It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Should you be required to read the bible at least once to call yourself a Christian?

page: 5
7
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 31 2015 @ 10:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: NOTurTypical
a reply to: Entreri06

Was the last time you checked into astrophysics in the 1970s? Even Hubble himself didn't exactly believe red shift theory to be correct, and has since been refuted. The current guess for the beginning of the universe is called the "Lamba-Cold dark matter" concordance model and it requires energy forces that have NEVER been observed to exist!!! lmao

Absolutely nothing "confirmed" by science as you claimed.



How about: The earth revolves around the sun.




posted on Feb, 1 2015 @ 09:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: Entreri06

originally posted by: NOTurTypical
a reply to: Entreri06

Was the last time you checked into astrophysics in the 1970s? Even Hubble himself didn't exactly believe red shift theory to be correct, and has since been refuted. The current guess for the beginning of the universe is called the "Lamba-Cold dark matter" concordance model and it requires energy forces that have NEVER been observed to exist!!! lmao

Absolutely nothing "confirmed" by science as you claimed.




How about: The earth revolves around the sun.


We're talking about the Big Bang theory remember? Which you said has been "confirmed" by science. It certainly hasn't.



posted on Feb, 1 2015 @ 12:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: NOTurTypical

originally posted by: Entreri06

originally posted by: NOTurTypical
a reply to: Entreri06

Was the last time you checked into astrophysics in the 1970s? Even Hubble himself didn't exactly believe red shift theory to be correct, and has since been refuted. The current guess for the beginning of the universe is called the "Lamba-Cold dark matter" concordance model and it requires energy forces that have NEVER been observed to exist!!! lmao

Absolutely nothing "confirmed" by science as you claimed.




How about: The earth revolves around the sun.


We're talking about the Big Bang theory remember? Which you said has been "confirmed" by science. It certainly hasn't.
Didn't you say nothing has been confirmed by science?



posted on Feb, 1 2015 @ 04:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Entreri06

originally posted by: NOTurTypical

originally posted by: Entreri06

originally posted by: NOTurTypical
a reply to: Entreri06

Was the last time you checked into astrophysics in the 1970s? Even Hubble himself didn't exactly believe red shift theory to be correct, and has since been refuted. The current guess for the beginning of the universe is called the "Lamba-Cold dark matter" concordance model and it requires energy forces that have NEVER been observed to exist!!! lmao

Absolutely nothing "confirmed" by science as you claimed.




How about: The earth revolves around the sun.


We're talking about the Big Bang theory remember? Which you said has been "confirmed" by science. It certainly hasn't.
Didn't you say nothing has been confirmed by science?


No. That's an absurd claim.



posted on Feb, 1 2015 @ 04:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: NOTurTypical

originally posted by: Entreri06

originally posted by: NOTurTypical

originally posted by: Entreri06

originally posted by: NOTurTypical
a reply to: Entreri06

Was the last time you checked into astrophysics in the 1970s? Even Hubble himself didn't exactly believe red shift theory to be correct, and has since been refuted. The current guess for the beginning of the universe is called the "Lamba-Cold dark matter" concordance model and it requires energy forces that have NEVER been observed to exist!!! lmao

Absolutely nothing "confirmed" by science as you claimed.




How about: The earth revolves around the sun.


We're talking about the Big Bang theory remember? Which you said has been "confirmed" by science. It certainly hasn't.
Didn't you say nothing has been confirmed by science?


No. That's an absurd claim.
My bad ,it must have been another guy trying to make the " nothing is provin, everything is faith" argument earlier.



posted on Feb, 1 2015 @ 04:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Entreri06

originally posted by: NOTurTypical

originally posted by: Entreri06

originally posted by: NOTurTypical

originally posted by: Entreri06

originally posted by: NOTurTypical
a reply to: Entreri06

Was the last time you checked into astrophysics in the 1970s? Even Hubble himself didn't exactly believe red shift theory to be correct, and has since been refuted. The current guess for the beginning of the universe is called the "Lamba-Cold dark matter" concordance model and it requires energy forces that have NEVER been observed to exist!!! lmao

Absolutely nothing "confirmed" by science as you claimed.




How about: The earth revolves around the sun.


We're talking about the Big Bang theory remember? Which you said has been "confirmed" by science. It certainly hasn't.
Didn't you say nothing has been confirmed by science?


No. That's an absurd claim.
My bad ,it must have been another guy trying to make the " nothing is provin, everything is faith" argument earlier.


Maybe, not me. I love Physics myself. For example, E=mc^2 has been proven 14 different ways down to 19 decimal places.



new topics

top topics
 
7
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join