It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Slicky1313
ehhh, if its not for the Bible, I dont think anyone, or any documents really have been recorded about the past, like before the flood and the lives of individuals taken from no where but the Bible, cause these dudes only existed from the Bible text, where else?
Simon Peter said to him, "Let Mary leave us, for women are not worthy of life."
Jesus said, "I myself shall lead her in order to make her male, so that she too may become a living spirit resembling you males. For every woman who will make herself male will enter the kingdom of heaven."
The Gospel
According to Thomas
Simon Peter said to him, "Let Mary leave us, for women are not worthy of life."
Jesus said, "I myself shall lead her in order to make her male, so that she too may become a living spirit resembling you males. For every woman who will make herself male will enter the kingdom of heaven." [End of Quote"]
This is Jesus teasing Simon Peter. I.E.; " Peter, if you cannot handle a woman in heaven, then we shall make her a Male"
How does a Woman become Male? she cannot. Jesus is poking fun at peters comment, and playing to his insecurity. What is a Living spirit? how does a spirit resemble a Male? Jesus was playing this to the hilt, and laying down a lesson for the Church. No wonder they excluded this book from the Bible.
Jesus specifically said on Many occasions; search the Truth YOURSELF. Dont take anothers word for what i have said, search it yourself. He knew what would happen when he was gone, and he was right. The Chruch comandeered his teachings and used them as justification to murder millions and subjegate half of his true church.
There is a Massive difference between what Jesus Actually said, and did, and what Others ( including the Church) teaches jesus said and did.
Originally posted by jupiter869
These gospels are very credible.
Many religious historians feel that the gospel of Mary is the very closest to what Jesus' actual teachings of non-violence etc. were.
Originally posted by shmick25
It is obvious that these books are fakes, written by people trying to discredit the life of Christ.
First of all, they commended themselves by their tone of simplicity and truthfulness, which stood in striking contrast with the trivial, absurd, or manifestly legendary character of many of those uncanonical productions. In the next place, they had an earlier origin than most of their apocryphal rivals, and indeed many of the latter productions were directly based on the canonical Gospels. A third feature in favour of our canonical records of Christ's life was the purity of their teachings, dogmatic and moral, over against the Jewish, Gnostic, or other heretical views with which not a few of the apocryphal gospels were tainted, and on account of which these unsound writings found favour among heretical bodies and, on the contrary, discredit in the eyes of Catholics. Lastly, and more particularly, the canonical Gospels were regarded as of Apostolic authority, two of them being ascribed to the Apostles St. Matthew and St. John, respectively, and two to St. Mark and St. Luke, the respective companions of St. Peter and St. Paul.