It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: PowerStruggle
Global Warming is supposedly caused by Human beings. Bill Gates devised a formula at TED and let the convention know about this.
...
originally posted by: abecedarian
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: abecedarian
Well that is even further apart.
For the diesel engine 1.6L golf you have the HP below.
1.6L 54 PS (40 kW; 53 hp) I4
1.6L 70 PS (51 kW; 69 hp) I4 TD
Here is a link to VW releasing the 1.6L diesel again.green.autoblog.com...
The 1.6-liter will be available at power levels ranging from 74 to 103 hp.
I can guarantee the MPG will be higher than 30.
So there you have an apples to apples comparison. Engine technology has increased both in performance and MPG and at the same time the cars have reduced their emissions while adding more features into them.
In reality, even the turbo diesel had problems achieving more than 30MPG.
So?
Abstract
Over the last century, northeast Pacific coastal sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and land-based surface air temperatures (SATs) display multidecadal variations associated with the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, in addition to a warming trend of ∼0.5–1 °C. Using independent records of sea-level pressure (SLP), SST, and SAT, this study investigates northeast (NE) Pacific coupled atmosphere–ocean variability from 1900 to 2012, with emphasis on the coastal areas around North America. We use a linear stochastic time series model to show that the SST evolution around the NE Pacific coast can be explained by a combination of regional atmospheric forcing and ocean persistence, accounting for 63% of nonseasonal monthly SST variance (r = 0.79) and 73% of variance in annual means (r = 0.86). We show that SLP reductions and related atmospheric forcing led to century-long warming around the NE Pacific margins, with the strongest trends observed from 1910–1920 to 1940. NE Pacific circulation changes are estimated to account for more than 80% of the 1900–2012 linear warming in coastal NE Pacific SST and US Pacific northwest (Washington, Oregon, and northern California) SAT. An ensemble of climate model simulations run under the same historical radiative forcings fails to reproduce the observed regional circulation trends. These results suggest that natural internally generated changes in atmospheric circulation were the primary cause of coastal NE Pacific warming from 1900 to 2012 and demonstrate more generally that regional mechanisms of interannual and multidecadal temperature variability can also extend to century time scales.
originally posted by: abecedarian
It always, or rather never, ceases to amaze me, how little of reality makes its way into scientific studies.
All of the 'models' are about atmospheric CO2 and methane concentrations... what about water vapor?
My 1972 Pontiac 6.2L Firebird, getting around 14MPG put out about as much CO2 per mile as my 1981 VW Scirocco getting 30MPG.
What's up with that, by the way? How did we manage 30MPG in the 80's and now we're struggling to get to the 30's? My mom's 1973 Dodge Coronet, 318CID V8, could pull 25MPG if one was easy on the pedal.
I face palm any time I see, hear or read someone blaming CO2 emissions as the cause of 'climate change'.
One hundred years ago, with a global human population of a Billion or so, we generated heat to take a train, cook our food and that was about it. One hundred years later, and now we're at NINE billion, give or take. We generate HEAT here, simply by being alive. We generate HEAT here, simply by cooking our food and driving our cars, much like before, but only 9 times as many people.
Is it not logical to assume a commensurate increase in heat?
/me waits for the logical discussion.
All of the 'models' are about atmospheric CO2 and methane concentrations... what about water vapor?
originally posted by: raymundoko
Naturally occurring changes in winds, not human-caused climate change, are responsible for most of the warming on land and in the sea along the West Coast of North America over the last century, a study has found.
The climate change models they currently use do not have the ability to factor in all the variables.
Really, they are today's equivalent of Nostradamus looking into a pot of water.
Gradually Global Warming will be proven wrong, and the only thing global about it will be the fact the Global Elite want to use it to maintain their 1st world status and keep the 3rd world from exploiting cheap resources.