Structures/bases on the far side of the moon - where is ATS at

page: 7
10
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join

posted on Jul, 19 2014 @ 06:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Uggielicious

The demon effigy is awesome.




posted on Jul, 19 2014 @ 07:00 PM
link   
NASA is hiding pictures of Megatron, I saw a movie about it



posted on Jul, 20 2014 @ 05:43 AM
link   
a reply to: resistanceisfutile

My only question is why in all the clementine pictures of the moon there is high quality pictures and all of a sudden in the middle of the pictures there are sensored images of some object or building, like they were taking a picture of something, because we humans like to put the object we're taking a picture of in the center

www.marsanomalyresearch.com...

just an example



posted on Jul, 20 2014 @ 06:20 AM
link   
a reply to: TheLawOfOne

The blurred area is just an artifact of the image browser.

Notice the scale of that image. 1km per pixel. The blurred area is enormous. Any building would be less that one pixel at that scale. Any real object of the size of the blurred image could hardly be concealed!



posted on Jul, 22 2014 @ 02:40 PM
link   
Given the lack of atmosphere and meteor-pocked nature of the surface of the moon, why would an intelligent species who was trying to stay secret put a base on the lunar surface at all? Underground on the moon seems like a far smarter option for all reasons. What is the benefit of putting your secret base on the surface of the moon?



posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 09:36 AM
link   
Original NASA picture:
www.hq.nasa.gov...




This was written by our very own moderator ArMaP here on ATS.


Yes, I used Photoshop, more specifically the "Replace Color" tool.

By selecting a pixel from the sky and changing it's colour you can then change the "Fuzziness" value to select more or less colours. It's a very useful technique that I saw in one of those videos showing the altered images.


So the answer to Rob's question, yes NASA manipulate many of there photo's, and their is plenty more also, but instead of asking for evidence all the time, go find the truth the same way many others already have, by researching!



edit on 26k14bWednesdayuAmerica/Chicago32014Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:08:26 -0500 by skyblueworld because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 10:10 AM
link   
a reply to: skyblueworld

That's odd: I don't get any pattern like that at all when I do the same with that original image on the NASA site.

The one in the post you quote shows an image that has been "cleaned up" by somebody with a clone tool. It's not the image off the NASA server, which only shows random noise as far as I can see. I haven't selected all the different shades of black, but it's clear from the first few that there is no pattern here.




posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 10:32 AM
link   
a reply to: Rob48


I may have posted the wrong link then.

LINK to picture.

And yes no anomalies on the original that I posted it seems, but plenty in the above of manipulation.

edit on 42k14bWednesday000000America/Chicago32014Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:32:42 -0500 by skyblueworld because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 11:11 AM
link   
a reply to: skyblueworld

Yes, that is the one. It seems to have been rather sloppily cleaned up for web display, so I'd be interested to find out exactly where it came from. That gallery has some pretty poor quality scans in it.

Nothing is being hidden or changed on the original images though, which is the important thing. I always go to the hq.nasa.gov server for the best scans of Apollo stuff.


For modern digital data, of course, no scanning is necessary.



posted on Jul, 23 2014 @ 12:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Rob48

I like to use the Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth, which usually has very high quality and obviously unedited scans.

Here's their copy of the one in question

eol.jsc.nasa.gov...

edit on 23-7-2014 by onebigmonkey because: bad link





top topics
 
10
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in

join