in its history.
Huh?? Did I miss something? Oh, you mean the rocks we keep finding....
As Gortex subsequently mentioned, there is evidence that life as we know it could have been viable on Mars in its early history, but (granted) that in itself is not evidence that life actually existed.
So nitrates have nothing to do with Mars having an atmosphere at some point? Nope, could be humans....Oh it pains me to keep going here....
I don't understand what you mean by this response to my post.
All I'm saying is that evidence suggests that Mars may have once had the materials necessary to have been able to support life chemistry. I have no idea if life actually existed, but if it did, Mars seems to have had the ability to support that life.
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: Chrisfishenstein
You seem to be having a phantom argument with yourself instead of what the article (and subsequent posters) have been saying.
originally posted by: Chrisfishenstein
Simply a statement that nitrates PROVE only that there was an atmosphere at one point....Not life....