'ISIS a pretext for US-sponsored regime change in Iraq'

The whole world is going to # in such a manner it's nearly impossible to tell who is cahooting with who, and who is bombing who with who's bombs. This is a cluster # of epic proportions and something tells me that at this point, even CIA analysts are probably scratching their collective heads.

Either this really is some crazy grandiose scheme or one true nightmare of unintended consequences.

Points:

What is the real reason Obama won’t take out ISIS? The neo-con foreign policy of threatening Syria into submission. Is that why Obama treats IS with kid gloves? He wants to keep them a viable force against Assad.

Are the conspiracy sites, Global Research and Alex Jones among many others, correct in their assertion that IS is a NATO CIA operation to destabilize the Mideast?

Also, is IS overrated as a military force and only, like a predator, taking advantage of the weakened states Syria and Iraq?

Also, now that Malaki has left will Obama devise a strategic plan to destroy IS and spar the innocents in Iraq the sure genocide they face if IS is allowed to continue their rampage?

Point in question here is that why isn’t anyone in the MSM talking heads framing this issue in the light of the Syrian war where the US wants to destroy Syria and at the same time fight terrorism and this new kid on the bloc IS. The US claims to no longer want to overthrow Assad.

Then why are they still trying to give aid to the Syrian rebels when they know this will actually help IS.? Worst of all they, IS, would likely end up getting their hands on any weapons they would give the FSA, the Syrian moderate rebels fighting Assad.

There is no where in the MSM any real in-depth deep analysis of this tricky serpentine war.

And people claim this MSM isn’t managed as much as RT!
Yeah Sure…

a reply to: theabsolutetruth

I think what you say is a good possibility. It remains to be seen.

That list would be interesting. Sanctions on US (via Syria) anyone?

News

The resolution stated that the UNSC “deplores and condemns in the strongest terms the terrorist acts of ISIL (Islamic State) and its violent extremist ideology, and its continued gross, systematic and widespread abuses of human rights and violations of international humanitarian law,” adding that those who finance, recruit or supply weapons to the insurgents might be sanctioned as well.

originally posted by: theabsolutetruth
a reply to: Willtell

The thing is, perhaps the US isn't all that interested in stopping ISIS as it was and IS as it is, at least until it has done whichever thing it is the US wants of them.

.

* 4 U..... You must have either read the link I gave or else you are astute enough to 'see' the bigger Picture with this WH CIC Pretender

I believe they are GROOMING an enemy for a nice big bloody fight. All they need are enough identifying factors of a country and they can kill it.

a reply to: Willtell

Ask any American if they would like another prolonged war in Iraq and Syria and whether or not we can afford it - what with having a hard time taking care of our veterans, and our own problems.

Middle east needs to figure itself out. Let America set herself right again.

War, people's lives, and our own problems are not some damn game on a chessboard.