It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
if I had a solid rod that stretched from here to the other side of the galaxy, and pushed and pulled it to form a code like Morse. Then it figures that the moment I pushed one end the other end would displace immediately.
originally posted by: anonentity
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: anonentity
No. The movement from one end of the rod to the other would propagate at the material's speed of sound. You could actually observe the movement of the far end (if you had a super thought experiment telescope) before the movement propagated the length of the rod.
Think of it this way: When you push on the atoms at one end of the rod, each of those atoms pushes against its neighbors and then those atoms push against their neighbors and so on as the force of the push moves through the object like a wave.
I wasn't suggesting that such a physical rod could exist, just using it as an analogy for the means of the instant transfer, of information, which seems to exist in the quantum state. But might possibly work in this way, if it was the fabric of Space time, that acted as a connecting medium.
originally posted by: joelr
originally posted by: anonentity
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: anonentity
No. The movement from one end of the rod to the other would propagate at the material's speed of sound. You could actually observe the movement of the far end (if you had a super thought experiment telescope) before the movement propagated the length of the rod.
Think of it this way: When you push on the atoms at one end of the rod, each of those atoms pushes against its neighbors and then those atoms push against their neighbors and so on as the force of the push moves through the object like a wave.
I wasn't suggesting that such a physical rod could exist, just using it as an analogy for the means of the instant transfer, of information, which seems to exist in the quantum state. But might possibly work in this way, if it was the fabric of Space time, that acted as a connecting medium.
Hypothetical gravity waves would be similar to this type of rod you suggest in that they are made of space-time, but they do not exceed the speed of light.
originally posted by: anonentity
Instant communication would be possible across the vast distances involved. By quantum locked particles, one on the ship and another back at the base .If you modify the one on the ship, the other gets the same modification back at the base, the voice gets turned into digital code, which is massaged the other end where it gets unscrambled. Here I haven't violated the speed of light constant, I've bypassed it. Which makes me think that the whole Universe is quantum entangled. As the same effect is noticed on newly removed donor tissue as long as its viable, it seems as far as electronic resistance is concerned ,to behave the same as if it was still attached to the donor. Even from miles away.
Which seems to suggest that their is a state, where information can exit linear time, and then reform again within it. If information can do this ,and considering that as far as quantum mechanics is concerned "No information is lost" ,and that everything can be considered information. Then we have some interesting applications.
Pushing this line of thought a bit further, a photon exits a star in a galaxy far away, three million earth years later it hits our retina. Am I to believe that photon is three million years old? I doubt it, I think in its wave state it has exited linear time. Even the information it carries is information that depicts the state that its birth star was in three million years back. Has it in jumped from its wave state, into its particle state when it renters linear time? A critic would say that we know what the wave state speed of light is. But it has to have a speed as far as we are concerned because we operate within the confines of linear time, but has anyone told the photon that.?
Ipso facto...could we conclude that all wave states, exit linear time, but since we are "time locked" within this dimension.They have to have a speed to make sense to us?
originally posted by: joelr
originally posted by: anonentity
Instant communication would be possible across the vast distances involved. By quantum locked particles, one on the ship and another back at the base .If you modify the one on the ship, the other gets the same modification back at the base, the voice gets turned into digital code, which is massaged the other end where it gets unscrambled. Here I haven't violated the speed of light constant, I've bypassed it. Which makes me think that the whole Universe is quantum entangled. As the same effect is noticed on newly removed donor tissue as long as its viable, it seems as far as electronic resistance is concerned ,to behave the same as if it was still attached to the donor. Even from miles away.
Which seems to suggest that their is a state, where information can exit linear time, and then reform again within it. If information can do this ,and considering that as far as quantum mechanics is concerned "No information is lost" ,and that everything can be considered information. Then we have some interesting applications.
Pushing this line of thought a bit further, a photon exits a star in a galaxy far away, three million earth years later it hits our retina. Am I to believe that photon is three million years old? I doubt it, I think in its wave state it has exited linear time. Even the information it carries is information that depicts the state that its birth star was in three million years back. Has it in jumped from its wave state, into its particle state when it renters linear time? A critic would say that we know what the wave state speed of light is. But it has to have a speed as far as we are concerned because we operate within the confines of linear time, but has anyone told the photon that.?
Ipso facto...could we conclude that all wave states, exit linear time, but since we are "time locked" within this dimension.They have to have a speed to make sense to us?
Using entangled particles seems like a good idea but it turns out there is still a 50% error rate. I thought it would work too but I recently read a decent description of why it fails in Paul Davie's book Superforce.
