It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

House Votes to Sue Obama (Updated) (Video)

page: 3
12
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 31 2014 @ 08:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sremmos80
What if Obama didn't do any of your what ifs that fill your post??


He has - research and learn.


originally posted by: Sremmos80
What if he is just doing what every president has done?

He hasen't since his EO's are violating the Constitution. Previous Presidents did not have this issue to the extent Obama does.


originally posted by: Sremmos80
What if this lawsuit is completely bull?

Its bull not to do it. Failing to act invites further illegal action by Obama via Executive Orders.



originally posted by: Sremmos80
What if it rained lemon drops and malt balls?

Whatever happens in your world is your business. I dont see what relevance it has in this thread.




posted on Jul, 31 2014 @ 08:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
If we allow the President to continue to illegally use executive orders to make changes, why should we assume it will only be restricted to immigration or the aca.


Except Obama is NOT illegally using EOs, but keep posting your little fantasy if it amuses you!



posted on Jul, 31 2014 @ 09:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: Xcathdra
If we allow the President to continue to illegally use executive orders to make changes, why should we assume it will only be restricted to immigration or the aca.


Except Obama is NOT illegally using EOs, but keep posting your little fantasy if it amuses you!


That remains to be seen.

Can't wait for the court decisions coming.

Like the Fast & Furious decision earlier today.




posted on Jul, 31 2014 @ 10:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
Can't wait for the court decisions coming.


I predict it will go the same way as the stupid birther court cases!

But first we have to wait for them to actually start a lawsuit!
edit on 31-7-2014 by hellobruce because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 31 2014 @ 10:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: xuenchen
Can't wait for the court decisions coming.


I predict it will go the same way as the stupid birther court cases!

But first we have to wait for them to actually start a lawsuit!


Well Obama's track record in court cases that involve the laws and whatnot is not so good.

He has lost some big cases.

The birth issue is more "personal" and not based on actions by Obama that affect laws.




posted on Jul, 31 2014 @ 10:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
The birth issue is more "personal"


Yes, some people personally hate the fact a black man is the legal POTUS, so they made up all sorts of nonsense and stupid claims about Obama - and lost every single one of them,



posted on Jul, 31 2014 @ 11:12 PM
link   
a reply to: hellobruce

Relax.

This topic is in a news forum, not the mud pit.

Obama has lost several key court cases that directly involve his "interpretations".




posted on Aug, 1 2014 @ 12:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: Xcathdra
If we allow the President to continue to illegally use executive orders to make changes, why should we assume it will only be restricted to immigration or the aca.


Except Obama is NOT illegally using EOs, but keep posting your little fantasy if it amuses you!


Actually he has... Brush up on what an EO is, how an EO is applied and to what branch of Government its restricted to. Brush up on he responsibilities of Congress and those of the President, compare them, and see which branch is allowed by the Constitution to change / draft / remove laws.

Take the ACA as an example. That law has specific dates that segments of the law are to kick in. There is nothing contained in the ACA that allows any types of delays to occur, nor is anything in the law that allows the President or OPM to delay / change / modify the ACA.

Using an EO, Obama has pushed / delayed deadlines for the ACA.

That use of an EO is illegal.



posted on Aug, 1 2014 @ 12:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: xuenchen
Can't wait for the court decisions coming.


I predict it will go the same way as the stupid birther court cases!

But first we have to wait for them to actually start a lawsuit!


Well the Federal courts have ruled against Obama and executive privilege on the fast and furious debacle, with the judge ordering the DOJ to turn over all files related to it.

The courts ruled Obama acted illegally and violated the constitution when he decided the Senate was not in session and appointed members to the NRLB.

The only people in fantasy land are those who think Obama has not violated the Constitution or abused executive privilege or executive orders.



posted on Aug, 1 2014 @ 12:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: xuenchen
The birth issue is more "personal"


Yes, some people personally hate the fact a black man is the legal POTUS, so they made up all sorts of nonsense and stupid claims about Obama - and lost every single one of them,


Ah... the race card... sad.

Obama's race has absolutely nothing to do with his stupidity and incompetence and for some people to try and make that argument apparently cannot defend Obama on his accomplishments that refute the accusations.

I don't like Obama, not because he is black, but because he is shredding the Constitution while representing the interests for foreigners over those who elected him.

