It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 77
Originally posted by marg6043
"Seekerof, That is more incriminating.
1.Why? Because the Bush administration changed the law regarding the treatment of detainees when his administration redesign the Geneva convention and stripped them of protection.
2. Marg, the Geneva Convention Accords only deal with soldiers i.e. clearly visible uniforms with insignias, not TERRORIST, there is a difference.
3. Torture as it is applied today is not what one thinks of from medieval literature. Today they live through the experience to spread the warning to others of their kind. Kindness and mercy to these fanatics will only make them bolder. They have got to be fearful of an opponent. This done by use of nearly any means available.
4. How much force would you suggest we use on people that target women and children with hidden explosives?
[edit on 24-12-2004 by 77]
Originally posted by CazMedia
Im sorry for your asssault, it surley was innapropriate, but what does this have to do with interrogation of captured enemy combatants?
Originally posted by CazMedia
a person that has been tortured can go on to recover, even if they have lost limbs or have scars, and can continue in life to perhaps win the nobel peace prize, discover the cure for cancer, or just live out his days
a dead person doenst continue to anything.
Originally posted by CazMedia
How one can get these 2 levels of "harm" mixed up is beyond belief, and says alot about the mentality that thinks interrorgation using the methods the USA has condoned is somehow beyond reproach.
Originally posted by J0HNSmith
Originally posted by 77
Originally posted by marg6043
"Seekerof, That is more incriminating.
1.Why? Because the Bush administration changed the law regarding the treatment of detainees when his administration redesign the Geneva convention and stripped them of protection.
2. Marg, the Geneva Convention Accords only deal with soldiers i.e. clearly visible uniforms with insignias, not TERRORIST, there is a difference.
3. Torture as it is applied today is not what one thinks of from medieval literature. Today they live through the experience to spread the warning to others of their kind. Kindness and mercy to these fanatics will only make them bolder. They have got to be fearful of an opponent. This done by use of nearly any means available.
4. How much force would you suggest we use on people that target women and children with hidden explosives?
[edit on 24-12-2004 by 77]
1. The Bush administration can not redesign the Geneva convention, They signed it "as is" and any attempt to change has to be ratified by congress and the international community. They tried to change the definition of torture to fit their desire to hurt people they think might be the enemy.
1A) The Geneva Convention was not redesigned and while the nomenclature is void of "Uniform" the visible insignia and visible weapon is there. These are supposedly terrorist that are in special confinement other than general population at camp x ray. That is to say they are known terrorist.
2. Read it again, it does not only deal with people in uniforms.
2A. See above
3. Have you seen the pictures? Some of that stuff makes midevil torture look fun. You're sick if you can justify doing that stuff to someone else.
3A Please provide the link. I have only read the standard: loud noise, AC on AC off, strobe light, cigarette prodding. No reports of bone marrow scraping using acupuncture needles- that are effective and leave no evidence. I have held the remains of a child that was tortured to death (I do not tolerate that-ever), So please share the photo link.
4. How much force would you suggest we use against people who murder innocent women and children with big bombs they drop out of the sky? What's the dif?
4A. the difference, dear pie lover, the "big bombs" are used in carpet bombing of military forces. When surgical strikes are used with small missiles our military are not aiming specifically for women and children. It is a huge difference between unavoidable casualties of war and specific murder of women and children to bring about photo opts.
I will allow no harm to an innocent within ten feet of my person, at times I�ve opened that up to several miles.
Again Mr. Smith please provide the links to those photos, as my position may change on this specific thread. Thank you.
Originally posted by DrHoracid
I hate only "evil" on this planet.
Evil is a personal decision.
I also believe we are at war with evil. Islam itself is evil becuase it deny's Christ.
Originally posted by DrHoracid
The roots of evil are not "poverty or lack of education". Neither is it wealth. Evil is a personal decision.
I also believe we are at war with evil. Islam itself is evil becuase it deny's Christ.
Originally posted by Kidfinger
It seems this thread has degenterated into the conservatives spouting crap agian. You make it sound like we want to give each terrorist or Iraqi insurgent a million dollars and 50 acres of land. You guys are rediculas. Of course we want justice. But we are not willing to sacrifice God given rights just to have justice. In the end, it is not you conservatives who will judge. Dont forget that.
Edit: theLibra, This is not directed towards you. You replied befor I could.
[edit on 12/22/04 by Kidfinger]
Originally posted by krotzkrotz
Ouch. islam does not deny christ, it even accepts him as a prophet. It just denies the evangels, which most archaeologists do, since they simply contain what is known as mithraism, adapted to judaism.
Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
led by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld -- have contended that the crimes were carried out by a few low-ranking reservists, that they were limited to the night shift during a few chaotic months at Abu Ghraib in 2003, that they were unrelated to the interrogation of prisoners and that no torture occurred at the Guantanamo Bay prison where hundreds of terrorism suspects are held. The new documents establish beyond any doubt that every part of this cover story is false.
UN 'ignored' abuse at Kosovo mental homes
Oliver Burkeman in New York
Thursday August 8, 2002
The Guardian
Patients at United Nations mental institutions in Kosovo have been raped and physically attacked under the eyes of UN staff, held in "filthy and degrading" conditions, and threatened with punishment if they report the abuses, according to a damning investigation published in New York yesterday.
In one case, a woman patient was raped after UN employees locked her in a room with a male patient because they wanted to "calm her down", while employees who observed another rape in a hallway said they did not intervene because the victim "must have asked for it", according to the independent campaigning group Mental Disability Rights International (MDRI), which produced the report.
U.N. Sexual Abuse Alleged in Congo
Peacekeepers Accused in Draft Report
By Colum Lynch
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, December 16, 2004; Page A26
UNITED NATIONS, Dec. 15 -- U.N. peacekeepers threatened U.N. investigators investigating allegations of sexual misconduct in Congo and sought to bribe witnesses to change incriminating testimony, a confidential U.N. draft report says.
The 34-page report, which was obtained by The Washington Post, accuses U.N. peacekeepers from Morocco, Pakistan and Nepal of seeking to obstruct U.N. efforts to investigate a sexual abuse scandal that has damaged the United Nations' standing in Congo.
Other documents detail abuses by Marines in Iraq, including mock executions and the torture of detainees by burning and electric shock. Several dozen detainees have died in U.S. custody.
But the documents also confirm that interrogators at Guantanamo believed they were following orders from Mr. Rumsfeld. One FBI agent reported on May 10 about a conversation he had with Guantanamo's commander, Maj. Gen. Geoffrey D. Miller, who defended the use of interrogation techniques the FBI regarded as illegal on the grounds that the military "has their marching orders from the Sec Def."
The record of the past few months suggests that the administration will neither hold any senior official accountable nor change the policies that have produced this shameful record. Congress, too, has abdicated its responsibility under its Republican leadership: It has been nearly four months since the last hearing on prisoner abuse. Perhaps intervention by the courts will eventually stem the violations of human rights that appear to be ongoing in Guantanamo, Iraq and Afghanistan. For now the appalling truth is that there has been no remedy for the documented torture and killing of foreign prisoners by this American government.
Originally posted by Muaddib
What many of the liberals, democrats and others who will use any excuse to try to bash away at Bush and the present administration don't want to concede and don't realize is that, first of all i am not even sure about the authenticity of that memo, there have been quite a few things going around on the internet who have become clear as events and more information was release that they were fake....
Now, i am not saying that the above is a reason to allow any brutal form of torture to be used. What i am saying is that people are people no matter who they work for, or "what they are supposed to do", some people are criminals/beasts and will do many criminal acts "on their own."
[edit on 25-12-2004 by Muaddib]
Originally posted by Muaddib
They do not see Jesus as God, they only see him as a prophet that I know of.
There is a big difference between Islam and other religions, and if you read what Mohammed did and his explanations of why he did it, you will see why we are in the mess we have right now, "terrorism", and ever since the 7th century AD.
BTW, what do you think would have happened if Jesus Christ was going around attacking caravans, beheading people, even after surrendering and taking the wives from captives, including 6-9 years old girls?.....
What do you think many Christians would be doing if Jesus went around with a sword conquering people, towns, cities, etc and making you decide to either convert to Christianity or face heavy taxation which would be impossible for you to pay, and would leave you without bread for you and your family for days on end?....
To anwser my own question, many Christians would be doing what Islamic extremists are doing now, that is part of the reason why they want Islam to dominate the world, ever since the 7th century.
"The FBI agent was mistaken regarding the existence of an executive order on interrogation techniques. No such executive order exists or has ever existed. The Defense Department determines the methods of interrogation of military detainees in the Iraq conflict."
Originally posted by Seekerof
Funny people:
"Authorized" seriously needs to be changed to the Political Correct "suggests" or "alledges".
Innocent in a court of law till proven guilty, and despite the feeble 'circumstantial evidences' given, it still amounts to an "allegation" that "suggests".
Originally posted by Seekerof
Also, could someone find said still missing E.O. or "memo" that further indicates that the administration or the President would authorize...