It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Have a for instance ? ... Don't forget RT's target is the west .The wests propaganda target is the west .Could it be determined that maybe just maybe RT is offering opposing views? The western MSM all seem to be speaking in concert with one another .Heck Harper's speech and Australian PM were verbatim when taking us into a war over there . Some things have to make you wonder just what's what . a reply to: seabhac-rua
Sometimes their meddling pays off
Two things about that . 1. was it blow back or was it something that was already determined to be a result the US could live with ? I have no idea what Russia invaded to begin with but ,I thought that I read somewhere that they were sucked into doing that .Someone wanted to give Russia their Vietnam war . By overthrowing Libya they created the vacuum in power that could only be filled by the rebels and I see the same thing in Syria . Could it be that that is the plan ? To destabilize those countries and allow terrorist take power ? If it's not the plan ,it sure seems the way things are turning .Blow-back , or intended consequences .?? a reply to: seabhac-rua
Well, look at the Afghani Mujahideen, for example, with US backing they carried out pretty successful insurgency during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, from a certain point of view this was a 'pay off' for the US, then the US had to fight these guys again in 2001, which was an unforeseen 'backfire'.
originally posted by: Ridhya
a reply to: seabhac-rua
I disagree that the US just takes advantage of situations, they certainly manufacture them as well, such as the uprisings and assassinations in S America... Direct Subversive Intervention is a covert way to sway things in your favour!