logical evidence that there is/is not a God., page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 29-11-2004 @ 10:47 PM by Alec Eiffel
Originally posted by Slicky1313
Alec- if God is a supernatural being who always existed, as stated in my defintion, how can God have a father?
1- God is supernatural, not human
2- eternal
HOW THE *coughs* how could he have a father and mother and be born by that definition??!!?!?!! u sad sick *coughs again* maybe yer trying to find a desperate attempt to find fault in this, since u cant find any logical evidence of how God doesnt exist, so yer last desperate dying attempt is to try and attack the words of people, which has obviously failed and you run out of options.
and if God had a mother he obviously wouldnt be God, now would he??! gahhh- use yer brain, u no that thing in yer head, yeah, THAT one. I hope u aitheist get ready for when I put together my formula for DNA matches that will blow the odds out of the sky and it would take so much faith to belive we ever mutated from a single celled organsim over time, the chances are astronomically out of the world- but lets stick to the subject, u gfot any logical evidence to suggest God doesnt exist (ohhh, I got ya on that one, I guess, I assume yer answer is no) go ahead, try yer old "well God dont exist and prove it if he does" trick if ya want, along with any of ya, its still no logical evidence.


Do you even know what you wrote? You said let me define "him." Im only going by how you defined God, and you defined God as male, I can logically conclude this because you reffered to God as him.


reply posted on 29-11-2004 @ 11:23 PM by Alec Eiffel
Originally posted by Slicky1313
dooo dad, doo da. once again, last desperate attempts because u really cant deny the fact God exist here, must be u dont quite have any logical information

I always refer to God as "he" im technically not implying hes male either, its just how I refer to God as. but hey, if ya wanna get technical about it, ill try not to say he no more, but "God" ok? im not throwing in any personal beliefs, just another word for God to me

and if God ceased to exist after he created matter, how could that be possiible? think about it, if yer the all powerful your very existence and word holds together gravity itself and everythin in the universe. and if your all powerful, how could u ever destroy yerself and since u set everything in motion all that would just poof if u were gone. its like saying God gave all God's power to you. its just not logical, if God is God, then he technically cant really give his power away, since hes still God. its lik making a rock so big u cant pick up. the power and how Big God is boggles the mind, but we no one thing, God is bigger than my house, and thats about as far as we no.


I thought this was about logic? Either define God as you meant God to be defined, or dont define God at all. I think your definition of God is too vague for me to logically argue whehter God does or does not exist. It's behind comphrehension, this debate is pretty meaningless. But, anyways, this is what we know about God so far: All powerful, eternal, bigger than a house. Its impossible to logically conclude whether God exists or not, because when you define God, you're attempting to define what cannot be comprehended. And you cant define what you cant comphrehend. But whatever, continue your dicussion with others with meaningless definitions of something that is behind comprehension.


reply posted on 30-11-2004 @ 10:56 AM by Nygdan
slicky1313
if God is a supernatural being who always existed, as stated in my defintion

This was not the definiton. The 'allways' existed part was given as evidence of its existence. You were saying that there needs to be something that is eternal, and that that therefore is god. This of course is not good reasoning nor evidence, but don't start changing things around now.
if the universe is eternal, it would have NO beginning.

Then how can you say 'now' as in run out by now? If there can be a now, then there can be a high concentration of hydrogen now. If the universe is eternal, then there is no reason to think that it'd run out of hydrogen.
attero
The only cause is god, because that is the definition of god

well I'll agree that one can set it that way, but we were considering 'evidence' for or against god, so that can't actually be used.


slicky
because u really cant deny the fact God exist

this is getting rather silly. You have failed to present any evidence that god exists. I think that everyone else here is stating that there isn't evidence that proves he doesn't exist either, but you seem to think that there is evidence that he does exist. You mentioned some stuff in your first post, and all of it was unacceptable and not evidence of anything.
if yer the all powerful your very existence and word holds together gravity itself and everythin in the universe. and if your all powerful, how could u ever destroy yerself

An all powerful god could certainly undo its own existence. Its allpowerful. It doesn't need to be around to 'hold together gravity'. Are you saying god can't design a universe that can hold itself together?
if there is a God, it doesnt matter how much brain power u have to the individual, u cant get rid of the fact God is there

no one is saying that if there is a god then one can demonstrate that there isn't a god.
Therefore, there must have been something that formed the universe, and everything in it.

If mountains and planets can be built without a builder, then what does it matter if a house can't?
and the chances of evolution happening are so long

You are already discussing this somewhere else and have not been able to support that assertion there. Why are you repeating it here?
joe head
What a pitiful existence we would have on this earth if there is no God

Your opinion on the pitifulness of an atheistic existence is not 'logical evidence for or against god'.
I still think the people for bringing logical evidence for a God are winning.

Is there any point in continuing this discussion with you? You seem to think that there is some sort of win/loose situation going on here. More bizzarely, you think you are winning, when you have failed ot present any evidence for the existence of god. Are you merely trolling, or are you trying to have a discussion on the topic? If you are trying to have a discussion, why is it that you are systematically ignoring any valid points that anyone else brings up? Is there any reason for anyone here to think that continuing this converstation will not be a complete waste of time? Its already been 'downgraded' to 'Below Top Secret'. Whats next, Chit Chat? Besides, if its a contest you want, there is a Debate Forum.
how did the planets get set in motion on the gravitational pull by just chance anyway?

What does it matter? Any naturalistic explanation for the origins of the solar system will not be evidence for or against god anyway. Its entirely irrelevant to the situation.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Belief in God/Jesus through Personal experiences.
  Posted 18 days ago with 9 member flags
What was God doing before "In the beginning"?
  Posted 14 days ago with 9 member flags
Stay Out Of HELL.
  Posted 12 days ago with 9 member flags
Do Christians really want to Start World War 3?
  Posted 3 days ago with 9 member flags
My Hopeful Reintroduction to God
  Posted 17 days ago with 8 member flags