It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Barcs
a reply to: chr0naut
The school employees broke the law, you can't blame anybody but them for the funding getting pulled. Now they face the consequences. What you are doing is like saying that a law against stealing is responsible for those who break it. Oh man, that anti thievery law totally has an agenda against thieves! Well, of course it does, because stealing is detrimental to society. In the same light teaching a world view as an alternative to science is counter intuitive and goes against what science actually is. There should be a stronger agenda against this type of behavior, if you ask me. Do you think the human rights of thieves are being violated because there are laws against stealing?
originally posted by: stumason
Is this argument still going on with the crazy, bible thumping Yank?
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: chr0naut
Please stop pretending you know anything about the uk school system outside of your frantic googling to try and fit reality to your ridiculous viewpoint.
originally posted by: chr0naut
Right now, I am employed by a number of schools and I have a background in politics and academia. I assure you that I am not ignorant of the issues facing educators and government.
originally posted by: SuperFrog
originally posted by: chr0naut
Right now, I am employed by a number of schools and I have a background in politics and academia. I assure you that I am not ignorant of the issues facing educators and government.
Now you got me worried... mix between someone with your views and education can't be anyway good for children.
What those education institution teach? Ignorance and anti-education??
originally posted by: Barcs
a reply to: chr0naut
But it sounds like those funding issues have zero to do with this law or creationism being pulled from the science curriculum.
originally posted by: Phantom423
Here’s the bottomline folks: If Creationism is taught in public schools, how would students ever learn chemistry, physics and biology? Creationism is the antithesis of science as we know it – the science that we use every day in every way – from your light bulb to the MRI you require to diagnose a disease process.
So what does a school do? Shut down their science labs? In a hypothetical school, first period may be chemistry. And today’s lesson plan is to teach and demonstrate radioactive decay and isotopes. Second period is Creationism, which contradicts everything students learned in first period!!! How does that work? It’s illogical.
I know some of you don’t get it. But that’s why we have sensible governments and educational administrations who understand that the real world of science and technology i.e. the one you’re posting on here at ATS, is the one that students should be learning. And not dinosaurs walking with humans, the universe created in 6 days.
I still find it amazing that this thread exists. One would think that logic would prevail…..
Enough said about that….
originally posted by: chr0naut
Those schools teach the standard, secular, national educational curriculum.
originally posted by: chr0naut
I do not agree with the teaching of only the literalist view of Biblical Creation as a science subject. I believe that your assumption that I do is based upon the fact that you are filtering what you read in my posts through personal prejudice.
originally posted by: chr0naut
The Bible is NOT a science textbook. It is a book of ethics, history and religion.
originally posted by: chr0nautIt uses metaphor and allegory to reveal its lessons. Nor are its concepts entirely devoid of scientific support (the Big Bang theory being supportive of the concept of a beginning to the universe and Holographic virtual universe models, with the error correction that has been observed, suggest an intelligent God simulating it). The oft repeated opinion that there is no scientific support is simply untrue and ignorant.
originally posted by: chr0naut
I do disagree with legislation that mandates against and prosecutes the expression of an opinion.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Barcs
a reply to: chr0naut
But it sounds like those funding issues have zero to do with this law or creationism being pulled from the science curriculum.
- The legislation controls funding (it is part of the DfE Funding Agreement).
The legislation does not teach validated science, or enforce the teaching of validated science subjects.
The legislation prosecutes the expression of an opinion (even in a Religious Education class where one may reasonably expect that opinion to be discussed).
The legislation does not apply specifically to a Science class but to all classes in all subjects.
The legislation closes schools.
(the Big Bang theory being supportive of the concept of a beginning to the universe and Holographic virtual universe models, with the error correction that has been observed, suggest an intelligent God simulating it). The oft repeated opinion that there is no scientific support is simply untrue and ignorant.
originally posted by: SuperFrog
originally posted by: chr0naut
Those schools teach the standard, secular, national educational curriculum.
I try to imagine if I would have to work in school where they teach creationism... must be bit hard for you, isn't it??
originally posted by: chr0naut
I do not agree with the teaching of only the literalist view of Biblical Creation as a science subject. I believe that your assumption that I do is based upon the fact that you are filtering what you read in my posts through personal prejudice.
What else can I base my assumption on - except your posts - and you were very clear what is your opinion... no prejudice required, we are entitled to have an opinion...
originally posted by: chr0naut
The Bible is NOT a science textbook. It is a book of ethics, history and religion.
Ethical?? How?? By suggesting to love God more then your kids?? How historical when today for example we know that great flood has never happen. Bible is collection of folklore tales, some of them might be correct, many of them are not much different then rest of fairy tales... compared to ancient people - there is some ethics... but it is outdated by today standard, from equality of sexes to reproductive rights...
originally posted by: chr0nautIt uses metaphor and allegory to reveal its lessons. Nor are its concepts entirely devoid of scientific support (the Big Bang theory being supportive of the concept of a beginning to the universe and Holographic virtual universe models, with the error correction that has been observed, suggest an intelligent God simulating it). The oft repeated opinion that there is no scientific support is simply untrue and ignorant.
Voodoo science again??
originally posted by: chr0naut
I do disagree with legislation that mandates against and prosecutes the expression of an opinion.
So if my opinion is that 1 + 1 is 3, I should be able to teach children what is my opinion... even all points that math is quite simple and has correct answer... please, explain that to me... how is misleading kids an opinion???
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: chr0naut
lol! You mean the centuries before evolution was discovered? The ones where state schooling didn't even exist?
I would have thought that given how low your illogical arguments have sunk, surely it must be upwards from here. Apparently not.
But please, keep lecturing us Brits on the merits and cons of our educational system and school curriculum. I do enjoy it when non-nationals with not even half a clue stick their oar into something they have no knowledge or experience of.
originally posted by: Phantom423
a reply to: chr0naut
Which schools exactly?? Is it taught in New York, Los Angeles, Salt Lake City public school??
originally posted by: nonspecific
a reply to: chr0naut
Are you still at this!
Creedence for sticking with it sir.