It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And to speculate further,
What if the autopsy shows that multiple gunshot wounds entered Brown's chest (not back) at different distances.
Possibly indicating Brown was approaching the police officer as opposed to running away or standing still.
originally posted by: Tardacus
i suspect that the autopsy confirms the police side of the incident (I.E. no gunshots to the back, gunshot residue on the victims hands,etc) so the defense and the DOJ want a chance to try and fudge the results to make the not so innocent victim appear more innocent by doing their own autopsy.
originally posted by: Wrabbit2000
a reply to: FarleyWayne
Perhaps it has to do with the fact that some street protesters have Palestinians in the Middle East to thank for their informed response to tear gas attack on Wednesday night.
You can never imagine how humiliating it was to read from #OccupyOakland, the (insert the link here) was conveying real time advice and council for those engaged in the street, from Palestinians with experience countering what they were facing.
To see my nation....come to this..is beyond depressing. When Palestinians are the help OUR citizens turn to for handling confrontation with authority? Where..oh where...did we ever go SO far off the rails?? We aren't even on the track bed anymore.
I agree with you and if this is a True accounting of the incident as it took place.
The officer was not in the wrong and the official autopsy should have proved that with out a doubt.
originally posted by: mwood
"IF" the cop was in the wrong and killed the man wrongly, what will change in the world?
"If" the guy attacked the cop and was killed what will change in the world?
Why does it matter to you either way?
Do you know him?
Do you know his family?
Are you a white knight crusading for justice in the world?
This is nothing more than a sporting event where people pick a side and cheer for it and hope their side "wins".
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: theantediluvian
If they are performing a 2nd autopsy, then I'd wager that there already is some question(s) being raised as to the results.
Because Johnson is now a federal witness,
Bosley said he will not be doing anymore television
originally posted by: Libertygal
The one by Mo. Coroner, the one by Boden, and then the DOJ one.
I would wager the question is, why are there no gunshot wounds in his back?
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
Do you know if both of these people are fairly local to Ferguson?
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Libertygal
Also, making a deal with the feds would as far as I know, only give him immunity from prosecution at the federal level and what federal crime would he be prosecuted for?