I would think the whole universe should be entangled also because at the big bang everything might have been compressed together but it doesn't work out that way. If you don't entangle particles in an experiment first the entanglement features do not work. Therefore everything is not entangled.
But in a way, yes, everything is really just information.
As for wave functions, there isn't really anything to exist outside of time, it's just a mathematical construct where all the possible wavefunctions exist in a vector space. The function just describes where the probability or information will most likely be. But the information still is bound to light speed.
Remember that the "wave collapse" is somewhat of a fiction, the "waveicle" exists as both and shows exclusive behavior only when measured.
You are right about the age of the photon, it has no age. Not because it exits the time dimension and goes somewhere else but because at the speed of light zero time passes from it's reference frame.
Just like when we fly on a plane and age less by a billionth of a second, we don't exit time but our local time slows down.
originally posted by: anonentity
If the speed of the photon, is at the measurable speed of light, because it has a speed "The speed of light" then according to the maths it should age. At least a little bit. It cant turn into energy because it is already energy. So the premise is that it has exited the timeline, if it has exited the timeline, it has also exited or at least is in some state at the border of the three dimensional Universe as well. Because you cant have both.
originally posted by: anonentityThe 50% error rate could be ignored if the message was sent multiple times, and the probability of error reduced to 99.999%
originally posted by: anonentityHere the bit about the "wavicle" is interesting, I know Quantum is counter intuitive. But things at this level, should still be logical. If the photon is a particle, then it should have turned into energy at the speed of light. If its a wave, and hits something, then it stops and becomes a particle. Other electromagnetic waves, don't turn into particles when they hit something, so why should a photon, be any different. The act of observing ,in the double slit experiment, seems to say that, the photon has something of "mind" about it, as does Quantum entanglement. Which suggests at the mass level of the photon, some sort of telekinetic action is going on. Which might suggest its getting entangled with the observer.
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: joelr
Thanks for your insight, it sounds like you actually know a thing or two. Whereas I'm approaching things from another view point. With regards to the coin toss at 50/50. Their are only two outcomes, where a message would have for the sake of argument 26 characters in an alphabet. If I sent the letter "A "a hundred times. It should go through as "A" fifty times, The error of the randomness would show in the randomness of the other twenty five characters. It could be sent two hundred times, to iron out any spikes, it wouldn't matter in this case as it would be a low energy exercise and instant.
So where , in the human condition, have we anything that is out of time and space, my suggestion is that it is in the action of the human mind itself, or consciousness. If we can assume that at least a small percentage of the people who have reported OOBE,s, etc. and some of the EVPs ,can be believed. Then unless were dealing with a large section of the human population that's deluding themselves, then we already have an environment that seems to exist outside of linear time, and the physical laws of this Universe. Just because it isn't PC. to include ,it is still a model that works, just as the "Wavicle" is a model that works.
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: joelr
That's interesting with regard the spin, but does it really cause a problem?. It might if the code was binary, but if the timing was augmented as part of the code it might not be. If the frequency of the message was the code it wouldn't be a problem. Say the action is instant, between the entangled particles. The sender has the choice of timing the transfer. Like message reads... first spin change ...delay of three nanoseconds.Then the next spin change. Three nanoseconds = 1 and from then on the code can be developed digitally. Then put though a decipher at the base computer. Which could even be a hologram of the sender, talking. Or even plain old Morse code?
With regards to the particles slipping into some sort of timeless environment? during the transfer, could be the clincher clue. Because if the transfer, is instant, in this model their cant be any "Space time" between the entangled particles. This could actually be the true nature of reality. Where "Mind/brain" connection deciphers the reality from chaos into reasonable cause and effect. If it didn't the data overload would be to much to remain coherent.Which points to some interesting implications which seem to stack up from all the anecdotal data. Like some sort of infinite information web, where the transfer of data is instant, because everything is entangled. It didn't have to construct the information into readable code, its the observer who is taught to do that in linear time, from the point of observation within its mores and culture. By purely concentrating on the question in hand. Which filters out the rest of the data. Which sounds like meditation and changing states of consciousness.
Which again tends to suggest, that the quantum entanglement is not a perceived state of the particle, but a cheat in the code. That allows their to be a perception of this propensity of what we consider to be matter down at this scale. Whereas all matter is locked into the universal entanglement. But cant be perceived to be so. Because coherence would be lost. The fact that the code is not perfect allows it to change. Whereas a perfect system would be finished, and thereby redundant.