It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: victor7
If Putin didn't act like an overly aggressive 5 year old asshat throwing a tempter tantrum these nations would not be looking at NATO.
Putin is Russia's worst enemy.
Neutral, or strategically unimportant countries would not be targeted as they would not be considered a threat, unless that country was occupied by an enemy country or allied themselves to one.
originally posted by: LostAndFound2
originally posted by: Xcathdra
NATO is a defensive alliance only.
How can you write something like this and expect to be taken seriously
Where is your credibility.
Why should you be considered anything more than a rah rah USA chanter
originally posted by: MysterX
a reply to: DJW001
or strategically unimportant countries
Did you skim and cherry pick?...you did didn't you.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: MysterX
. Why did civil war erupt? Because Ukraine dared move from favoring Russia, to treating both Russia and the EU equally, ie; it moved towards neutrality.
To Putin, a neutral country is not a threat, it is vulnerable.
originally posted by: Laxus
a reply to: Xcathdra
Tell that Muammar Gaddafi
originally posted by: Laxus
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: MysterX
. Why did civil war erupt? Because Ukraine dared move from favoring Russia, to treating both Russia and the EU equally, ie; it moved towards neutrality.
To Putin, a neutral country is not a threat, it is vulnerable.
Civil war broke out after Ukraine turned down EU proposal, unless you were not following the cookies on Maidan. Ukraine turned neutral ? Then Nulland and McCain were really just giving free cookies.
Civil war broke out after Ukraine turned down EU proposal,
Glazyev, speaking on the sidelines of the discussion, said the exact opposite was true: "Ukrainian authorities make a huge mistake if they think that the Russian reaction will become neutral in a few years from now. This will not happen."
Instead, he said, signing the agreement would make the default of Ukraine inevitable and Moscow would not offer any helping hand. "Russia is the main creditor of Ukraine. Only with customs union with Russia can Ukraine balance its trade," he said. Russia has already slapped import restrictions on certain Ukrainian products and Glazyev did not rule out further sanctions if the agreement was signed.
The Kremlin aide added that the political and social cost of EU integration could also be high, and allowed for the possibility of separatist movements springing up in the Russian-speaking east and south of Ukraine. He suggested that if Ukraine signed the agreement, Russia would consider the bilateral treaty that delineates the countries' borders to be void.
"We don't want to use any kind of blackmail. This is a question for the Ukrainian people," said Glazyev. "But legally, signing this agreement about association with EU, the Ukrainian government violates the treaty on strategic partnership and friendship with Russia." When this happened, he said, Russia could no longer guarantee Ukraine's status as a state and could possibly intervene if pro-Russian regions of the country appealed directly to Moscow.
unless you were not following the cookies on Maidan. Ukraine turned neutral ? Then Nulland and McCain were really just giving free cookies.
How can you write something like this and expect to be taken seriously
originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: Xcathdra
Russia Threatens Sweden With Military 'Consequences' If It Joins NATO Alliance, Report Says
Is anyone surprised by these words?