It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AutumnWitch657
I don't think anyone is coming in the first place so one theory is as good as another if you ask me. Proponents should however stick with the story as outlined in the bible if they're going to postulate who this person might be.
PS you're doing a great job of sticking with your thread and responding to posts. So many don't tend their thread participants the way they should so good for you. I'm going to give your thread a star just for that!
a reply to: ViciLaw
originally posted by: Donice
a reply to: ViciLaw
Man I dont know where to begin, you are all for science and all yet debate the anti-christ which in essence is a religious/spiritual concept. And then you defend both sides of the field of being possible. altho science and religion can be mixed together on a subject like this I think you are far streching it.
Second off for someone claiming to go the science way, your little "prediction" of the different ages this person would be at during different events isnt backed by any facts or data which i believe the science community is all about. And besides the science community it also used to be a realy big thing here on ATS where there used to be a time where statements where backed up by well researched evidence and presented and debate in a civil way. something which is lacking here in this thread to this point
Further in your dealings with people here on this thread, flamming commentors you dont like and talking up posts you do, no matter where they fall on the science/religion side of the fence. Speaks against you in the way that it seems from my point of view you arent really here to debate or even deny ignorance in anway just the regular doom and gloom spraying that has been going rapamt on this forum for quite sometime now.
As for the debate on a anti-christ and who and what not. The christ figure is a representation of what religion would have you believe is an ideal for mankind the christ being seen as the good guy or the way to lead your live in a "good" manner. The anti-christ idea is the opposite of this it is used to brand people as "bad" or people you shouldnt not want to have any dealings with.
While if common sense is used one can understand that the notion of a anti-christ is something every living entity has in them. by the choose we make in our daily lives we can choose to be the christ(good) or the anti-christ(bad), its the age old "fight" of good vs evil evil vs good. for there can not be evil without good.
So just to try and burn the OP for his somewhat lacking post and to demonstrate the above mentioned idea in effect.
In your reactions to some post in this thread you in a way acted like an anti-christ, trying to flame people over a idea coupled with data which is in no way varified just because they have a different idea about what you stated then you do.
originally posted by: ViciLaw
I think that this one will be different and trump the previous 2 completely, just think of it. Hitler had the eyes and voice to sway crowds that means the 3rd will have the eyes and a voice to sway entire nations. Napoleon was a great strategist during his time so that means the 3rd will be a strategist beyond anyone in history of man. Now if you put religion into play he or she will probably be a new born Christian or a Muslim.
Either way, I am worried as there is no way of telling how evil the 3rd will be compared to the other 2. So we have another 10-11 years before he or she rises to power and that means the world is going to be thrown into total chaos. Thus my children lets relax and stop freaking out we still got a good 10-11 years on top of how long he or she will reign upon the Earth.
Now lets theorize what he or she will use to rise to power.
Anyone up for a cold one?