Tony Blair - so objectionable the Elite reject him?

In the Daily Mail today there was this article Tony Blair say's he won't retire in which he lays out his plans to go on and create a "cadre" of former leaders to "guide" the world forward.

But that already exists, we have the Bilderberg Group for oen, comprised of former leaders, money men, powerbrokers, king makers, etc. Did his invitiation get lost on the post? Is he such an abject failure in their eyes they don't want him involved with them in case it brings them into disrepute? What about Bohemian Grove, does he not get invited to that select shadowy gathering? What about the other shadowy conspiratorial groups under whose guidance we're pemitted to exist, have they all rejected him so badly he's forced to create his own group of former leaderss?

Who would join such a toxic group? Former dictators pehaps? His one staunch ally was ahot dead in Libya, they hanged Saddam, the guy in Afghanistan is still hanging in there, the Saudis step into dead mens shoes so they aren't botehred, who is he going to get? Berlusconi? Obscure leaders most of us have never heard from? George W Bush who sincve leaving office is noticeable by his sheer abscence from the World Stage.

Who would flocl to Blair's banner? Not even Lord Mandelson I suspect.

What perceived oe actual crimes in the eyes of the shadowy conspiracies behind world policitcs has Blair committed that mean they want nothing to do with him and his messianic vision?

a reply to: Rob37n

In the Daily Mail

I stopped reading right there.

A utterly disgusting Rag.

a reply to: alldaylong

Fine, you don''t like the source, but that's not my point. I would have thought that a man who carried out the orders of these shadowy groups would be rewarded for his efforts once he stepped down, but it seems he is so objectionable even to them that they want nothing to do with him that he's forced to create his own group, and given that is what he's planning to do what bunch of fruitcakes, dictators, and the dangerous is he going to get onboard, and then scarily who might pay them the slightest bit of attention.

a reply to: Rob37n

Daily Mail in anti-labour shock.

Are you really that gullible. Conservative backing Daily Mail decides to do a character assassination on a Labour Politician only days after he made a speech in The General Election Campaign. I wonder why ?

Latest News. Daily Mail reveals Ed Milliband had several girlfriends before he meet his wife. So what ?

a reply to: alldaylong

What has Tony Blair and Labour to do with one another these days? He wasn't exactly a socialist was he. As for the anodyne anonymous Milliband I just wished I lived in Doncaster so I could vote against him. That's purely a personal point and NOTHING to do with my post. Can you please leave the partisan element of UK electoral politics out of this, or the merit or demerit of the Daily Mail and a proto-fascist rag. The issue is the abandonment of Blair by the Elite, stick to that.

The issue here is Tony Blair and his reward for being initially the appointee of the Bulderberg and other groups, then following out their commands, but subsequently being utterly rejected by all of those groups, why?

regardless of the politics

~tony b liar is a disgusting odious individual self absorbed power mad war criminal
i would not trust to run an ice cream cart!

he should be in a cell not still trying to claw back some influence and power and imo anyone who thinks
otherwise is either insane stupid or seriously deluded.

even the "power elites" dont want him anywhere near real power he served his purpose and now
he is forever toxic.

a reply to: Rob37n

The issue is the abandonment of Blair by the Elite

The same Tony Blair that was given a standing ovation by THE WHOLE House Of Commons when he left Parliament. Yes the elite where there on that day. Hypocrisy has many strange forms.

I have to admit, I almost stopped reading after "In the Daily Mail", but I still read through to the end, as the title intrigued me.

I have no idea of the validity of this but it does seem plausible, as, for someone still so vocal, and so well known, he appears to have so little influence nowadays, that, if he had held "proper" employment, he would have been given a golden handshake some time ago. I cannot imagine any established "New World order" group needing him. I suspect he'd even get black-balled by the Freemasons.

If I've read this right, his arrogance is staggering.

What right do persons who have been kicked out of office, or failed to attract enough votes to retain office, have to advise anyone?

If they knew what they were talking about, presumably they'd still be IN office. Why is anyone expected to listen to politicians who had their chance and blew it? Worse, he at least is a war criminal. If he and his cronies get together to create this little cabal I imagine they'll guide us straight into (yet another) war. What else is he qualified to advise anyone about?

Except maybe reducing all our liberties and freedoms and making the whole bloody country miserable before going on to spread misery in the Middle East.