Originally posted by Asia Minor
This is not one of them stupid pan-anfrican forums where stupid pro-black ststements are the official posts and the rests are jibberish.
Of course its not. That hardly prevents some of what you say from being unintelligent jibberish.
You have laid down no science
You have presented no science, so why should I whip out diagrams and references?
and simply critique
Yes, critique, rationally and logically critique. Is there supposed to be some sort of problem with that?
out of your own emotional insecurity.
I don't like debating with blacks as Negro ideaology is disturbing to me, so I'd rather if you do no direct references to me.
hahaha, you stupid moron!
I clearly stated(you avoided the quote I see) that skin color isn't neccessary and it isn't.
Actually I did address the issue of what melanin does. Its not 'unecessary'. Its difficult for albinos to be an albino, and only an idiot would
suggest that white people can't survive in, say, africa. I'd think the boers and berbers would object to that! The point is, melanin blocks UV
radiation. UV radiation is carcinogenic/mutagenic. Cancer is bad, therefore, if there is enough UV radiation, then more melanin = less Uv which
means less mutagnically cuased cancers which means greater fitness. Hence melanin concentration in skin will tend to increase in that situation.
Your inability to undestand the arguement for when and how melanin is beneficial hardly means that it is not beneficial.
Modern man does not include the Negro, Americana and Cro-Magnoid types of people.
All living human beings are anatomically modern humans.
You must be senile indeed because you state that chimps are mutants, humans are mutants and apes are mutants but ridiculously ask "are whites
Actually, its entirely possible for 'white' populations to not be a result of mutation. While mutations and alterations of genes might be required
to go from chimp to man, that is not so in the trivial change from one concentration of melanin in the epidermis to another. So whites indeed need
not be mutant blacks.
Your one of those miseducated Pan-Africans or black muslims that spew poisions of which you yourself are not immune to.
More stunning revelations of you ignorance. I suppose it infects all topics with you no?
You stated that a mutant can be called a mutant regardless of standards. How simple can you really be? In that case we ALL are mutants and the
white race need not to be singled out to be questioned as a mutant.
Ok. And your point is????
Then the bozo says the caucasian is a mutated ape but believes that his race was what whites came from.
I notice this fails to address the logic of darker skin resulting in greater fitness in tropical environments. Taken in hand with the origins of man
being in africa, and you have, in all likelyhood, dark skinned populations as the original populations, regardless of the colour of chimps underneath
their fur. And, again, by your own logic of dark skin filling the protective role that chimp hair used to have, then as the chimps lost hair their
skin being conversely darker and darker.
This way the idiot really embarasses himself.
The meaningless bluster of someone that can barely hold a conversation.
For if whites came from blacks, then who would be closer to the ape.
Nothing in my statements necessitates that the original populations were the same as modern african 'bantu' blacks. Indeed, thats rather unlikely.
All I have said is that they very probably were dark skinned. What difference would it make which modern population preceded the other one, none are
more 'chimplike' than the other anyway and all are modern humans. There was a long series of other species that interceded between actual chimps
Not only that, he
Hey, dumbass, in case you haven't noticed you are talking to me, not some 'audience'. If there were an audience listening to you then you'd be
playing the comedic role.
states clearly that no one knows the skin solor of the early men evolving from apes therefore they could have been white or pinkish.
Indeed, they very well might've been.
If he doesn't know what he "know", then what makes him think that he knows anything?
Says a guy who beleives aliens from beyond came here and engineer everything.
He simply wrote a post filled with emotions and lacking facts.
There is no need to refer to yourself in the third person here....
The human man was here for hundreds of millions of years
All evidence contradicts this.
If man was designed in the image of God then why would he need to come from something that is of an inferior type?
Please demonstrate that the original assumption is true.
[edit on 23-2-2005 by Asia Minor]
[edit on 23-2-2005 by Asia Minor]
Wow, you only had to edit that post twice before you got it to yer liking eh? Good boy.
Well, no one came fro Africa
All evidence, fossil and genetic, indicates that man originated in africa.
It is no accident that caucasians are technologically advanced
Indeed, it required great effort throughout history and ultimately the advancement of rational thought during the Enlightenment and the industrial
revolution resulted in the technological edge that the West has.
Man's age is longer than you think.
You keep repeating this like some kind of moron and yet present nothing to substantiate it.