It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The preeminent astronomer {Clyde Tombaugh} who reported seeing unidentified flying objects

page: 3
16
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 27 2015 @ 07:29 AM
link   
a reply to: QueenofWeird

if I ever thought the government was in control I would have expected the whole lid to be blown of years ago,i doubt very much that they have much say and far less input than they like to 'miragema'n into existence



Do I really want to know? Well if it's extraterrestials I'd rather be left in the dark I think. How creepy.


I think there lies the problem


funbox




posted on Jul, 29 2015 @ 05:30 AM
link   
a reply to: funbox

Well.... welcome ALIENS


Another thing I have mentioned earlier, in part 16 of 16 they see a TRIANGULAR ufo! In 1950 or shortly before.

Also they, the soldiers, refer to something as "pancake". I still don't know what that means, as far as I know it's no military term. And others are explained in the text, like joy meaning making contact.


edit on 29-7-2015 by QueenofWeird because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 29 2015 @ 09:56 AM
link   
a reply to: QueenofWeird

yes ,them triangular shaped ones have been around a while




In Nature, 90-169, Charles Tilden Smith writes that, at Chisbury, Wiltshire, England, April 8, 1912, he saw something in the sky --(16) [253/254]

" -- unlike anything that I had ever seen before."

"Although I have studied the skies for many years, I have never seen anything like it."

He saw two stationary dark patches upon clouds.

The extraordinary part:

They were stationary upon clouds that were rapidly moving.

They were fan-shaped -- or triangular -- and varied in size, but kept the same position upon different clouds as cloud after cloud came along. For more than half an hour Mr. Smith watched these dark patches --

His impression as to the one that appeared first:

That it was "really a heavy shadow, cast upon a thin veil of clouds by some unseen object away in the west, which was intercepting the sun's rays."

www.resologist.net...
pancake sounds like an observational comparative, to what I don't know , but I get the feeling there''s some amusement to the "nickname"

funbox
edit on 29-7-2015 by funbox because: wolfcrow



posted on Aug, 2 2015 @ 01:58 PM
link   
a reply to: funbox

Holy pancake
1912! What is it that Shaggy says? Geezers creepers (and then Scooby says mmwmwmwm)


EDIT: by the way, when I was 22 I was in a very dark field with then boyfriend (we were walking to the nearest town as his parents lived in a village), when I saw above the clouds lights than shone through those clouds. Looked like searching lights, BUT NO SOUNDS what so ever....


edit on 2-8-2015 by QueenofWeird because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 2 2015 @ 02:10 PM
link   
a reply to: Erno86

Well I saw this close up in 2013:



At first I thought it must be some cutting edge military
aircraft or drone.

Then it started changing shape and doing other
'impossible things'.

Now it COULD have been just that.. with some
sort of plasma or em field that affected my
temporal lobes.. certainly could have been
that..

but there are other explanations too.

It's the only 'UFO' that I've ever seen in
54 years.

Kev



posted on Aug, 2 2015 @ 02:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear
a reply to: Erno86

Well I saw this close up in 2013:



At first I thought it must be some cutting edge military
aircraft or drone.

Then it started changing shape and doing other
'impossible things'.

Now it COULD have been just that.. with some
sort of plasma or em field that affected my
temporal lobes.. certainly could have been
that..

but there are other explanations too.

It's the only 'UFO' that I've ever seen in
54 years.

Kev


How close to that infernal thing were you?!



posted on Aug, 2 2015 @ 02:18 PM
link   
a reply to: QueenofWeird

I can't truly say. I had no distance referent actually.
For example it wasn't at tree level or anything like
that.

But it's apparent size and apparent distance was
sufficient for me to see small structural details..
so that seemed plenty close to me.

Why do you use the word 'infernal' ?

Kev



posted on Aug, 2 2015 @ 02:23 PM
link   
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Infernal as in very very creepy!



posted on Aug, 2 2015 @ 02:26 PM
link   
a reply to: QueenofWeird

are you sure that wasn't the byproduct of an orgasm ? the sudden rush of blood can sometimes create flashes etc, were these flashes fleeting or around for a while ?


funbox


edit on 2-8-2015 by funbox because: prone an intence howling at the moon



posted on Aug, 2 2015 @ 02:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: QueenofWeird
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Infernal as in very very creepy!



The thing my eye really latched on was the crackly
granite like thickness of it.. didn't look machined..
looked like it had been cut out of a mountain or
something.. but then it changed shape and all
worry about what it looked like or didn't look
like went out the window...there was no fear
associated with this sighting.. just a little
adrenaline.

