It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Published by Swedish Institute of International Affairs. www. ui.se
An Analysis of Article 222 of the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union
originally posted by: oblvion
Sounds like you guys need a 2nd amendment right to make them fear for their well being.
originally posted by: MarlinGrace
originally posted by: oblvion
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Bassago
Well...
That's it then. You know, if the EU police are going to be involved in quelling disputes between the British people and their government, they are going to get butchered in the streets. The only reason there are not massive fatalities amongst the British police force, every time there is a confrontation between themselves and protesting groups of people (for example, during the student riots of a few years back), is because the British people recognise that our police force at least keeps up the pretence of policing by consent.
No consent will ever be given for a force of people controlled from outside our country exclusively, as this new organisation would be, to do the same work here. Many of us refuse to accept the right of the EU to meddle in the affairs of our government and our law, and are appalled at the attempts they have seen in the media and so on. If they actually try to put their will forward through a unified police force, that force will be bludgeoned into mush if they step out of line.
Sounds like you guys need a 2nd amendment right to make them fear for their well being.
Funny I was thinking will all of the UK anti-gunners wish they had a 2nd amendment now. This is why we have it.
originally posted by: Bassago
"Loosely defined crisis." That should just about cover anything TPTB and elites want. Good luck EU.
originally posted by: theabsolutetruth
I posted the actual Solidarity clause press release and the website of Eurogendor, which has been around since 2004 and has yet only done humanitarian work, furthermore the recent Solidarity Clause is for combatting terrorism, that is a good thing.
Here it is again, with some of the summation from analysis of the clause by Swedish Institute of International Affairs. www.ui.se
originally posted by: jude11
It will be interesting to see if Brits or Americans cave first to welcome their new overlords. It won't matter tho...whoever starts,the other will follow because the work was proven successful.
Peace
None, I treat the clause as reasonable. So I say that you "spoil fun" for the rest people here, who put great effort in to presenting it as something sinister.
originally posted by: theabsolutetruth
a reply to: Shadow1024
As I said before the thread is specifically about EUROGENDFOR and the recent EUROGENDFOR Solidarity Clause which is mostly about COMBATTING TERRORISM, and being effective after manmade or natural disasters. Fact!
The thread title is totally false, it should be in the hoax bin yet it has 20 stars on it's opening post and people mostly posting things that are entirely irrelevant to the Solidarity Clause.
Which part of the Solidarity clause are you disagreeing?
As I said before the thread is specifically about EUROGENDFOR and the recent EUROGENDFOR Solidarity Clause which is mostly about COMBATTING TERRORISM, and being effective after manmade or natural disasters.
try googling ISIS recruitment video
Try googling Boston bomber