It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hobby Lobby and the supreme court.

page: 4
2
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 3 2014 @ 07:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: buster2010
Until the egg implants it is not considered a pregnancy

It's a conceived child. To end that conception is to end the life. You all console yourselves with saying that because the conceived child hasn't latched on to the wall of the uterus that it isn't real or something. That's absurd.




posted on Jul, 3 2014 @ 07:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: windword
Sometime after birth, between newborn and toddler.

So a person could 'abort' a week old baby, or a month old baby, or a six month old baby, or even a toddler, and it would be fine with you because it's not yet a 'child'? Duuuuude ...



posted on Jul, 3 2014 @ 08:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: VictorVonDoom

originally posted by: RickinVa
a reply to: MarlinGrace


one more time Marlin:

Is it of your esteemed opinion that companies/corporations have the self conscious ability and sentient awareness to understand religion and have religious beliefs without outside human influence?


Just out of the blue this morning it occurred to me that the argument could be made.

Corporations have been accused of being evil, even Satanic. There is even a current thread about the Starbucks logo being a pagan goddess. Disney has been accused of being anti-semitic. Corporations have things like "mission statements" and "values" in their charters. Corporations have been accused of being racist and sexist. All of these things we associate with a human mindset. Even the Vatican City and the Catholic Church are incorporated.

And that was before my morning coffee.


You are so right especially that ultra evil Walmart..



posted on Jul, 3 2014 @ 03:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: windword
Sometime after birth, between newborn and toddler.

So a person could 'abort' a week old baby, or a month old baby, or a six month old baby, or even a toddler, and it would be fine with you because it's not yet a 'child'? Duuuuude ...


^^^This is the kind of hyperbole that makes the anti-choice community look so darn crazy! We are talking about the right of women to alter the PH quality of the their own uteri so that they won't become pregnant. And then there are nuts like you, and the Hahns and the Greens, who "believe" these women, and any who enable them, to be immoral murderers! They think that their belief gives them the moral high ground and the right to step between women and their doctors and make health and welfare decisions for them.

You know what? Never mind!


edit on 3-7-2014 by windword because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics
 
2
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join