posted on Feb, 27 2015 @ 02:51 PM
originally posted by: tanka418
So, perhaps, before you start throwing around old computer clichés around, you might want to actually become familiar with the technologies
That you throw this in my face says to me you have no idea who you're talking to with little to no knowledge of what I do for a living. Were you not
the individual who argued earlier in more than one post, that based on CCD chip mapping verification of a photo being taken by a specific camera - was
validation for the image content (!?) - then abruptly reversed position after being told how demonstrably ridiculous that is?
Ok, here's my final remarks - because I don't have time for nonsensical debate.
Much like your argument for a hand drawn star map from hypnotic recall being unique as far as star placement, it falls inevitably flat.
Perhaps rather than making foolish and uneducated statements on what I should "bone up" on, you should account with demonstrable work
derive anything useful from a hand drawn star map. I'll assume you've already done said work and had it peer reviewed by astronomers?
Oh, and make sure you take this quote from Betty Hill herself into account as well:
"As for the 8 background stars - I really do not know if they exist and in that position, or if I added them to try to show that the other stars were
seen on the sky map in the background. I know I added them to show that stars were in the background; however, as to their position on the original
skymap, I am not sure."
Remember, in science you don't get to pick and choose what lines up and what doesn't. Claiming unique alignment requires complete alignment.
The bottom line is you're starting with bad information to start with, therefore any scientific validation is not going to happen - and no matter how
ignorant you try to portray me to be, that's not going to change.
What I see is a preconceived ideology being defended rather than actual science being applied. The endgame here is scientific jargon is trying to be
applied to essentially worthless data. It's like trying to run a DNA test on fairy dust.
edit on 27-2-2015 by jritzmann because: added remarks