I'm not sure where to start, but I want to skip any lengthy disclaimers and just say: I don't care how many
people read what I write here.
If anything, it is just as much for You as it is for Me, and if only one person gets something positive out of this post, I suppose its "purpose"
has been served..
I want to hear what "isms" or labels you folks think "my views" reflect, and if they can be quantized under one heading or another..
I don't subscribe to any labels myself, but I would like to know if anyone else feels like they are in the same predicaments..
I don't claim to have "the RIGHT view", so much as I claim to be "asking the RIGHT questions" with the goal of collaborating compassionately, and
answering to no authority other than the experiences with had in each of our individual Human Conditions..
but i'll cut to the chase:
I have noticed a certain mentality online (and especially in the "conspiracy crowd") where people seem obligated to "take sides" and basically
just throw words at each other
from opposing sides of false dichotomies; submitting to authority that is based on nothing more than the
"authority figure" wearing the right badge and having the right title..
While i cannot say that i have been entirely immune to succumbing to these time-wasting debates, I hope to possibly provide some insight and possibly
save people some time and breath.. instead of "being right
all the time" and trying to make the world conform to our ideals, people need to
simply open themselves to the world AS IT IS
and collaborate with the aspects of the world which they feel deserve to thrive
Here are some reoccurring issues that never seem to be resolved (or in fact get worse with every attempt to solve "the problem") and my simple
this is a false concept just like eugenics and a theory of a flat earth.
it is OBSOLETE.
perhaps I have thought this way (most of my life) because if i were to list my "ethnicity", it would be: German, Russian, French, English, Irish,
Polish, Ukrainian, and Native American.. My skin is pale, but how does the term "Caucasian" possibly describe "what i am"..?
The joke seems to be that we have been taught to use the term "a person of color" to refer to anyone with a brown pigment in their skin.. but
don't we ALL have color..???
just because i am pale, doesn't mean i am somehow "without color"..
I am not "white" just as the DARKEST African isn't "black".. These are generalizations that only serve to put people on either side of an
I'm frustrated that people who will post about "false flags" all over the internet, would never stop long enough to think "hmmm.. perhaps our
language is being used to control our perspectives.."
"black" is not a Race. "white" is not a race.
Even the "purest German" of Hitler's little fantasy, had to have been made up of many ethnicities only hundreds of years before
let go of it and realize that genetics may be a reality, but essentially tells us nothing about who we are, after the event of our birth
again, Culture doesn't really exist..
at least not any more than the reality WE give to it
"The Bieber wears no clothes!!!"
It used to only be "the emperors" who could get away with going out in public naked and oblivious, but I'm pretty sure that even a majority of the
peasants were aware of the reality.. But now it seems as if the peasants are fooling themselves and in fact WANT to be naked themselves, in hopes
of being one of many pseudo-emperors
or "celebrities" as they have come to be known..
without the individuals
in a society, there IS NO CULTURE
and doesn't one cease to have individuality once they decide to conform to "a scene"..?
But who even has a choice of knowing who people like "justin beiber" are, anymore..?
here in the ol' US of A, we are taught that we have to somehow aim to "keep up with culture" lest we fall behind who is popular in the media..
This is most evident in the way that it seems like the entertainment industries actually have to manufacture
a majority of their
"celebrities", while raw talent seems to be an afterthought (or even a threat to the industry as "they" want it..) and the material that actually
has "substance" seems to be kept few-and-far-between, like they're afraid of the "talent economy" somehow becoming "inflated" haha..
but it is WE, my friends, who are the engineers of this culture, and no amount of money in hands of wrinkled old men is going to change that fact..
actually, it seems that the only people who CAN change that fact is US
, and so when i see people in their teens and their 20s gladly giving up
their power and influence on our culture so they might feel that they "belong", I must admit that i feel a tad worried.. or perhaps disturbed
would be the right word..
Every time i turn on the radio (which is very rare these days, but i hafta do a little research here and there
) it seems to somehow get more and
more blatant that the people who are running the entertainment industries think of the masses as nothing but a wallet with human meat attached to
, and just so long as they can prey on that human's psychology, they know they will make a certain amount of profit..
No, this is not some kind of MKULTRA mind control..
this is what they call MARKETING
and in the early part of the last century, it was called mesmerism
don't you think it's kinda interesting how mesmerism and hypnotism obviously WORK (on many people), and yet they are not considered to be a branch
of the paradigm of Psychology..?
-hmmmm.. why would that be..?
is a figment of our imaginations
the "big three" of religions do a pretty good job of seeming
like their teachings somehow oppose
each other, but this is an
Judaism, Christianity, and Islam have so much in common that i daresay they are one and the same "religion"
and essentially the continuation
of one idea. Since I'm an American it's easiest to conceptualize as a movie trilogy analogy
Judaism is the original..
like most "originals" it is actually the repackaging of a diverse set of traditions and ideas that came before it, combined these ideas in a new
way, and either out of necessity or because of the effect that the passage of time has on oral tradition.. but the works that emerged from Judaism
took a lot of work and determination
.. the only problem was that their systems of thought and revelation were extremely specialized and
specific to the Jewish culture, that outside understanding of their works. The Torah (old testament) is difficult enough to follow for an outsider
(gentile), let alone works such as The Zohar.. though when one does delve into them, there is a very exact yet poetic elucidation of what they see as
an unknowable complexity behind all things:
Christianity is the sequel..
Like many sequels, it wasn't an immediate hit. Despite it's recent popularity (and i MEAN
recent..), there were plenty of setbacks and
"rewrites to the script" before Christianity really had a "international release" haha..