It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why isn't there a Nationalist Party?

page: 2
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 16 2014 @ 10:51 AM
link   
a reply to: BABYBULL24

RINOS are just as complicit in this as Demos, and look what that traitor Boehner did with the budget thing? He helped allow the traitor in chief get funding for his anti-American deals well past the inaugural date of the new Congress. The RINOS have no intention of stopping all these socialist and anti=American agendas.
In fact Agenda 21 is very bi-partisan. Boehner showed what he is really about in my opinion.
Nationalist Party....meh doesn't have a nice ring to it....besides we have so many other odd parties, and even Libertarian and Constitutionalist parties don't get that much traction.
We need to somehow completely break away from the two existing parties because they are both the agenda of the NWO. It is going to require a massive education campaign, but look how discussions go even on this site.




posted on Dec, 16 2014 @ 11:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: muse7
Germany had a big nationalist party in the 30s and 40s, didn't work out too well for people that didn't fit in their ideology.

yes it was a socialist party which simply broke away from the International.

There is a difference between national sovereignty and national socialism. Unfortunately people like to blur the lines. The NWO cabal today is doing away with national sovereignty and replacing all with One World Global Governance(to use the latest buzz words) and Agenda 21 is part of that and so is NAFTA/CAFTA/NAU/SPP and whatever other neat acronyms they keep coming up with. What they are doing with this illegal immigration amnesty stuff and bringing all the sick kids and disappearing them into homes and families across the nation is to so balkanize the country that there will be no cohesive concept or language to bind people together. There will be civil war as the working people have to give up their paycheck in redistribution schemes cooked up by the cabal. Socialism doesn't work and never will.



posted on Dec, 16 2014 @ 11:07 AM
link   
a reply to: MrSpad
A hint for you....we didn't take the land from Mexico, we BOUGHT it after winning the WAR they declared. Read a history book.
Otherwise I kinda agree with some of your other statements.



posted on Dec, 17 2014 @ 08:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
Why isn't there a Nationalist Party?

Er the Nazi's were a 'nationalist' party.

I pass.


Jeb bush once lived in Florida.

I live in Florida.

So therefore I MUST be Jeb Bush!!!



posted on Dec, 17 2014 @ 08:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
a reply to: MrSpad
A hint for you....we didn't take the land from Mexico, we BOUGHT it after winning the WAR they declared. Read a history book.
Otherwise I kinda agree with some of your other statements.


Is suggest you read a history book also. True we did buy some land from Mexico but not all of it some we took after the Mexican cession in 1848.



posted on Dec, 17 2014 @ 09:33 AM
link   
a reply to: BABYBULL24
The first thing that came to mind when hearing the words "Nationalist party" is that we have them. To the best of my knowledge there is an American Nazi party. While I don't agree with a lot that goes on, nationalism seems like a racist, facsist idea. Not sure that's what you were implying, just what came to mind.



posted on Dec, 17 2014 @ 04:52 PM
link   
Because of the electoral college. The electoral college keeps us trapped in the two party paradigm. States need to free their delegates to vote in accordance with their beliefs and the people they represent.
edit on 17-12-2014 by Dfairlite because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
6
<< 1   >>

log in

join