It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Proof of Ohio Election Fraud Exposed!!!

page: 2
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 27 2004 @ 03:09 PM
link   
Btw,

What the hell is the point in voting if you can only vote either or???

Say the country votes in a libertarian what does that mean if the electoral college is majority either or (d or r)

Hmmm??


A waste I tell you, a big #in stinkin ass waste....

A political monopoly and you endorse it by continuing to vote either or....
bah




posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 09:26 AM
link   
If a libertarian wins the most popular votes in any State, than the electors pledged to vote for him/her would be the ones that meet in the State's capital to vote for the President and Vice-President. Most likely they would all be libertarians as well, not Democrats or Republicans.



posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 09:30 AM
link   
www.gregpalast.com...

I had posted this at the time but no one seemed bothred enough to comment.



posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 09:32 AM
link   
What's really scary to me is that the Press is not jumping on this.

They must now believe that rigging elections is somehow essential for their survival.

Can you imagine such a thing?



posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 09:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by defrag99

What's really scary to me is that the Press is not jumping on this.

They must now believe that rigging elections is somehow essential for their survival.

Can you imagine such a thing?


Well if you could Grag Palast "the press" but that would be silly... he did jump on it though, just as he did in 2000. Of course he cant get work in the US for being a "troublemaker" but hey... democracy, freedom and all that!



posted on Jan, 3 2005 @ 11:09 AM
link   
Here's the latest:



Ten preliminary reasons why the Bush vote does not compute, and why Congress must investigate rather than certify the Electoral College (Part One of Two)
by Bob Fitrakis, Steve Rosenfeld and Harvey Wasserman
January 3, 2005

The presidential vote for George W. Bush does not compute.

By examining a very wide range of sworn testimonies from voters, polling officials and others close to the administration of the Nov. 2 election; by statistical analysis of the certified vote by mathematicians, election experts and independent research teams who have conducted detailed studies of the results in Ohio, New Mexico, Florida and elsewhere; from experts who studied the voting machines, tabulators and other electronic equipment on which a fair vote count has depended; and from a team of attorneys and others who have challenged the Ohio results; the freepress.org investigative team has compiled a portrait of an election whose true outcome must be investigated further by the Congress, the media and all Americans -- because it was almost certainly not an honest victory for George W. Bush.
www.freepress.org...



posted on Jan, 6 2005 @ 10:07 AM
link   
Some more stuff regarding this:

www.truthout.org...

"Sources with Rainbow-PUSH have confirmed that Senator Barbara Boxer of California will stand with House members to protest 'irregularities' during Ohio's presidential election..."



posted on Jan, 7 2005 @ 03:59 AM
link   
Well the proof of fraud is in the putting (Ohio) but sadly enough the pudding was spit right into the face of democracy on yesterday (6th). At least Boxer and Tubbs had the guts and glory to object to the results. That alone is worth a million dollars.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join