posted on Aug, 18 2014 @ 03:42 PM
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
You do not know what you are talking about. Again.
In your use of the word, it is apparent that you do not even know what "disingenuous" means.
Allow me to correct you here and now, so that you may improve in the future. It's disingenuous if I pretend to know less
about something than
I really do.
“This one here looks like his head was bent downward,” he said, indicating the wound at the very top of Mr. Brown’s head. “It can be
because he’s giving up, or because he’s charging forward at the officer.”
Specifically, that shot in the head - as I mentioned - is the one he speaks to be 'charging forward or giving up.'
You are misrepresenting my words. I said "ergo, the head was bent or he was prone on the ground"
, which is the only way physics allows for
that shot to have struck him in the manner that it did
. Dr. Baden says it was the former, and I'm not in any way disagreeing with that. I'm
saying those are the only two ways he could have gotten hit in that manner to relay the angle at which it struck Brown
. It came from 'above'
relative to him standing straight, which means his head was bent (as Dr. Baden says) or he was prone on the ground.
What is wrong with you
, because you sure as hell seem to have a horse in this race to me.
edit on 15Mon, 18 Aug 2014 15:44:16
-0500America/ChicagovAmerica/Chicago8 by Greven because: (no reason given)