Kev



posted on Aug, 2 2015 @ 02:31 PM
link   
a reply to: funbox

No you wanker (respectfully said
). We had no car and it was summer. Honestly you seem to think that I am some loon on pot or doing whoopie in a dark field and mistaking hot flushes for potential UFO's...






posted on Aug, 2 2015 @ 02:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear

originally posted by: QueenofWeird
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Infernal as in very very creepy!



The thing my eye really latched on was the crackly
granite like thickness of it.. didn't look machined..
looked like it had been cut out of a mountain or
something.. but then it changed shape and all
worry about what it looked like or didn't look
like went out the window...there was no fear
associated with this sighting.. just a little
adrenaline.

Kev


In principle this thing could have been gigantic? Because you could see the details. Anyways, how come you saw anything at all? How dark was the it outside?



posted on Aug, 2 2015 @ 02:39 PM
link   
a reply to: QueenofWeird

summer, pot, romantic walks in the countryside are all factors that you supplied , *you whore * (respectfully zeg) I think there classic circumstances for a sighting , ahh .. O .. I see, say no more

then i9 have no clue

scoobysnackBox



posted on Aug, 2 2015 @ 02:46 PM
link   
a reply to: QueenofWeird

Dusk. The Earth had just rotated sunlight beneath
the horizon about 10 minutes before.

It was perfect to view a black craft with 1 bright
central light and 3 dim red lights in the corners.

Ridiculously optimal viewing time.

Kev



posted on Aug, 2 2015 @ 02:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear
a reply to: QueenofWeird

Dusk. The Earth had just rotated sunlight beneath
the horizon about 10 minutes before.

It was perfect to view a black craft with 1 bright
central light and 3 dim red lights in the corners.

Ridiculously optimal viewing time.

Kev


Yeah I know, these things are not shy. If alien the lights are to signal each other I would guess. Which means they can see or somehow pick up visible EM. Unless it´s to form those standing lights I think they´re called. I wonder in what circumstances a triangle shape is handy. Combat?



posted on Aug, 2 2015 @ 03:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: QueenofWeird

originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear
a reply to: QueenofWeird

Dusk. The Earth had just rotated sunlight beneath
the horizon about 10 minutes before.

It was perfect to view a black craft with 1 bright
central light and 3 dim red lights in the corners.

Ridiculously optimal viewing time.

Kev


Yeah I know, these things are not shy. If alien the lights are to signal each other I would guess. Which means they can see or somehow pick up visible EM. Unless it´s to form those standing lights I think they´re called. I wonder in what circumstances a triangle shape is handy. Combat?



Well I myself do not believe that there are any
nuts and bolts UFOs in our skys, or ever have
been, nor any break away civilizations building
starship enterprises either.

I think that other explanations make infinitely
more sense.

I will say that the image quality of the deception
of being a physical craft is first rate. Of course
it would have to be, or nobody would be deceived.

In fact it's 'too good' is my point.

Kev
edit on 2-8-2015 by KellyPrettyBear because: Typo



posted on Aug, 2 2015 @ 03:22 PM
link   
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Are you talking about holograms? But why? Or do you mean inter-dimensional things or time travel related?



posted on Aug, 2 2015 @ 03:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: QueenofWeird
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Are you talking about holograms? But why? Or do you mean inter-dimensional things or time travel related?



It's sentient plasma related is my theory.

If you read my various posts, you'd catch a little
of what i'm talking about.. I have a post up right
now that touches on it some.

Kev



posted on Aug, 2 2015 @ 03:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: KellyPrettyBear

originally posted by: QueenofWeird
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Are you talking about holograms? But why? Or do you mean inter-dimensional things or time travel related?



It's sentient plasma related is my theory.

If you read my various posts, you'd catch a little
of what i'm talking about.. I have a post up right
now that touches on it some.

Kev


Ok, I will. The electric universe.



posted on Aug, 2 2015 @ 03:56 PM
link   
a reply to: QueenofWeird

I'm not actually an electric universe fan per se..
the science isn't there.. I'm also not a 'dark plasma'
adherent either ... about half of the 'dark plasma'
theory is just recycled Theosophy in my opinion.

Frankly, I've not fully communicated the theory yet..
but i do post some about it. It's got some very
unpleasant parts to it, so I keep those to myself.

Kev



new topics




 
16
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join