It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Corinthas
Wow.. after all this time.
What gives them the authority to act as Templars? And why should the Vatican apologise for putting down a group that had effectively 'gone awol'?
SW
beyond that there is the families of those wronged
Originally posted by Nygdan
I am merely asking, why should anyone think that they are the Knights Templar?
"We cannot not recognize the betrayal of the Gospel committed by some of our brothers, especially in the second millennium," he said.
The Knights Templar were supposed to be celibate warrior-monks. If they have offspring, they are illegitimate, and especially back then would'nt've had any claim, any actual legal claim, to any land possesed by Templars.
Originally posted by stalkingwolf
first, just because the Templars themselves took vows of celebacy does not
mean that their brothers,sisters, nieces ,nephews, aunts, and uncles did.
second, any surviving after the arrests and actions from 1307 - 1314 would no longer have necessarily been obligated to keep those vows. The church broke faith with them why would they keep faith to a faithless church that broke its
own laws?
third, there is an organization that claims an unbroken line of GMs based on the Larminius charter.
it is possible that they could have the documents to support their claims.
Originally posted by Nygdan
The church ordered that the order, which was a sub-group created by the church itself, be disbanded. They refused, and the church punished them. That does not mean that the church 'broke' its contract with them.
Originally posted by The Axeman
He had the pope in his pocket and together they accused the Templars of heresy, homosexuality, and several other trumped up charges.
It was a travesty then and it remains a travesty in my mind to this day. To hear someone say that the church simply "punished" the order for "refusing to disband" makes my stomach turn.
All their wealth was property of the Order as a whole, therefore could not be inherited by individual Templars' sons.
Originally posted by chief_counsellor
How can an organization that doesn't exist ask for an apology? They were dissovled a long time ago. I don't think any organization today can actually claim to be in lineage to the original Knights Templar.
Originally posted by Byrd
Originally posted by chief_counsellor
How can an organization that doesn't exist ask for an apology? They were dissovled a long time ago. I don't think any organization today can actually claim to be in lineage to the original Knights Templar.
Y'know, that was the first question that crossed MY mind as I read the article. As far as I know, the organization isn't faithful to the original (which prohibited contact with ANYTHING female, including birds (no eggs!), horses, etc. Actually, women could do their household chores if men weren't available but with laundromats and dishwashers these days, there's no excuse for that.) Nor do I see them leading a very monkish life (unlike the real ones.)
Maybe the Pope should issue "I'm sorry that you're such a fake?"