Yep, I have been very suspicious about the 'official story' about Fukushima and the earthquake for a long time. At first, I thought they were
downplaying the radiation, but that seemed to be the 'mainstream thinking', and I have learned, that whenever mainstream is lead to think anything,
it's usually wrong, or at least a distorted view of what really happened. And masses do not research or think, so their viewpoints are not to be
Then I started reading these articles about the earthquake not having been 9.0. I wondered about that myself - how could a HUGELY DEVASTATING 9.0 just
leave all the buildings undamaged (even the old, unprotected, un-earthquake-proof ones)? Sure, the tsunami
caused a lot of damage and all that
- but I always read and was taught that an earthquake of NINE magnitude (or Richter, which, I know, is slightly different, but it shouldn't matter in
this case) would be
COMPLETELY DEVASTATING AND CITY-OBLITERATING MONSTROSITY
.. but instead, it looks like it's "nothing much", and everything goes like 'business as usual'. Not even one building fell down.
From a nine point zero earthquake.
Uh..? I always thought anything over six is pretty big and serious, and seven would be ten times as bad as that - eight would be ten times as bad as
the seven! (Or however the exponentiality works in this case)
Something like nine, would be so unbelievably, unimaginably horrificly astonishing and devastating that it would surpass any definition of a
'catastrophe' - it would be a CATACLYSMIC event by any common sense definition of the word!
And yet, not one single building fell down. No earthquake damage _WHATSOEVER_, before the tsunami comes and does its own damage. What?
And people believe this?
Just look at the videos and photos, and show me any earthquake damage from a supposedly cataclysmic nine magnitude quake!
Here's a little something for those people who always demand links and things, 'or it didn't happen' (does anyone have proof-links to 9.0 having
The 3/11 Earthquake was not 9.0
What is the truth behind all the 'official stories'?
Did Oswald kill JFK? Who killed Oswald?
Did NASA really send men on the moon? Why hasn't _ANYONE_ duplicated this feat in 40 years or so? Why can't they go back?
Did Osama Bin Laden, a cave-dweller really have his men skillfully guide jet planes into WTC towers and Pentagon? Did building 7 just collapse out of
Did the Japanese just attack Pearl Harbor just for the heck of it? Did no one really have any prior knowledge of this event?
Were the nuclear explosions real, or was firebombing and big, regular explosions used instead? Why are there non-wood buildings and even trees
standing right at the epicenter immediately after the blasts?
Did Bruce Lee, perhaps the healthiest man on Earth at the time, just die because he was allergic to a sleeping pill?
When you look at the 'official stories' without any emotions, just rationally investigating all the wild claims, don't they seem a little bit too
weird and 'fantastic' to be true, when you compare them to what you otherwise know about the world, the laws of physics and how things work?
And aren't they a little bit too convenient for the 'people with lust for power'? Oh, nuclear explosions - well, it's too big a thing for a common man
to ever fully understand or know, it's too complicated, it's too micro-scale to investigate, and the devastation is just too huge for anyone to ever
experiment and reproduce the results in a lab or somewhere independently, so WE JUST ALL HAVE TO TRUST THE OFFICIAL STORY for the truth..
Have governments of this planet ALWAYS told the truth to the people they are supposedly governing, and nothing but the truth?
The alarming thing is that usually here in ATS, which is supposed to be ABOUT CONSPIRACIES, first and foremost (apparently, not anymore), pretty much
no one questions the 'official story' about almost anything anymore. When I come here to look for the conspiracy about Fukushima, I only see the word
misspelled a lot (it's NOT "Fukishima", for crying out loud!), and lots of worry about the radiation or whatnot - but I don't see anything about the
earthquake, and how it was falsely reported to be 9.0.
That's something one would reasonably expect to find on a CONSPIRACY WEBSITE, but apparently, that just doesn't happen. What the heck is going on,
when even conspiracy sites don't talk about obvious conspiracies and discrepancies in what we have been told and with what actually looks to have
happened (or not happened)?
In any case, I hope I left at least someone with something to ponder - I know there will be lots of attacks and shaming language, ad hominems and such
as replies to this post, but that's the way of ATS, and it's the way of this crazy world. All I can do is just try to bring at least some truth to
some places, and hope that the ones that process before judging, might actually find some of it valuable, and spread it around, until no one has to
remain in the sea of lies against their will.
And if this is the only way it can be done, so be it. Let the attacks, ad hominems, accusations and shaming language begin!
edit on 30-8-2014 by Shoujikina because: (no reason given)