Race is not an issue and for those to try and argue it is are the racists.



posted on Aug, 1 2014 @ 12:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
Obama's race


Is a issue to birthers - that is the reason they make all sorts of silly claims about Obama and have tried so many silly lawsuits - which is what I said.



posted on Aug, 1 2014 @ 12:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: MOMof3
I remember when democrats wanted to impeach Bush, but they played nice. I hope they have learned their lesson to never play nice with a republican president again. They have persecuted this man since day 1.


Just for one, lets just mention how our current president has used drones to kill families and hundreds of children and babies in countries overseas, and then boasted that he was getting good at it.

Why anyone would want to persecute Obama for doing these noble and humanitarian things is really beyond me...

And seems to be beyond you too.



posted on Aug, 1 2014 @ 12:37 AM
link   
a reply to: hellobruce

NO,no,no it's not his skin,he's a traitor. And we want him removed in the same dishonor he has successfully executed during his attack,feel free to call Dr.Ben Carson if you wish.



posted on Aug, 1 2014 @ 12:38 AM
link   
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Is that different the getting us into 2 useless wars that killed women and children as well?
edit on stFri, 01 Aug 2014 00:45:01 -0500America/Chicago820140180 by Sremmos80 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 1 2014 @ 12:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: Xcathdra
Obama's race


Is a issue to birthers - that is the reason they make all sorts of silly claims about Obama and have tried so many silly lawsuits - which is what I said.


Which has nothing to do with what we are discussing now does it. It doesn't even fit into the topic at all unless the attempt is to try and compare the latest court actions on Obamas illegal use of executive orders and somehow link that action into the birther movement.

If I recall you are the one who brought up birther issues, not me.

Please try to remain on topic while also understanding the birther movement was initiated by civilians where as the latest court actions against Obama and his illegal use of EO's is based on the House / civil rights / government watchdog groups etc.

There is a difference between the 2.
edit on 1-8-2014 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 1 2014 @ 12:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
where as the latest court actions against Obama and his illegal use of EO's is based on the House / civil rights / government watchdog groups etc.


What court action? They have not actually done anything, just whined about Obama.......................



posted on Aug, 1 2014 @ 01:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: Xcathdra
where as the latest court actions against Obama and his illegal use of EO's is based on the House / civil rights / government watchdog groups etc.


What court action? They have not actually done anything, just whined about Obama.......................

Really, You don't ever read any other news source other than MSNBC or Huff or listen to NPR.
Here you go,,,,, Let me help you out,,,,


CHARLESTON — West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey on Tuesday said his ofice has filed a lawsuit challenging President Barack Obama’s practice of “cherry-picking which laws his administration will enforce.”

Now you read that correct, the Words Lawsuit!


The lawsuit, filed Tuesday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, alleges the Obama administration repeatedly has demonstrated it will change or ignore certain laws or statutes to promote or protect its political agenda.

“We filed this lawsuit today because we wanted to put an end to the Obama administration’s efforts to really ignore the rule of law,” Morrisey said Tuesday evening. “This lawsuit, I think, will have a very positive effect protecting West Virginia jobs and, ultimately, limiting the president’s authority that applies to energy, health care and a host of important matters.”

The lawsuit cites several instances where the administration has ignored the law on immigration matters, environmental and mining regulations and the implementation of the Affordable Care Act.

W.V. Legal Journal

edit on 1-8-2014 by guohua because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 1 2014 @ 01:47 AM
link   
Sorry D P.
edit on 1-8-2014 by guohua because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 1 2014 @ 02:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sremmos80
Is that different the getting us into 2 useless wars that killed women and children as well?


That as done by Republican Presidents, so they are fine, this was done by a Democrat President so it is so bad!



posted on Aug, 1 2014 @ 03:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: Sremmos80
Is that different the getting us into 2 useless wars that killed women and children as well?


That as done by Republican Presidents, so they are fine, this was done by a Democrat President so it is so bad!


2 wars that were authorized by Congress, including democrats.

Congress exercised their authority by authorizing the use of military force.
Obama's use of executive orders to change / ignore / modify existing law is in fact illegal and unconstitutional.

You guys really need to keep your eye on the ball and stop trying to drag up previous actions that were lawful. One would think with the full throated defense of the President would rely on more than what occurred during other administrations. Obama has been in office for 6 years now.. This mess is his own making.




top topics



 
12
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join