It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
In fact evolution itself is seen as nothing more than the study of what happened after a creation process brought about life. Atheists admit they don't know exactly how and cannot reproduce life, but have faith that it just happened without a creator.
originally posted by: ServantOfTheLamb
a reply to: Noinden
Except Evolution and the origin of life are not separate. Its like saying we know how a car runs but we know nothing about internal combustion engines...
How is it that a few of you can keep repeating the same incorrect statement when several posters who are actually knowledgeable about the subject have told you that you're wrong?
Atheists say that there is no proof of god. There is also no proof of bigfoot, aliens, unicorns, fairies, leprechauns, or the loch ness monster but some people believe in those things.
Currently, the evidence isn't clear exactly how it happened but it happened. Just because we don't know how it happened, doesn't mean that the gap gets filled in with a god
3) You're using the classic "god of the gaps" argument which is very dangerous from a Christian standpoint
It it good that you posted this thread Blue_Jay33, but you must have known that it was an exercise in futility
there is the 50/50 people they haven't made up their minds yet, they are still searching and learning. I always find it fascinating how they get attacked just as viscously, as me.
Now less with the made up meaningless statistics. Evidence why we need to understand Abiogenisis/proteogenisis before evolution please.
originally posted by: Answer
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
In fact evolution itself is seen as nothing more than the study of what happened after a creation process brought about life. Atheists admit they don't know exactly how and cannot reproduce life, but have faith that it just happened without a creator.
*sigh*
Let's try this one last time. If you still can't get it, I'm just going to leave you to wallow in your arrogant ignorance.
You're stuck on this concept of "atheists say there's no god but they can't prove how life began so they're having faith that it was something other than god."
I've said it already in this thread, you pretend to be an authority on atheists but you don't have a clue.
1) Atheists say that there is no proof of god. There is also no proof of bigfoot, aliens, unicorns, fairies, leprechauns, or the loch ness monster but some people believe in those things. The biggest difference is that there isn't a "First Church of Sasquatch" that's threatening people with eternal damnation if they don't believe. Ironically, there's more evidence for bigfoot than there is for god.
2) It isn't a matter of faith. There is life on this planet. Life clearly had an origin. Currently, the evidence isn't clear exactly how it happened but it happened. Just because we don't know how it happened, doesn't mean that the gap gets filled in with a god. Intelligent people don't go around answering every difficult question with "god did it." Everything we know about math and science was discovered because "god did it" was not a suitable answer. Some people try to answer unexplained questions with "aliens did it" which is equally lazy. You seem to think that human beings have been studying this topic long enough to come up with an answer and that's laughable. We've made huge leaps in scientific understanding but we're still multiple generations away from a decent understanding of our own planet, much less the entire universe.
3) You're using the classic "god of the gaps" argument which is very dangerous from a Christian standpoint. Eventually, you'll run out of gaps and what will you have left on which to base your faith? Believe whatever you want to believe but don't try to argue against science and don't try to tell others what they believe. It just makes people dislike you and your whole religious ilk because it shows a level of irrationality and straw-grasping that reeks of ignorance and desperation.
no actual evidence from creationists. Also as usual, attacks on science
a reply to: WakeUpBeer
What part of evolutionary theory says life is meaningless and hollow?