It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Ironhawke
a reply to: MALBOSIA
That is the single stupidest thing I have ever heard. Someone has to be in the red for another to be in the black? Only in 'Murica, apparently. Guess no one told this to Sweden, the Netherlands, Switzerland, etc...
originally posted by: nwtrucker
I have never heard such a complete misrepresentation of how a society operates and survives in all my life.
It operates on exchange. Exchange of products, exchange of service. People are NOT profit/loss gain/lose.
If one produces a valuable product or service, exchanges it for other products or services. the via is usually a fiat money.
If one produces a highly valuable-subjective, to say the least- product or service, one receives more in exchange for it.
Yes, circumstance can restrict one's ability or opportunity to provide or deliver an exchangeable product or service.
Apparently, there are those that have either given up any attempt to provide an exchangeable product or service or have found alternative versions. Babies, in a reward based social system. Illegal products or services that are highly 'exchangable'...LOL.
There is suppression by corporations that deflect the opportunities to outside producers-foreign producers-that make the game harder...all kinds of barriers.
The fact remains that the majority find some form of solution, THEMSLVES, and carry on. That is who carries the burden.
it is the "black" as you call it that supports the poor.
Your post is pure rot...
originally posted by: Ironhawke
a reply to: MALBOSIA
I disagree, therefore I "have NO idea". Thanks..glad I have someone to tell me what I do and do not know. What I meant was this : there are economies that do not operate on the "I have so you can't" model, that there are those that do not treat it as a zero-sum game. And many are waking up to this fact. I despise the American notion that you are apparently enamoured of. I worked with the homeless for 10+ years, don't you dare tell they are the reason I have a car and a home. For shame, sir!
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: MALBOSIA
You make zero sense. How can we be stealing from them. You said yourself there's overhead, expenses.
If you think everyone is pulling their fair share, your ignoring reality.
You ignore that this system as you call it, at it's height, with 2% of the world's population produce 50% of it's manufactured goods. The system worked. it worked better than any other system ever has.
You detract from it, yet can produce no empirical evidence of a better system whatsoever.
Here's the simplicity that escapes you, It everyone produced to their full potential, no matter what product or service, there would be virtually no scarcity of ANY product or service. That includes food, housing you name it. ABUNDANCE.
Producing more than you take allows for that building to be paid for, for profit, for taxes...for the incapacitated.
That is NOT 'stealing" that is contributing to the society overall-not that there isn't those that do steal-we all contribute to that greater good, via taxes-(stealing?)-taking only a portion of what we produce in that exchange process.
I produce more than I take or is given for that production. Trying to create some artificial 'guilt' is garbage in my opinion.
The system is so flexible, that it survives stealing from the top on down to the bottom.
Amazing really....
originally posted by: Hoosierdaddy71
originally posted by: redhorse
a reply to: openminded2011
Because they don't see them as human beings or even living beings, they see them as a resource.
Employees are a resource. Sorry but that's the cold truth.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: openminded2011
A bit of a generality in this post. How about an example? Name the company and the circumstance.
I'm not saying this doesn't or isn't happening, I do see an extremely powerful H.R. that protects it's workers-perhaps to avoid legal issues-more than any time in my 65 years.
Wages and benefits should be excluded, in my opinion, as economic factors trumps and they change regularly.
Family time, pregnancy time, sick days etc. all were non-existent not that long ago.....
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: MALBOSIA
OK. By the way I've taken moose at upper loon lake of off 30 mile house in the caribou back in the day. Lived on moose and deer, salmon, trout.
Good times.....