It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: micpsi
Back in the 1980s, a theoretical physicist provided astounding evidence that quarks are NOT point-like but composite bound states of three preons. First of all, he pointed out that the magnetic form factor for the proton varies at high t (t = - square of momentum transfer) as (-t)^(-2). This is consistent with quarks being composed of three point-like Dirac fermions. However, it did not constitute proof because standard calculations in QED derive the same asymptotic behaviour. Quark compositeness has not yet been detected because the beam energies provided by CERN's LHC have not been high enough (the energies that become available in a year or two may provide such a signature). Then he proved that a huge body of research carried out between 1895 and 1908 by two people claiming to be able to remote-view atoms are consistent with facts of nuclear and particle physics established only many decades after this work was published.
If you want to see what quarks look like when remote-viewed, see here. The scientific analysis of this research may be found here.
originally posted by: tadaman
EDIT TO ADD:
"Pros"? Wanna be´s only play with words so that no one understands. Masters can explain things so others can understand. Your not good until you can make others do what you do.
Those that can do, do.
Those who cannot, teach.
The proficient, help others understand.
While masters, break new ground and exist in a class entirely on their own.
originally posted by: Adaluncatif
If you think of quarks as point particles, the neutron is a 2 dimensional triangle with +2/3 charge at one corner and -1/3 charge at the other two corners, giving it a net charge of 0. If you take 3 neutrons, each one rotated by 60 degrees and stack them on top of each other, you have a trineutron with zero charge on all three corners, zero charge but no charge distribution unlike the neutron.
This new particle cannot interact with other particles except through gravity.
originally posted by: kelbtalfenek
a reply to: Adaluncatif
Interesting theory but it would have been discovered in a large collider, if it was such.