It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In that locality a high percentage are probably illegal immigrant's who dumpster dive for food etc, a lare percentage probably suffer mental problem's also and there really should be a safety net to protect such people,
It's a complicated problem with no one solution. Randomly handing out meals is nice but it does nothing to alleviate the situation.
What's wrong with simply being nice?
Why is it wrong and punishable?
Have you ever been to one of those shelters? If you have you would understand why even the worst of the destitute homeless avoid them.
originally posted by: Maluhia
a reply to: jude11
Having laws against helping those that are hungry is the most inhumane thing a society can have.
We have so many insane laws because elected officials' job is to make laws, so they have to come up with some ridiculous stuff so they can say "I was responsible for the passage of x number of laws - I'm looking out for you". What we need to do is change the job description!
originally posted by: Phage
There are such a thing as homeless shelters. Guess what? A lot of homeless don't like them because of the rules. Rules like no drinking or drugs. Rules like curfews.
Maluhia
Have you ever been to one of those shelters? If you have you would understand why even the worst of the destitute homeless avoid them.
originally posted by: Phage
Yes, sort of a dormitory type atmosphere. They offer security, hygiene (toilets, showers), and food. They are not a home but they are far better than living on the street. They also require sobriety and do not allow illegal activity because anything otherwise would endanger all of the residents of the shelter. Some people will not, or cannot deal with such restrictive rules.
originally posted by: Phage
There are a lot of different kinds of people who are homeless. Giving them a place to congregate (for meals) and offering them nothing else may sound like a really nice thing to do but it does nothing to correct the problem of either the homeless themselves or the community.
www.homelessshelterdirectory.org...
originally posted by: Phage
Maybe in the portable toilets that the law requires those groups who are feeding the homeless within the law supply?
originally posted by: Phage
Give them a place where they can get a free meal then hang out for the next 24 hours waiting for the next one? Ok. How does that help them get off the street? How does that protect them? How does that help the community?
It's a complicated problem with no one solution. Randomly handing out meals is nice but it does nothing to alleviate the situation.
originally posted by: Phage
Compassion is a great thing but handing out food under the wrong circumstances doesn't necessarily help the situation.
compassion balanced with with practicality
He is not one individual. He is the President of the Love Thy Neighbor organization.
You have a good point, but should the burden be entirely on one individual who does not have the means?
An inconvenience is it? No health concerns? No other concerns?
Would you rather have them starve than create an inconvenience? Until we find a system that works that is the alternative in some cases.
originally posted by: Phage
He is not one individual. He is the President of the Love Thy Neighbor organization.
lovethyneighbor.org...
An inconvenience is it? No health concerns? No other concerns?
No, I would not rather they starve. I would rather that those who really need help get it. As I said, the acts of civil disobedience have served their purpose, brought to law to the attention of the court.
I would rather that those who really need help get it.
As I said, the acts of civil disobedience have served their purpose, brought to law to the attention of the court.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: LABTECH767
In that locality a high percentage are probably illegal immigrant's who dumpster dive for food etc, a lare percentage probably suffer mental problem's also and there really should be a safety net to protect such people,
I agree. What do you do? Send them back to where they came from? Ok. Force them into a mental institution? Ok, but you can't do that.
Give them a place where they can get a free meal then hang out for the next 24 hours waiting for the next one? Ok. How does that help them get off the street? How does that protect them? How does that help the community?
It's a complicated problem with no one solution. Randomly handing out meals is nice but it does nothing to alleviate the situation.
In 2005, Utah adopted a 10-year plan to end chronic homelessness. After nearly a decade, enormous progress has been made, with a 72 percent decrease in the number of the chronic homeless, from almost 1,800 to less than 500.
In one of the leading examples around the nation of counterintuitive thinking, Utah has been giving away apartments to the homeless. It is a program has actually saved Utah money. For each homeless person, estimates for emergency medical bills alone are more than $16,000 a year on average. Giving them an apartment costs about $11,000. And it has drastically reduced the need for emergency medical visits.
Outside of medical, various other costs, including legal and justice system costs are estimated to add another $20,000 to $30,000 dollars a year (depending on the location). Utah’s housing, and support for the individuals once they are residing in a home, cuts those total costs by over half, all-in-all, from about $19,000 a year to under $8,000.
The largest decreases in homelessness since 2012 were seen in Florida (7,308) and Colorado (7,014).