It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: chr0naut
you want this so badly to be a grave injustice, but the fact is, the people of the UK CHOSE this. good luck swinging their vote, im sure they have already had plenty of time to consider. then again, maybe all they did was turn on CNN.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: chr0naut
you want this so badly to be a grave injustice, but the fact is, the people of the UK CHOSE this. good luck swinging their vote, im sure they have already had plenty of time to consider. then again, maybe all they did was turn on CNN.
In 1933 the German people elected Hitler & the National Socialists. So much for the mandate of the masses.
Also, it's too late to swing any votes.
As you think my responses have something to do with religion, despite numerous attempts to clarify the issue. I don't think I'll respond any further.
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: stumason
Human rights are precious.
We have honed them over such a long time.
Shame to throw them away.
originally posted by: chr0naut
In 1933 the German people elected Hitler & the National Socialists. So much for the mandate of the masses.
Also, it's too late to swing any votes.
As you think my responses have something to do with religion, despite numerous attempts to clarify the issue. I don't think I'll respond any further.
originally posted by: chr0naut
Not suggesting talking about religions. I am suggesting talking about ideas as to how the universe came about. Most theistic descriptions are very brief and you do not have to explain the religious 'fine detail', just the conceptual outline.
A secular teacher, mentions Creation in a science lesson (perhaps in response to a religious student's question) and this is reported to "higher-ups" (Department for Education staff).
The higher-ups choose to prosecute fully under the terms of this legislation and cut (not reduce) the science budget to this school.
The school has 18 teachers and 336 students (UK National averages from 2012 statistics), all are affected by the budget cut.
Human rights are precious.
We have honed them over such a long time.
Shame to throw them away.
originally posted by: chr0naut
Look, consider this scenario:
A secular teacher, mentions Creation in a science lesson (perhaps in response to a religious student's question) and this is reported to "higher-ups" (Department for Education staff).
“The parties recognise that the teaching of creationism is not part of prevailing practice in the English education system, but acknowledge that it is however important that all schools are clear about what is expected in terms of the curriculum which they need to provide. The parties further recognise that the requirement on every academy and free school to provide a broad and balanced curriculum, in any case prevents the teaching of creationism as evidence based theory in any academy or free school.
The secretary of state acknowledges that clauses 2.43 and 2.44 of the Funding Agreement, and clauses 23E and 23G above do not prevent discussion of beliefs about the origins of the Earth and living things, such as creationism, in Religious Education, as long as it is not presented as a valid alternative to established scientific theory.”
The higher-ups choose to prosecute fully under the terms of this legislation and cut (not reduce) the science budget to this school.
The school has 18 teachers and 336 students (UK National averages from 2012 statistics), all are affected by the budget cut.
Educational standards in the school are reduced as teaching resources can no longer be afforded. The grading of the students is therefore negatively affected and the overall rating of the school is reduced in Department for Education listings.
The secretary of state acknowledges that clauses 2.43 and 2.44 of the Funding Agreement, and clauses 23E and 23G above do not prevent discussion of beliefs about the origins of the Earth and living things, such as creationism, in Religious Education, as long as it is not presented as a valid alternative to established scientific theory
The effect of this legislation is a mechanism for the Education Department to manipulate its statistics and funding of schools. It has nothing to do with religious indoctrination. If it did, the legislation would apply only to the person who infracted it. The 'punishment' is far broader than the 'crime'.
If you are a UK parent, with a child going to a public school, this legislation can negatively affect your child's education arbitrarily (your child need not be in any way associated with the teacher or the particular science class).
Do you get it?
As BHA Faith Schools Campaigner Richy Thompson noted, the reason behind this change was that “every young person is entitled to a high quality, broad and balanced education. This includes in biology, where evolution is a central topic and is vital to understanding how human life came to be. On the other hand, ideas such as young earth creationism should not be taught as scientifically valid for the very simple reason that they are not.”
originally posted by: nonspecific
a reply to: chr0naut
I will ignore your opening and hit you with this.
No one cares about your opinion as regards to this.
I am happy to be wrong on this but will take a hit if needed.
Pleae find me a Uk member or resident that agree's with you opinion.
Just one thats all.
originally posted by: chr0naut
Please, if you are a UK resident,who has browsed this thread but have not participated yet and can see why I may be concerned, quote this post using the link above.
Thank you.
originally posted by: grainofsand
originally posted by: chr0naut
Please, if you are a UK resident,who has browsed this thread but have not participated yet and can see why I may be concerned, quote this post using the link above.
Thank you.
Ooh I'm interested to see the UK replies, be funny as if the majority agree with the member from New Zealand, lol.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: nonspecific
a reply to: chr0naut
I will ignore your opening and hit you with this.
No one cares about your opinion as regards to this.
I am happy to be wrong on this but will take a hit if needed.
Pleae find me a Uk member or resident that agree's with you opinion.
Just one thats all.
You may have a valid point.
Please, if you are a UK resident,who has browsed this thread but have not participated yet and can see why I may be concerned, quote this post using the link above.
Do not do so if you are not from the UK.
Thank you.
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: chr0naut
As a UK resident, I assure you that no one in the UK gives a flying f*ck.
Your argument has switched and changed so much I don't think even you know what it is you're trying to argue for.
It's not rocket science:
1) Science classes will cater to science
2) RE classes will cater to the various religious beliefs and myths
No one's being "oppressed", no one's human rights are being "infringed", no one's free speech is being "silenced", it's just business as usual in the UK.
This may be a hard pill to swallow for a creationist such as yourself (and yes, you may deny it but we all know your agenda here), this latest ruling is nothing more than a formality. Hardly anyone in this country subscribes to such ludicrous beliefs such as Creationism.
For any Brit here, I assure you the response to this ruling is "oh, I didn't even know that was even a thing. I wonder what;s on the telly tonight?".