It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: Korg Trinity
where do you think the line is between artificial intelligence and true or natural intelligence?
originally posted by: rom12345
can it pass the turing test
Here is a interesting article on a chat bot the nearly did
The Biometric processing capabilities are interesting,if not a little creepy.
I am sure the church of scientology must realise how this system, makes there E-meter very outdated, They should probably upgrade, to really head f##k people 2014 style.
No it wasn't designed to pass the Turin test. It isn't pretending to be human. What it does do is using a variety of techniques to sense mood and contextualize data input and output.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Korg Trinity
No it wasn't designed to pass the Turin test. It isn't pretending to be human. What it does do is using a variety of techniques to sense mood and contextualize data input and output.
So I gave it a look and it doesn't appear to have been actually designed or to actually exist.
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Korg Trinity
Well, I won't be ordering one. Just let me know when someone actually gets one and can actually review the product. Until then, its not a real product. Chances are slim to none that this is real and works as advertised. So far everything I have seen can be mocked up. At best, its a chat Bot. There is no indication it does anything more than follow a chat Bot script.
Sorry, I don't like scams. I really hope I am wrong.
my emoto-Bot is sad now
I think you are extremely negative and short sighted.
As you and others have pointed out... all the technology to make this work exists in the public domain. there is really no reason to doubt the product. They are not making outlandish promises or showing off something that could not be realistically released as a product today.
Operation
◾System Google Android 4. 2. 2
◾CPU QUAD CORE 1.8Ghz
◾EPU (Emotion Processing Unit) 20MHz
◾DDR3 2GB
◾Nand Flash 8GB
◾Networking WiFi 802.11b/g/n 10/100Mbps
◾With internal Antenna
◾Support Bluetooth 4.
originally posted by: Korg Trinity
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: Korg Trinity
where do you think the line is between artificial intelligence and true or natural intelligence?
Firstly there is nothing Artificial about Intelligence, the means by which that intelligence emerges and the platform it runs upon may very well be man made... but that doesn't mean we should think any less of non human intelligences.
These days even your coffee machine is likely to have some form of intelligence, a microprocessor that makes decisions based upon inputs... albeit an intelligence that is extremely limited in scope...
So I think the question should not be where is the line on intelligence... more the case, the question should be where is the line for non-awareness and self awareness as in consciousness, now that is a far more difficult question to answer.
One may argue that Consciousness is an emergent property of a data network of sufficient complexity and data processing speeds. This would be my view on this subject, as such I see ourselves as little more than biological machines.
On the other hand there are those that believe that our bodies play host to consciousness whose source is ethereal and non corporal in nature.
I think if you subscribe to the second premise you are unlikely to believe that machine intelligence will ever be truly alive and conscious. Even if the machine exhibits the traits of a conscious mind, those people will state that it only is a superficial show... a programmed response or a pretense.
I personally believe that we will see true fully conscious self aware machine intelligences within the next 20 years, I think the line will be crossed and when it does I think there won't be any doubt.
These are my thoughts as requested
Korg.
originally posted by: glass87onion
There won't be an ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE similar to human beings till we figure out (if we ever will) how human intelligence/awareness arises. You can't 'program' a machine to do something you don't know how it works.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: glass87onion
There won't be an ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE similar to human beings till we figure out (if we ever will) how human intelligence/awareness arises. You can't 'program' a machine to do something you don't know how it works.
is consciousness something that can be programmed?
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: glass87onion
There won't be an ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE similar to human beings till we figure out (if we ever will) how human intelligence/awareness arises. You can't 'program' a machine to do something you don't know how it works.
is consciousness something that can be programmed?
First explain what consciousness is and how it works. Programming code is nothing more than text compiled into instructions that a CPU can execute. Programming can't become conscious any more than written instructions on how to change a light bulb
which is why im wondering if consciousness cant be programmed, only uploaded...but at what point in evolutionary history did consciousness become a thing?
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: TzarChasm
which is why im wondering if consciousness cant be programmed, only uploaded...but at what point in evolutionary history did consciousness become a thing?
it became a thing when someone came up with the word and tried to define it. Best I can tell, there is no real definition and its really not a thing. To me its more like a concept to keep humans distinct from everything else.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: TzarChasm
which is why im wondering if consciousness cant be programmed, only uploaded...but at what point in evolutionary history did consciousness become a thing?
it became a thing when someone came up with the word and tried to define it. Best I can tell, there is no real definition and its really not a thing. To me its more like a concept to keep humans distinct from everything else.
consciousness is not an exclusively human property. and just because we came up with the word does not mean the "thing" we are describing doesn't exist.
"Consciousness is the quality or state of awareness, or, of being aware of an external object or something within oneself. It has been defined as: sentience, awareness, subjectivity, the ability to experience or to feel, wakefulness, having a sense of selfhood, and the executive control system of the mind." these concepts define something that is more than just a handful of syllables said with a meaningful look.
Experimental research on consciousness presents special difficulties, due to the lack of a universally accepted operational definition. In the majority of experiments that are specifically about consciousness, the subjects are human, and the criterion that is used is verbal report: in other words, subjects are asked to describe their experiences, and their descriptions are treated as observations of the contents of consciousness.[71