It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We were becoming an industrial power then though, and more people were paying taxes as there was a lot of people working on decent jobs created by the boom. We wasted the extra money going to the moon.
build a real space cruiser with real 6 inch thick metal walls lined with something like lead, tungsten, berylium, lithium, cesium and high hydrogen content polymers plus water tanks.
there is no paradox. if something is worth doing it is worth doing in excellence. we have the technical means to build robustly in space. we have heavy lift to take the prefabricated pieces into position to be put together. any one of those materials can be used as radiation shielding and steel or titanium or aluminium can be used for a robust protective hull particularly if Wiffel shielding is added or angled ingots are used in composite layers with softer materials. the M2P2 plasma sheath system can be far more powerful than earths own magnetosphere in terms of shielding from solar and come cosmic rays.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: stormbringer1701
build a real space cruiser with real 6 inch thick metal walls lined with something like lead, tungsten, berylium, lithium, cesium and high hydrogen content polymers plus water tanks.
You don't see the paradox in that statement? In any case, you don't understand the problem.
the problem is plastic and ceramic materials are good for some types or radiation and not so good for others. likewise metal shielding is good for some but not so good for others. but it does have the virtue of also providing impact hazard mitigation. there is room for both. in fact for at least three of them. metal hull with plastic ceramic liner and water tankage strategically placed. inner bulkheads and decking would also be plastic or ceramic with metal framing.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: stormbringer1701
So you agree with me that the solution will be found in plastic/ceramic materials.
Ok.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: stormbringer1701
So. Word salad.
Ok.
The fact is, right now, there is no solution for long term exposure to cosmic radiation.
yeah there is. the daily exposure rate is low unless there is a cosmic weather event. so the solution if you are not satisfied with shielding materials is is to go extra fast to reduce the number of days one is exposed in transit. On or around Mars there are other options available depending on the nature of the mission.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: stormbringer1701
So. Word salad.
Ok.
The fact is, right now, there is no solution for long term exposure to cosmic radiation.
That's what I said in my initial post.
the daily exposure rate is low unless there is a cosmic weather event.
How fast is "extra fast?" What is the transit time? What is the source of thrust?
o the solution if you are not satisfied with shielding materials is is to go extra fast to reduce the number of days one is exposed in transit.
For example?
On or around Mars there are other options available depending on the nature of the mission.
since cosmic events are directional it is probably possible to put a large object between an orbiting facility and the direction of a sever cosmic flux event.